Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Articles > Office of Information Retrieval
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-24-2008, 06:28 PM
Jerry Pitts Jerry Pitts is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,134
Attorney Scott (Lawdog) ?

Let us see: Lawdog (now identified as “Scott”) has previously stipulated that he is
Occupying space in the Oakland area(s) of California; that he is an attorney registered with that Bar Association. Now is “Scott” his middle name, first name; is he actually retired, active, or inactive; is this “Scott” male or female (this last question is based on the fact that 2 of the members listed below are female with a “Scott” portion of the name and not necessarily a ‘surname’.

Andrew Scott MacKay Active 197074 Oakland December 1998
B. Scott Levine Active 104632 Oakland December 1982
Bruce Scott Lymburn Active 104659 Oakland December 1982
C Scott Anderson Jr Inactive 20206 Oakland January 1949
Catharine Scott Langer Active 214748 Oakland October 2001
Christophe Scott Taylor Inactive 78386 Oakland December 1977
Christopher Scott Taylor Inactive 78386 Oakland December 1977
David Scott Saunders Active 184196 Oakland December 1996
David Scott Wilgus Active 219181 Oakland May 2002
Eliot Scott Gorson Active 99717 Oakland December 1981
Jeffrey Scott Sloan Active 154487 Oakland December 1991
Jeffrey Scott Wood Active 136306 Oakland December 1988
Michael Scott Daw Inactive 99596 Oakland December 1981
Michael Scott Ellis Active 199820 Oakland December 1998
Michael Scott Lubofsky Active 214060 Oakland June 2001
Michael Scott McCormick Active 77355 Oakland December 1977
Milton Scott Hamilton Deceased 6628 Oakland April 1899
Patricia Scott Brody Active 70275 Oakland December 1976
Phillip Scott Campbell Active 191270 Oakland December 1997
Robert Scott Fletcher Active 239808 Oakland December 2005
Rodney Scott Low Inactive 83663 Oakland November 1978
Roger Scott Sampson Active 161285 Oakland December 1992
Ronald Scott Rosen Resigned 83748 Oakland November 1978
Scott Andrew Bonzell Active 124160 Oakland December 1986
Scott J. Borrowman Active 241021 Oakland December 2005
Scott Edward Cole Active 160744 Oakland December 1992
Scott Campbell Finch Active 83406 Oakland November 1978
Scott Patrick Fleming Active 206748 Oakland June 2000
Scott Eugene Gilpin Active 133782 Oakland June 1988
Scott Benjamin Jackson Active 191401 Oakland December 1997

Scott Douglas Kellogg Deceased 18171 Oakland December 1943
Scott David Long Active 203505 Oakland December 1999
Scott Leo Massoni Active 240496 Oakland December 2005
Scott Andrew Mossman Active 227178 Oakland December 2003
Scott Douglas Patton Active 148468 Oakland December 1990
Scott Alexander Swisher Active 121271 Oakland December 1985
Scott Bryan Willoughby Active 209032 Oakland December 2000
Scott Alan Winne Inactive 200213 Oakland January 1999
Scott Justin Yundt Active 242595 Oakland June 2006
Susan Scott Eadie Active 201104 Oakland June 1999
Wynne Scott Furth Active 56397 Oakland November 1973

Can you give us another clue Scott/Lawdog?


Jerry Carlos
__________________
Summa Ratio est quae pro Religione facit.
If ever the laws of God and man are at variance, the former are to be obeyed in derogation of the latter.

'Many are the plans in a man's heart,
but it's the Lord's purpose that prevails."
Proverbs 19:21.

"The most important office in a democracy is the office of citizen."
Louis Brandeis, U.S. Supreme Court Justice (1916-1939) referring to the responsibility of voters.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-24-2008, 06:54 PM
theghost theghost is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 228
That's funny, I was just reading the "certificate of search" thread, where lawdog specifically stated that he was from Georgia, and that he was NOT from California, nor did he ever plan to go there or practice law there.....hmmmm.

In fact, here's that quote:

"How they do it in California is only of academic interest to me, because I don't live there, I don't engage in the practice of law there, and I have no intention of doing either."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-24-2008, 07:01 PM
Jerry Pitts Jerry Pitts is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by theghost
That's funny, I was just reading the "certificate of search" thread, where lawdog specifically stated that he was from Georgia, and that he was NOT from California, nor did he ever plan to go there or practice law there.....hmmmm.

In fact, here's that quote:

"How they do it in California is only of academic interest to me, because I don't live there, I don't engage in the practice of law there, and I have no intention of doing either."

Lawdog, to my understanding of the other readers comments, has a long list of aliases that have been used on this board. It was under one of those aliases where the reference to California was picked up.

Jerry Carlos
__________________
Summa Ratio est quae pro Religione facit.
If ever the laws of God and man are at variance, the former are to be obeyed in derogation of the latter.

'Many are the plans in a man's heart,
but it's the Lord's purpose that prevails."
Proverbs 19:21.

"The most important office in a democracy is the office of citizen."
Louis Brandeis, U.S. Supreme Court Justice (1916-1939) referring to the responsibility of voters.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-24-2008, 07:36 PM
Jerry Pitts Jerry Pitts is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,134
Oh My Goodness! What if I am mistaken about either the location or the use of aliases. That would seemingly create a real problem.

so based on your astute observation regarding Lawdog saying he does not and would not practice in California, but rather in the state of Georgia, I took the liberty of assessing some of the names in the Georgia Bar, and the same questions would still apply. BTW, there are 243 names in the GA Bar bearing the name "Scott". Which one is the "Scott" on this forum. Evasive, is he NOT?

Mr. Richard Scott Abram Atlanta, GA
Mr. Richard Scott Alembik Decatur, GA
Mr. Scott J. Arnold Atlanta, GA
Mr. Matthew Scott Atkins Atlanta, GA
Mr. William Scott Baker Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Arthur Ball Gainesville, GA
Mr. Scott Andrews Barber Atlanta, GA
Mr. Howell Scott Basham Athens, GA
Mr. Scott M. Bryant Atlanta, GA
Mr. Kevin Scott Cauley Cairo, GA
Mr. Brian Scott Cohen Austell, GA
Mr. Christopher Scott Cooper Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Mason Dixon Atlanta, GA
Mr. Ted Scott Duncan Lawrenceville, GA
Mr. Michael Scott Evans Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Alan Fisher Atlanta, GA
Ms. Karen Scott Greene Snellville, GA
Mr. Scott Tyler Hastey Marietta, GA
Mr. Scott Allen Hodgin Statesboro, GA
Mr. Tyler Scott Hoyt Alpharetta, GA
Mr. Gillen Scott Joachim Atlanta, GA
Mr. Andrew Scott Johnson Hinesville, GA
Mr. Scott A. Johnson Toledo, OH
Mr. Scott J. Klosinski Augusta, GA
Mr. Michael Scott Lanier Lilburn, GA
Mr. Charles Scott Logan Atlanta, GA
Mr. Raymond Scott Martin Atlanta, GA
Mr. Larry Scott Mayfield Barnesville, GA
Mr. Scott Harold Michalove Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Liebschutz Nathan Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Patrick Newland Douglasville, GA
Mr. Scott Alton Roland Macon, GA
Mr. W. Scott Schulten Atlanta, GA
Mr. Henry Pearce Scott Valdosta, GA
Mr. Leonard Alan Scott Decatur, GA
Mr. Bradley Scott Shilling Duluth, GA
Mr. Trent Scott Shuping Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Linden Smith Duluth, GA
Mr. Scott Macdonald Smith Rome, GA
Mr. Scott A. Specht Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Preston Willis Monroe, GA


Jerry Carlos
__________________
Summa Ratio est quae pro Religione facit.
If ever the laws of God and man are at variance, the former are to be obeyed in derogation of the latter.

'Many are the plans in a man's heart,
but it's the Lord's purpose that prevails."
Proverbs 19:21.

"The most important office in a democracy is the office of citizen."
Louis Brandeis, U.S. Supreme Court Justice (1916-1939) referring to the responsibility of voters.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-24-2008, 09:47 PM
Lawdog Lawdog is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 631
nope

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts
Lawdog, to my understanding of the other readers comments, has a long list of aliases that have been used on this board. It was under one of those aliases where the reference to California was picked up.

Jerry Carlos

Totally incorrect. I have never said I am in California. I spent a week visiting the Oakland/San Fran area one summer, but I've never lived there, never worked there, and don't plan to do either.

Reading comprehension. It's fundamental.

And I have no "long list of aliases." I previously posted as UGA Lawdog until I got banned. weishaupt apparently decided to let me post again, hence the slightly changed moniker.

But unless you see it under the heading Lawdog or UGA Lawdog, I didn't write it.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-24-2008, 09:58 PM
Lawdog Lawdog is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 631
which one

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts
Oh My Goodness! What if I am mistaken about either the location or the use of aliases. That would seemingly create a real problem.

so based on your astute observation regarding Lawdog saying he does not and would not practice in California, but rather in the state of Georgia, I took the liberty of assessing some of the names in the Georgia Bar, and the same questions would still apply. BTW, there are 243 names in the GA Bar bearing the name "Scott". Which one is the "Scott" on this forum. Evasive, is he NOT?

Mr. Richard Scott Abram Atlanta, GA
Mr. Richard Scott Alembik Decatur, GA
Mr. Scott J. Arnold Atlanta, GA
Mr. Matthew Scott Atkins Atlanta, GA
Mr. William Scott Baker Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Arthur Ball Gainesville, GA
Mr. Scott Andrews Barber Atlanta, GA
Mr. Howell Scott Basham Athens, GA
Mr. Scott M. Bryant Atlanta, GA
Mr. Kevin Scott Cauley Cairo, GA
Mr. Brian Scott Cohen Austell, GA
Mr. Christopher Scott Cooper Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Mason Dixon Atlanta, GA
Mr. Ted Scott Duncan Lawrenceville, GA
Mr. Michael Scott Evans Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Alan Fisher Atlanta, GA
Ms. Karen Scott Greene Snellville, GA
Mr. Scott Tyler Hastey Marietta, GA
Mr. Scott Allen Hodgin Statesboro, GA
Mr. Tyler Scott Hoyt Alpharetta, GA
Mr. Gillen Scott Joachim Atlanta, GA
Mr. Andrew Scott Johnson Hinesville, GA
Mr. Scott A. Johnson Toledo, OH
Mr. Scott J. Klosinski Augusta, GA
Mr. Michael Scott Lanier Lilburn, GA
Mr. Charles Scott Logan Atlanta, GA
Mr. Raymond Scott Martin Atlanta, GA
Mr. Larry Scott Mayfield Barnesville, GA
Mr. Scott Harold Michalove Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Liebschutz Nathan Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Patrick Newland Douglasville, GA
Mr. Scott Alton Roland Macon, GA
Mr. W. Scott Schulten Atlanta, GA
Mr. Henry Pearce Scott Valdosta, GA
Mr. Leonard Alan Scott Decatur, GA
Mr. Bradley Scott Shilling Duluth, GA
Mr. Trent Scott Shuping Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Linden Smith Duluth, GA
Mr. Scott Macdonald Smith Rome, GA
Mr. Scott A. Specht Atlanta, GA
Mr. Scott Preston Willis Monroe, GA


Jerry Carlos

Shoonra knows which of these I am. I would prefer that he not specify which one, because some of you folks are nuts and I'd rather you not know what part of the state I'm in, but since he's both an attorney and a law librarian, I am sure he can verify my bona fides if he wants to.

I guess you'll have to ask him nicely.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-24-2008, 11:08 PM
Jerry Pitts Jerry Pitts is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Shoonra knows which of these I am. I would prefer that he not specify which one, because some of you folks are nuts and I'd rather you not know what part of the state I'm in, but since he's both an attorney and a law librarian, I am sure he can verify my bona fides if he wants to.

I guess you'll have to ask him nicely.

Geee Scott (?), I must apologize for the lapse in memory. perhaps it was stipulated by you that the stay in Oakland was only temporary.. I read something to that regard rather hastily and was more interested in more important matters at the time.

At any rate, your posting above, clearly shows that, IF you are in fact an attorney and a classic example of the attorney mentality, you at the least are running fearfully. Why else would you make such a suggestion in regards to keeping your location secret from some of those that are "nuts"? Speaking for myself, that type of activity is forbidden by the Laws of God, and besides, I don't own any type of firearms but do have some swords around the house. Can you imagine someone taking a knife to a gunfight? Kind of a silly thought if you ask me. Just as silly as an attorney who is bound by his/her oath to 'zealously' defend his/her client, running scared of someone that he/she might have provided ineffective assistance of counsel. I mean, after all, attorneys as agents of the court, are protected by the strong militaristic arm of the state police power. Have you no confidence in your protectors? Comical if you ask me.

Jerry Carlos
__________________
Summa Ratio est quae pro Religione facit.
If ever the laws of God and man are at variance, the former are to be obeyed in derogation of the latter.

'Many are the plans in a man's heart,
but it's the Lord's purpose that prevails."
Proverbs 19:21.

"The most important office in a democracy is the office of citizen."
Louis Brandeis, U.S. Supreme Court Justice (1916-1939) referring to the responsibility of voters.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-25-2008, 04:37 AM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is online now
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Shoonra knows which of these I am.

I would prefer that he not specify which one, because some of you folks are nuts and I'd rather you not know what part of the state I'm in, but since he's both an attorney and a law librarian, I am sure he can verify my bona fides if he wants to.

Who is "Shoonra?"

Can you/will you prove that this "Shoonra" is also actually an "attorney" or "lawyer" and "law librarian" as is your latest claim?

Having repeatedly defaulted on proof of your own now decidedly spurious claim, how can this latest claim be taken seriously without your proving it as well?

You have made yet another claim.

Will you now prove it?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-25-2008, 04:48 AM
Lawdog Lawdog is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 631
bottom line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts
Just as silly as an attorney who is bound by his/her oath to 'zealously' defend his/her client, running scared of someone that he/she might have provided ineffective assistance of counsel. I mean, after all, attorneys as agents of the court, are protected by the strong militaristic arm of the state police power. Have you no confidence in your protectors? Comical if you ask me.
Jerry Carlos

First of all, as the courts have repeatedly ruled, the police have no liability if they fail to protect you from crime. Police protection is a luxury, not a right. I may be an "officer of the court", but I don't have any sheriff's deputies serving as my bodyguards. If you think that attorneys are entitled to some special level of police protection just for being attorneys, the only thing "comical" is your lack of understanding of the legal system.

"Ineffective assistance of counsel"? There is no attorney-client relationship between me and anyone at Sui Juris. I never, at any time, agreed to represent any of you. To the extent that I am able, I provide advice for free, for which most of you condemn me. But if ANY of you think that ANY sort of attorney-client relationship exists, let me disabuse you of that right now: NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP EXISTS, OR HAS EVER EXISTED, BETWEEN ME AND ANY OTHER POSTER ON THIS WEBSITE. (That's why I often end my advice with "seek a lawyer in your jurisdiction", ya know? Because they need one, it's not me, and it's not going to be me.)

No, the reason I don't want anyone other than Shoonra knowing exactly who I am is because there are a few people on this board who I sincerely believe are mentally ill, and crazy people have been known to do crazy things. I own a gun and have a license to carry it concealed. I've taken lots of martial arts over the years. I'm a big boy and can look after myself. But only a fool invites unnecessary trouble.

Bottom line: Shoonra is certainly capable of verifying who I am, if he chooses to do so. He certainly is under no obligation to do so, to me or you or anyone else. So if you really want to know for sure that I'm an attorney at law, you'll have to ask him nicely.

The reason I don't care all that much is because I know for a fact I'm an attorney, and nothing that some drunken, obnoxious twit on here says or believes is going to change that.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).

Last edited by Lawdog : 04-25-2008 at 04:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-25-2008, 08:19 AM
Jerry Pitts Jerry Pitts is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog

"Ineffective assistance of counsel"? There is no attorney-client relationship between me and anyone at Sui Juris. I never, at any time, agreed to represent any of you. To the extent that I am able, I provide advice for free, for which most of you condemn me. But if ANY of you think that ANY sort of attorney-client relationship exists, let me disabuse you of that right now: NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP EXISTS, OR HAS EVER EXISTED, BETWEEN ME AND ANY OTHER POSTER ON THIS WEBSITE. (That's why I often end my advice with "seek a lawyer in your jurisdiction", ya know? Because they need one, it's not me, and it's not going to be me.)

Without having absolute verifiable PROOF of (the above bold text) the TRUE calling of each and every man and woman on this forum, how can you make such a claim?

I am ALMOST certain that a lot of your clients when frequenting places on the internet, have used 'fictitious' stage names and possibly have even used some icon to exemplify those stage names. This claim of yours is most certainly without merit.

Jerry Carlos
__________________
Summa Ratio est quae pro Religione facit.
If ever the laws of God and man are at variance, the former are to be obeyed in derogation of the latter.

'Many are the plans in a man's heart,
but it's the Lord's purpose that prevails."
Proverbs 19:21.

"The most important office in a democracy is the office of citizen."
Louis Brandeis, U.S. Supreme Court Justice (1916-1939) referring to the responsibility of voters.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scott Peterson's ex-girlfriend opens a spa Archibald 'Harry' Tuttle Office of Information Retrieval 0 07-01-2007 03:51 AM
Scott Peterson has a new pen pal Archibald 'Harry' Tuttle Office of Information Retrieval 2 05-29-2006 06:59 PM
Scott Peterson has a new pen pal -- a juror Archibald 'Harry' Tuttle Office of Information Retrieval 0 05-27-2006 11:43 PM
Dred Scott REDCLOUD Citizenship & Jurisdiction 2 02-14-2006 08:08 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:18 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer