
04-25-2006, 05:51 AM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Terra
Posts: 601
|
|
|
Wyoming Sheriffs Put Federal Officers On Choke-chains
It's about time !!
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin...cgi?read=88054
How does that make the treasonous traitors who visit and/or run their mouths here feel ?
Like the treasonous traitors you are ??
__________________
At Arms-length.
|

04-25-2006, 06:10 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by squirrel
|
Good finding, squirrel.
I'm glad somebody still recongnize the ten amendment.
If sheriff is not welcome FBI,IRS etc in their office, I wonder how they think private citizen feel for their intrusion into their life.
__________________
Resolution pending
|

04-25-2006, 08:11 AM
|
|
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 292
|
|
Please read the official statement of the court
Quote:
United States District Court
District of Wyoming
Our office has been receiving inquiries regarding the case of Castaneda v. United States, No. 96-CV-099.
This was a civil case arising out of an alleged entry into an apartment by law enforcement officials in June of 1993. The Plaintiffs, who were staying in the apartment, alleged that the officials violated their civil rights. They filed an action against the United States, unnamed INS agents, Big Horn County, the County Sheriff, and unnamed Sheriff's deputies.
The complaint was filed in the Federal District Court for the District of Wyoming in May, 1996. The federal defendants were primarily represented by attorneys with the Constitutional Torts Branch of the Civil Division of the Department of Justice. The County defendants were represented by non-federal attorneys. The case was settled following a settlement conference in 1997. The court did not rule on Plaintiffs' claims or any other legal issues in the case. After the settlement conference, Big Horn County Sheriff, David M. Mattis, issued a "Policy." In the "Policy," the Sheriff purports to impose conditions upon federal law enforcement operations in the County.
We have learned that it has been reported, erroneously, that the court made a legal ruling in the Castaneda case regarding the authority of federal law enforcement officials to conduct operations in the County. There was no such ruling or decision. Instead, the court simply granted a motion, submitted jointly by all the parties, to dismiss the case because the parties had settled.
This Court has never issued an order which would serve to limit the lawful activities and duties of federal law enforcement officers and other federal employees in the District of Wyoming.
Furthermore, this Court has never made the comments attributed to it which purports to advise state officers they can prohibit federal law enforcement officers or agents from entering a Wyoming County. Those alleged quotations are utterly false.
Any person who interferes with federal officers in performance of their duties subjects themselves to the risk of criminal prosecution.
William F. Downes
Chief Judge, District of Wyoming
|
http://www.ck10.uscourts.gov/wyoming/district/pdfforms/96cv99.pdf#search='96cv099'
|

04-25-2006, 08:29 AM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Terra
Posts: 601
|
|
|
Sorry for the ruse peeps, I should have looked into it further, I thought that I had seen this before, and I have, upon further study.
The bootlickers can continue to salivate now, but always know, thats all you are, well beside being treasonous traitors to your children and country.
Blaagh, I need a bucket.
Cheif Judge my a$$, there are none in America, only magistrates/masters.
I would say a "person" who believes that which he/she is not, should be the one to see a shrink, what say you all ?
__________________
At Arms-length.
Last edited by squirrel : 04-26-2006 at 05:58 AM.
|

04-25-2006, 06:27 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by squirrel
Cheif Judge my a$$, there are none in America, only magistrates/masters.
I would say a "person" who believes that which he/she is not, should be the one to see a shrink, what say you all ?
|
My experiences tell me that most likely, William F. Downes is a lying son of a bitch.
Yes, I said that.
Henry Franklin
Last edited by HenryBowman : 04-25-2006 at 06:33 PM.
|

04-25-2006, 06:41 PM
|
|
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 292
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HenryBowman
My experiences tell me that most likely, William F. Downes is a lying son of a bitch.
Yes, I said that.
Henry Franklin
|
brilliant !
|

04-26-2006, 06:04 AM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Terra
Posts: 601
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HenryBowman
My experiences tell me that most likely, William F. Downes is a lying son of a bitch.
Yes, I said that.
Henry Franklin
|
They all are, come on, the lie is in your face right in the courtroom.
The plaque on the sissyboys bench says "Judge".
A BLATANT LIE !!!
There are no judges in America, only magistrates, even the roy spleen knows that.
__________________
At Arms-length.
|

04-26-2006, 06:17 AM
|
|
|
|
Although I try to keep my emotions in check when writing here, and trying to speak only words of love, etc, this scenario, when paired with my experience of "judges" who are sincerely afraid of someone who knows the truth, [read: knows how to embarass a "judge" effectively] could be expressed no other way, in my mind.
Henry Franklin
Last edited by HenryBowman : 04-26-2006 at 06:20 AM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:45 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|