A Question about Criminal Mischeif & Trespass

[Jerry Pitts]

Gee... I guess that also explains why it was a part of the informational package of HJR192 (public law 73-10). Hmmmm.

In regards to the former JAG officer who died in the hospital, I guess he was telling too much of the truth, like in the example of Kennedy. Now speaking of Naval officers and their roles in the militaristic take-over of the geography known as North America, let us consider the information that is published in the Army field manuals in regard to treatment of 'civilians' during time when the military is called into 'active' measures within the geography of North America. Shall we go there? It is not yet a part of this thread, but a new thread can be started if need be.

Jerry

Originally Posted by Shoonra

I have read that booklet and the mentions of it in the Congressional Record. It was not the expression of Congress, nor even written up at Congressional request. A Congressman got special permission to print up this booklet at public expense because the manuscript had been sent to him by a constituent (this was a favor that was not uncommon many years ago but now very restricted) -- a retired Navy JAG lawyer who had previously written a substantial textbook on military contracts. But at that time this man was in a military nursing home and died a few years after this booklet was published. It represents only his own interpretations, and the Congress did not even know of its content when it allowed this booklet to be printed as a favor.

[farmer_giles_of_ham]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

First, the caretaker is not the owner of the property, nor necessarily its manager, and probably has no authority to sell digging or other rights on the property any more than the janitor of a hotel has to hand out free room reservations.

He has the apparent authority, as per statute.

Second, I'll bet that Texas, like most states, has some sort of law restricting digs of Indian antiquities. I am not sure if even the outright owners of land can dig in violation of those restrictions.

Which has nothing to do with this case, "this fellow" is not charged with disturbing indian antiquities.

Third, this fellow seems to be in serious legal trouble now and I suggest he not try to handle this by himself.

yeah, he should get an attorney who will argue about "indian digging rights" when he is actually charged with mischief and trespass.

Thats what public education does- teaches the clash of random opinions.

Get 10 free lawyers as co-counsel, for sure, proceed IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and make sure you keep your eyes on the matter at hand- you are accused of specific "crimes" and the allegations must fit the bill by claiming each and every element of the offense charged.

But I think you will be alright- it's just a class C misdemeanor, up to $1000 fine total for 2 charges. It's actually not that serious, drag your feet, good luck.

[Jerry Pitts]

For clarification on George Cyrus Thorpe and his writings:


THORPE, GEORGE CYRUS
Citation:
The USMC Brevet Medal is presented to George Cyrus Thorpe, First Lieutenant, U.S. Marine Corps, for distinguished conduct and public service in the presence of the enemy at Novaleta, Philippine Islands. On March 28, 1901, appointed Captain, by brevet, from October 8, 1899.
Born: 1/7/1875 at Minnesota Home Town: , Minnesota
China (Boxer Rebellion) U.S. Marine Corps

Books and other writings by George Cyrus Thorpe

Federal departmental organization and practice. By George Cyrus Thorpe. Kansas City: Vernon Law Book Co., and St. Paul: West Publishing Co. 1925. Pp. xi, 1027

• National and State Prohibition under the Eighteenth Amendment by George Cyrus Thorpe
Author(s) of Review: Mabel Walker Willebrandt
Columbia Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 4 (Apr., 1926), pp. 499-500
doi:10.2307/1113306

George Cyrus Thorpe, Pure Logistics: The Science of War Preparation, 1917.



Prohibition digest: Statutory references and digest of decisions of the courts of the United States relating to intoxicating liquor by George Cyrus Thorpe (Unknown Binding - 1926)


The federal Securities act manual: A treatise based on the federal Securities act of 1933 and the Corporation of foreign bondholders act, 1933, with forms, rules and regulations by George Cyrus Thorpe (Unknown Binding - 1933)

Executive departments -- United States.
Federal departmental organization and practice [microform] : the executive departments, bureaus and independent establishments of the United States government / by George Cyrus Thorpe.
Kansas City : Vernon Law Book Co. ; St. Paul : West Pub. Co., 1925.

And of course let us not fail to mention the infamous writing entitled ‘contracts payable in gold’, which was mentioned also at this location: http://www.crownrights.com/blog/ebook/twenty-five.htm

[quasimodo]

ADDENDUM TO PLEA
OF INNOCENCE

To: Judge (Name Protected)

In the case of docket number XX-XXXXX your office was sent by way of fax on December 6, 2007 a request for the court to dismiss all charges by the private property owner where upon the owner’s land these charges were issued due to a misunderstanding.
Therefore I do at this time proclaim my innocence by entering a plea to this court respective of my proclamation.
It is with all due respect for the court that I ask this plea be recognized by the court.

(Name Protected) No Recourse

In the case of docket number YY-YYYYY your office was sent by way of fax on December 6, 2007 a request for the court to dismiss all charges by the private property owner where upon the owner’s land these charges were issued due to a misunderstanding.
Therefore I do at this time proclaim my innocence by entering a plea to this court respective of my proclamation.
It is with all due respect for the court that I ask this plea be recognized by the court.

(Name Protected) No Recourse

The Court's response;

No. XX-XXXXX
YY-YYYYY

THE STATE OF TEXASIN THE (JUSTICE) COURT
VS. (CITY OF AUSTIN) PCT. 2)
(Name Protected) TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

MOTION TO DISMISS
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
NOW COMES the STATE of TEXAS, represented herein by her County Attorney, and moves the Court to dismiss the above entitled and numbered cause charging the defendant with the offence of
Crim Mischief & Crim Trespass For the reson
V requests X


WHEREFOR, PREMISES CONSIDERED, The State of Texas prays that this cause be dismissed for the reason above stated.


Respectfully submitted,

DATE: 12/14/07 (Name Protected)
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
TO THE SHERIFF OF TRAVIS COUNTY:
The above listed case was dismissed in the (JUSTICE) Court in the above date on the motion of the County Attorney. You are hereby authorized and directed to recall the warrant, if unexecuted, or to release the defendant if not held on any other warrants or commitments.

DATE: 12/14/07 (Name Protected)
JUDGE (JUSTICE) COURT
(CITY OF AUSTIN) (PCT 2)
TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

[quasimodo]

DEEP breath,,, hold,,, breath out.
It's over.
And I never had to go into the court room. I consider this a success.
Q
(edit) Thanks to all ;)

[mrg]

Congratulations.

You should post this and a summary in the success forum.

[mrg]

I am partial to quasimodo's self-reliant, self-sufficient integrity:

integrity

Pronunciation:
\in-ˈte-grə-tē\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English integrite, from Middle French & Latin; Middle French integrité, from Latin integritat-, integritas, from integr-, integer entire
Date:
14th century


incorruptibility

an unimpaired condition

soundness

the quality or state of being complete or undivided

completeness

synonyms see honesty

from: Merriam Webster Online Dictionary

Originally Posted by Shoonra

...this fellow seems to be in serious legal trouble now and I suggest he not try to handle this by himself.

(emphasis added)

Care to define "legal" "trouble?"

Perhaps in contradistinction to "illegal" "trouble?"

Hint:

Woodrow Wilson priming the pump, 1913.


The "come," 1933.

Two healthy ones:

sui juris


Pronunciation:
\ˌsü-ˌī-ˈju̇r-əs, ˌsü-ē-ˈyu̇r-\
Function:
adjective
Etymology:
Latin, of one's own right
Date:
1675

having full legal rights or capacity

Merriam Webster Online Dictionary

Able.

Ability.

Self reliance.

Self-sufficient.

Account-ABLE.

Account-ability.

Doing one's own accounting.

Doing of one's own reckoning.

Administration of one's own affairs.

Responsibility.

Integrity.

HONOR.

INDEPENDENCE.

How, precisely, are these not counted among basic, element-ary principles and VALUES upon which OUR OWN standing among nations is grounded?

And yet, with the urging of voices such as one quoted above, how, precisely, is it not so, that the MAJORITY is now popularly presumed to RULE, and a republic has "become" a democracy in which total dependency (a need for a substance so strong that it becomes necessary to have this substance to function properly) upon THE STATE has been, and relentlessly continues to be engineered, largely by a BANK

bank
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English banc bench, from Anglo-French, of Germanic origin; akin to Old English benc
Date:
1614

a group or series of objects arranged together in a row or a tier

of war financiers/investors/profiteers, to color self-reliant, self-accounting INDEPENDENCE with self-doubt, illegality, and even criminality?

A republican form of government means a republic.

In a republic the administration of affairs is open to all CITIZENS©.

A court is a republican institution where affairs are administered.

You must administer your affairs of court yourself or waive this right.

Tory Loyalist private monopoly trade guild BAR Association bastard attorney/"lawyers" ply their pernicious occupation of entrapment ONLY along one edge of, and in two corners of, a republican institution where affairs are administered, wherein they are confined.

When you invoke a court you must assert your jurisdiction to hold it and cannot let the judge usurp your judicial power.

This means you do not pay an attorney fee to him to conduct your court, you do not submit documents to him for his approval, you do not motion him to move your court, you deny everything he has tried to file and you strike anything that he has attempted to enter of record.

He will not like you.

You are not trying to make friends with him.

Without the judge you can eject attorneys and enter your own orders including a declaratory judgment if no other party appears for court in person.

How, precisely, is it other than that so called "judges" as well as "prosecutors," "public defenders," and their "private" re-pre-sent-at-ion-al ilk ALL are no more than Tory Loyalist private monopoly trade guild BAR Association bastard attorney/"lawyers," colluding amongst themselves (sharing in the ill-gotten profits of a common INTEREST), to "shield" their targets from OWN-ER-SHIP of self-sufficiency, impartiality, integrity, rights, and anything else they can get their greed-soiled hands on?

46 Then he sayde: Wo be to you also ye lawears: for ye lade men with burthens greveous to be borne and ye youre selves touche not ye packes wt one of youre fyngers.
47 Wo be to you: ye bylde the sepulchres of the Prophetes and youre fathers killed them
48 truly ye beare witnes that ye alowe the dedes of youre fathers for they kylled them and ye bylde their sepulchres.


52 Wo be to you lawears: for ye have taken awaye ye keye of knowledge ye entred not in youre selves and them that came in ye forbade.
53 When he thus spake vnto them the lawears and the Pharises began to wexe busye about him and to stop his mouth with many questions
54 layinge wayte for him and sekinge to catche somethinge of his mought wherby they might accuse him.

World's Shortest Political Quiz:

Should a service or product be provided at the barrel of a gun?
O Yes
O No

It would appear that quasimodo does not intend to re-pre-sent himself, but that he IS himself.

[quasimodo]

Thanks MRG.
Due strictly to my own ignorance I unknowingly did wrong. I made right that which I made wrong, and the court finally recognized that as fact dismissing the charges, and did not generate revenue in my name(sic). Not to my knowledge that is.
Thats all I wanted.