Live presidential broadcast.

[suijuris]

Anyone watch the presidential address last night? Somehow I happened upon it, by accident of course.

When asked about the justification for invading Iraq, he kept saying, sure, we didn't find the WMD yet, but the world is a safer place (no proof offered). And the Iraq people are glad and supported the removal of their dictator.

Since when does our president answer to the Iraq people? Last I checked, Mr. Bush held the office of president of the US, but yet refuses to take the opinions of the American people into any consideration.

Anyway, he kept talking about spreading freedom and democracy (Please read your constitution Mr. Bush), and the planned transfer of sovereignty to the "entity" whose identity is not yet named, at the end of June.

I nearly fell out when he said that that transfer of sovereignty would of course be accompanied with a "security agreement"! Right there on live TV, he admitted that they will enter a security agreement with the new entity that has been established!

Now I know that all us Americans were supposed to be thinking "security" as in military protection for the new entity. But stop and think about it - do you believe for one second that the entity being established has not incurred a MASSIVE DEBT? And do you not think that that while our military will provide "security" to the people of Iraq, that the people of Iraq will not become collateral for the debt, just like over here? Thus, the security agreement!

And who are we to GRANT sovereignty to anyone? Mr. Bush himself said we are all born with it, and it is given to us by the creator. What kind of double talk is that?

Mr. Bush also talks about how the oil in Iraq "belongs to the Iraq people". But when questioned about his pre-war statements that the "oil would cover the costs of the war", he admits to this as well by stating that the revenue from the oil is higher than expected, leaving us to assume that the oil revenue will be used to pay the war debts of both countries. He also stated that he "expected them to destroy the oil fields" when invaded. Hmm, now wouldn't that have tickled him and his oil buddies pink?

People, once you learn to think critically, you can just sit and watch these liars on TV and see right though their cheap scams. I rarely watch such events and was amazed at how many things they left slip. Sometimes, it was almost like he was bragging!

Regards,
Sui Juris

[Jerseee]

Sui Juris,


That is why I always push for folks on the forum to do critical reading of any docs that they get.


As far as your last post...have you ever thought that they all might be in on the fraud? (media, other governments, etc..)

Originally Posted by SuiJuris

I rarely watch such events and was amazed at how many things they left slip. Sometimes, it was almost like he was bragging! Regards, Sui Juris

Heard that I did!


I avoid television like the plague. Great for watching a movie (on tape or disc). After that, it's a dust-collector.


And personally, I've accepted that it IS "bragging." These agents aren't trying to hide anything, nor hide from anyone. They're "in your face" with it.


It's Harold Hill and the boy's band from The Music Man. People hear beautiful marching music performed by people in beautiful uniforms because that's what they choose to see, when the reality of it is simple: The music sucks and the uniforms are just rags.


Randy

[suijuris]

Jerseee,

Yes, I accept as a fact that the media was and is in on the fraud. How else could a man that can normally not string a sentence together even when reading from a teleprompter have a ready response to all the questions put to him in a live interview?

Sui Juris

[Jerseee]

SJ,


Now you're scaring me.

since the major media is owned by the companies which are owned by the real people in charge who control the money and governments, it isn't a surprise this dog & pony show...


jon

And those who ask the questions know they cannot ask one outside the accepted "norm" otherwise they are out a job and blackballed from the industry heirarchy.& Sui Juris, jon: you guys are absolutely correct -&they are in on the fraud.& Some are in unwittingly, others are in constructively/impliedly (if that is a word!).&


BB has <U>unlimited</U> funds. Dog &amp; pony, dog &amp; pony...


Randy, that was funny!


-squirrels

[Ice]

Also take note that he did say we will see terrorist attacks -- not that we MIGHT or MAY -- WILL!!


Was he telling us something?& You decide.


&

[dochand]

Well, since there appears to be mounting evidence that our benevolent (sic) government was at least complicent in the attacks of 9/11, if not actually having been the author of them, why wouldn't our noble leader let us in on the fact that another attack? will be forthcoming?

After all, we do need to pass Patriot 2, do we not?

Doc

[Jerseee]

Doc,

Good point. But I think Patriot Act 2 is passed by in some form or fashion. Since they have been practicing the Patriot Act in covertness for years--I think they are doing the same with version 2.

Hmmm, do y'all think there will be a trilogy of this Act? (hint: the Matrix trilogy).