Quote:
Williams' troubling story provokes discomfort in a nation that prides itself on a justice system where the accused are innocent until proven guilty.
By Thom Patterson
|
CNN.com is outright LYING, they are liars.
First, there is no "justice system," none.
There IS, however, a SYSTEM, but it hardly involves JUSTICE.
(And NO, being "freed" after 22 years is NOT justice.)
Second, there is no "accused," there is "defendant," which term appears nowhere in "...this Constitution for the United States of America."
Third, and most insulting, there is NO SUCH THING as "innocent until proven guilty" in the so-called nation said to "pride itself" on this non-existent bit of propaganda.
"Not guilty," IMPLIES that their IS guilt, just by association with the word, AND forces that the "notness" of the predetermined guilt must be proven by the "defendant."
That is very very far removed from actually being "innocent until proven guilty."
The author of this propaganda is a LIAR; the so-called "justice" "system" DOES NOT work the way he states it does.
One is GUILTY until one PROVES the "notness" of the guilt that has been attached.
Quote:
A jury of Williams' peers convicted him in the April 5, 1985
By Thom Patterson
|
Quote:
Peers.
...the vassals of a lord who sat in his court as judges of their co-vassals...
Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition
|
"...jury of...peers," is also nowhere to be found within "...this Constitution for the United States of America."
What is to be found is far different: "In
all criminal prosecutions, the
accused shall
enjoy the right to a speedy and
public trial, by an
IMPARTIAL jury..."
The Constitutional jury,
in all parts (im-part-ial), is complete in and of itself.
Nowhere is a JUDGE made PART-Y to the proceedings of a "trial, by an IMPARTIAL jury..."
A BAR Association
private trade guild
bastard attorney dressed in the cassock of religious clergy sitting six feet above everyone in the room, and bald faced ASSUMING the Power to DICTATE "law," and tailor "evidence," to a "jury of peers" (vassals of a lord), constitutes a PRIVATE, rather than a PUBLIC proceeding, and is repugnant to the Constitution, if not treasonous.
Quote:
bas·tard
Pronunciation: \ˈbas-tərd\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, probably of Germanic origin; akin to Old Frisian bost marriage, Old English bindan to bind
Date:14th century
1: an illegitimate child
2: something that is spurious, irregular, inferior, or of questionable origin
Merriam Webster's Online Dictionary
|
Innocent man free after 22 years
