Misc. Discussion Post anything here that does not fit elsewhere..


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > General Discussion > Misc. Discussion
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 07-07-2006, 07:40 AM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,417
Brian's main problem is that Brian doesn't believe in God.

That's why he is so confused
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-07-2006, 05:46 PM
Livefire's Avatar
Livefire Livefire is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,544
Lets examine this premise of Weishaupt's......

Does Brian believe in God? If so he would make prayers and supplication.

Fact....Brian DOES make prayers for relief in his legal pleadings prepared for him by an advocate to whom he must sacrifice many FRN's to in order to be heard. So Brian MUST believe in a god.....Let us examine this god more closely....

I have found an astonishing corrallary between American jurisprudence and a religion that is unique to the Americas.....According to Diaz (a sergeant in Hernando Cortez's army) the priesthood that served Huichilobos (Witchy Wolves) were people that were dirty, homosexual and had long uncut hair who wore a black robe while performing their priestly functions.

Today we have a "preisthood" in the legal profession who for the most part have a slovenly appearance, either are base persons or promote an agenda of debauchery and happen to wear a black robe while they metaphorically rip out the still beating hearts of their victims ostensibly in the name of justice and the "common good" of society.

So see Weis....Brian does believe in a god....the only confusion is which one!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-07-2006, 06:54 PM
B Rookard B Rookard is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livefire
Lets examine this premise of Weishaupt's......

Does Brian believe in God? If so he would make prayers and supplication.

Fact....Brian DOES make prayers for relief in his legal pleadings prepared for him by an advocate to whom he must sacrifice many FRN's to in order to be heard. So Brian MUST believe in a god.....Let us examine this god more closely....

I have found an astonishing corrallary between American jurisprudence and a religion that is unique to the Americas.....According to Diaz (a sergeant in Hernando Cortez's army) the priesthood that served Huichilobos (Witchy Wolves) were people that were dirty, homosexual and had long uncut hair who wore a black robe while performing their priestly functions.

Today we have a "preisthood" in the legal profession who for the most part have a slovenly appearance, either are base persons or promote an agenda of debauchery and happen to wear a black robe while they metaphorically rip out the still beating hearts of their victims ostensibly in the name of justice and the "common good" of society.

So see Weis....Brian does believe in a god....the only confusion is which one!


To the "moderators" ...

Just wondering if this post violates the terms of the forum.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-07-2006, 07:38 PM
Livefire's Avatar
Livefire Livefire is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,544
Please present evidence that my corrallary between the legal profession and the preisthood is incorrect. Just because I draw parallels between your beloved legal community and blood thirsty savages who served Huichilobos doesnt constitute an ad hominem attack. You of course reserve the right find my remarks offensive. Your posts in this forum are prima facie evidence of your high reverence for the legal profession and its status. Correct me if Im wrong citizen ROOKARD, but I believe YOU have assailed folks ad hominem with remarks concerning their intelligence and other such things because of their philosophical leanings.

I did not at any time assault your character or your person. I merely made an observation of the deity you seem to venerate on this forum. You may be an honorable man but in my humble opinion giving honor to a system that is anything but honorable and an affront to the Almighty who himself said "Woe be unto you lawyers , for you have taken away the key of knowledge: you entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering, you hindered!"

Last edited by Livefire : 07-07-2006 at 07:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-08-2006, 06:09 AM
aksis's Avatar
aksis aksis is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Universal Kingdom of God; Earth
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by B Rookard
I do not have the "legislative power" ... I don't have the "executive power" ... and I don't have the "judicial power."


Brian, let me ask you this in different words because I think you do, and, prehaps the questions from a different prespective would help.

This is more to the point of what I want to know:

Do you have the ability to formlaue thought lines that would be violations of unalienable human rights & write them down on paper? ie: can you describe with words, somewhat common activity that would harm someone or their property, or would be in violation of a contract, or would be some other unalienable human rights violation? (this is essence of the leguslative power)

Do you have the ability to see an act, or hear from first hand witnesses descriptions of an act, and, make a determination of if the act you witnessed or heard about has harmed someone, their property or violated peoples unalienable human rights? (this is the essence of the judicial power)

Do you have the ability to do something to stop the aformentioned activity? Could you, even if you don't handle it your self, call some friends to help, or, since there are people that you employ that are armed, call them? (this is the essence of the executive power)

Quote:
Originally Posted by B Rookard
Are you denying that those powers are granted to the state and federal governments?

Yes. I can not give someone an inherent ability that everyone naturaly has. Further, they were delegated not granted, and, it is clearer to say that the Duties were delegated then the Powers ~ seeing as how they are inherent abilities that every human has, yet not everyone does all the duties that is required of a sovereign.... its a lot of work, yet we can do it if it has to be done.

Quote:
Originally Posted by B Rookard
The Constitutions are quite specific ya know.

Will you show me where in the state or federal constitutions that it says that the leguslative, executive, and judicial powers are granted to you or me?

I hope that in light of the above, that you no longer believe that you need papers to give you abilities you have always had.

Prehaps papers that serve other purposes would now be seen of more value that they had been...

Further, why don't you grasp that you can not give away your powers any more then you could give away your heart or brain? Yet, it seems obvious that people can be tricked out of, or, talked out of them. Especialy if they are not clear on their inherent Rights Powers & Duties.

Quote:
Originally Posted by B Rookard
We influence those powers by voting ... but I never have passed any laws personally ... unless you consider ballot proposals legislating ... in which case, that's the closest I've come.

This may be a little hard to grasp seeing as how the statutes are such a mess, but simply:

The leguslator dosn't write law.

The simplicity of all "public leguslation" is that it is noting more then discriptions of common ways that people harm one another, their property or other unalienable human rights violations, and also provides a caned structure for contracts (UCC)

Seeing as the people have no right to violate other peoples rights, even as a group, they can not delegate such power to the leguslators.

You can not give what you don't have.

The People have no power to make a law that would violate unalienable human rights & common law ~ Do naught unto others as you would not have done to you; harm no one or their property; honour your lawful agreements.

Granted, there are fine points to what violates common law and a humans unalienable rights and this is where Courts, simply 12 competent honest people, make the call on if it is foul or fair.

It is also nice to have People willing to enforce, or people who will back you up when you go to retrieve property that has been stolen... yet if your like me, you probably already have a group of friends that would go with you if they knew you had been robbed to help get you stuff, or who would prevent you from getting jumped (rarly is there a cop present during an assult, and what do they do most time other then hunt down, try, and then punish?).



Akira,

I Love the illustration.
__________________
Note: It is a custom recognized by many People to use a ":" (colon) between one's name and their FAMILY name, and is used to segregate the name pertaining to the natural sovereign man, "Christopher Theodore," from the FAMILY name, "RHODES" (an implied trust), and further, both from the name of the implied constructive trust resulting from the workings of the New Deal, "CHRISTOPHER THEODORE RHODES."
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-08-2006, 02:32 PM
Livefire's Avatar
Livefire Livefire is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by B Rookard
The Constitutions are quite specific ya know.

Will you show me where in the state or federal constitutions that it says that the leguslative, executive, and judicial powers are granted to you or me?

ROOKARD asks an impossibility, constitutions are instructions from the soveriegn to instruments of government to fulfill their desire to live in freedom and peace. The lawful sovereign (We the People) arent restricted by these written instruments, their subservient institutions ARE! The Federal Constitution states this principle clearly where it says that any rights not specifically enumerated remain with the people. If you wish to find answers to ROOKARD'S question, one must turn to the law that governs the living sovereign, that being the law of Yahweh and common law.

David Merill has made some very interesting posts about Noachide law and how a Jew was REQUIRED to establish a court of competent jursidiction if none existed wherever he decided to dwell. To keep in line with Rlynne's question, one could possibly use an adminstrative default process and file that as a foreign judgment in either a Federal or State miscellaneous jacket. Then file a request for the clerk to issue the writ of execution. Just my opinion here, I would suggest further study!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-09-2006, 11:49 AM
RickA's Avatar
RickA RickA is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livefire
Lets examine this premise of Weishaupt's......

Does Brian believe in God? If so he would make prayers and supplication.

Fact....Brian DOES make prayers for relief in his legal pleadings prepared for him by an advocate to whom he must sacrifice many FRN's to in order to be heard. So Brian MUST believe in a god.....Let us examine this god more closely....

I have found an astonishing corrallary between American jurisprudence and a religion that is unique to the Americas.....According to Diaz (a sergeant in Hernando Cortez's army) the priesthood that served Huichilobos (Witchy Wolves) were people that were dirty, homosexual and had long uncut hair who wore a black robe while performing their priestly functions.

Today we have a "preisthood" in the legal profession who for the most part have a slovenly appearance, either are base persons or promote an agenda of debauchery and happen to wear a black robe while they metaphorically rip out the still beating hearts of their victims ostensibly in the name of justice and the "common good" of society.

So see Weis....Brian does believe in a god....the only confusion is which one!


To the "moderators" ...

Just wondering if this post violates the terms of the forum.

No, it is not a violation of the terms of this forum. Unless the truth is in violation to the terms of this forum.

If you will remember, I said the same thing a couple of weeks ago, just not in so many words.

Another thing you do not get is, if they truely were about liabling you, they wouldn't present the truth to you. It would have been more the equivalent of swim or drown, but it hasn't been now has it?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Habeas Corpus - The Most Extraordinary Writ Admin Articles & News 3 09-23-2007 07:59 PM
Help me with a mandamus? planetmark Court 131 03-17-2006 10:05 PM
"Petition for Writ of Mandamus" to the Florida Supreme Court iamfreeru2 Court 7 08-02-2005 01:13 PM
writ of mandamus kgod999 Court 1 07-21-2004 02:21 PM
MOTION FOR PAYMENT OF RENT PENDING WRIT OF CERTIORARI.” ntellect Court 18 07-03-2004 01:19 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:25 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer