Office of Information Retrieval Latest news and information gathered by our Information Retrieval agents throughout the web


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Articles > Articles & News > Office of Information Retrieval
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-05-2006, 02:58 AM
fulltitle's Avatar
fulltitle fulltitle is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: kingdom of heaven
Posts: 1,565
"U.S. House Approves 'Child Strip Search' Bill"

Without Prejudice.
Quote:
A bill approved by the U.S. House yesterday would require school districts around the country to establish policies making it easier for teachers and school officials to conduct wide scale searches of students. These searches could take the form of pat-downs, bag searches, or strip searches depending on how administrators interpret the law.[more]

I guess they dont need candy anymore?
__________________
All rights reserved. No Liability Assumed. No Value Assured. Without Recourse. Private. Not for hire.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2006, 06:12 AM
aksis's Avatar
aksis aksis is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Universal Kingdom of God; Earth
Posts: 1,111
Here's the bill:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...bill=h109-5295


Introduced:May 4, 2006
Sponsor:Rep. Geoff Davis [R-KY]
Status:Passed House

109TH CONGRESS H. R. 5295
2D SESSION

AN ACT
To protect students and teachers.
1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 2
2 This Act may be cited as the ``Student and Teacher
3 Safety Act of 2006''.
4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
5 Congress finds the following:
6 (1) The United States Department of Edu-
7 cation's National Center for Education Statistics re-
8 ported in the 2005 Indicators of School Crime and
9 Safety that in 2003 seventeen percent of students in
10 grades 9-12 reported they carried a weapon. Six per-
11 cent reported having carried a weapon on school
12 grounds.
13 (2) The same survey reported that 29 percent
14 of all students in grades 9-12 reported that someone
15 offered, sold, or gave them an illegal drug on school
16 property within the last 12 months.
17 (3) The United States Constitution's Fourth
18 Amendment guarantees ``the right of the people to
19 be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and ef-
20 fects, against unreasonable searches and seizures''.
21 (4) That while the Supreme Court affirmed the
22 Fourth Amendment's application to students in pub-
23 lic schools in New Jersey vs. TLO (1985), the Court
24 held that searches of students by school officials do
25 not require warrants issued by judges showing prob-


HR 5295 EH 3
1 able cause. The Court will ordinarily hold that such
2 a search is permissible if--
3 (A) there are reasonable grounds for sus-
4 pecting the search will reveal evidence that the
5 student violated the law or school rules; and
6 (B) the measures used to conduct the
7 search are reasonably related to the search's ob-
8 jectives, without being excessively intrusive in
9 light of the student's age, sex, and nature of
10 the offense.
11 (5) The Supreme Court held in Board of Edu-
12 cation of Independent Sch. Dist. 92 of Pottawatomie
13 County vs. Earls (2002) that random drug testing
14 of students who were participating in extracurricular
15 activities was reasonable and did not violate the
16 Fourth Amendment. The Court stated that such
17 search policies effectively serve the School Districts
18 interest in protecting its students' health and safety.
19 SEC. 3. SEARCHES BASED ON REASONABLE SUSPICION.

20 (a) IN GENERAL.--Each local educational agency
21 shall have in effect throughout the jurisdiction of the
22 agency policies that ensure that a search described in sub-
23 section (b) is deemed reasonable and permissible.
24 (b) SEARCHES COVERED.--A search referred to in
25 subsection (a) is a search by a full-time teacher or school


HR 5295 EH 4
1 official, acting on any reasonable suspicion based on pro-
2 fessional experience and judgment, of any minor student
3 on the grounds of any public school, if the search is con-
4 ducted to ensure that classrooms, school buildings, school
5 property and students remain free from the threat of all
6 weapons, dangerous materials, or illegal narcotics. The
7 measures used to conduct any search must be reasonably
8 related to the search's objectives, without being excessively
9 intrusive in light of the student's age, sex, and the nature
10 of the offense.
11 SEC. 4. ENCOURAGEMENT TO PROTECT STUDENTS AND
12 TEACHERS.
13 (a) IN GENERAL.--A local educational agency that
14 fails to comply with section 3 shall not, during the period
15 of noncompliance, receive any Safe and Drug Free School
16 funds after fiscal year 2008.
17 (b) DEFINITION.--In this section, the term ``Safe and
18 Drug Free School funds'' includes any funds under Part
19 A of Title IV of the Elementary and Secondary Education
20 Act of 1965.
Passed the House of Representatives September 19,
2006.
Attest:




Clerk.
HR 5295 EH
109TH CONGRESS H. R. 5295
2D SESSION AN ACT
To protect students and teachers.
__________________
Note: It is a custom recognized by many People to use a ":" (colon) between one's name and their FAMILY name, and is used to segregate the name pertaining to the natural sovereign man, "Christopher Theodore," from the FAMILY name, "RHODES" (an implied trust), and further, both from the name of the implied constructive trust resulting from the workings of the New Deal, "CHRISTOPHER THEODORE RHODES."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2006, 07:55 AM
Ice's Avatar
Ice Ice is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,866
Note how they threaten with the withholding of federal funds if they do not put this program into place.

Screw 'em.

"Home school" is the BEST school!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2006, 08:04 AM
aksis's Avatar
aksis aksis is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Universal Kingdom of God; Earth
Posts: 1,111
Also the way The Supreme Court side steps the 4th is note worthy.

Quote:
21 (4) That while the Supreme Court affirmed the
22 Fourth Amendment's application to students in pub-
23 lic schools in New Jersey vs. TLO (1985), the Court
24 held that searches of students by school officials do
25 not require warrants issued by judges showing prob-


HR 5295 EH 3
1 able cause.
__________________
Note: It is a custom recognized by many People to use a ":" (colon) between one's name and their FAMILY name, and is used to segregate the name pertaining to the natural sovereign man, "Christopher Theodore," from the FAMILY name, "RHODES" (an implied trust), and further, both from the name of the implied constructive trust resulting from the workings of the New Deal, "CHRISTOPHER THEODORE RHODES."

Last edited by aksis : 10-05-2006 at 08:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Indiana's Shame Teardrops For Katelynn rsvp Court 29 07-31-2008 10:51 AM
The Federal Reserve Cartel Exposed: not money - debt notes, i.e. Unconstitutional! Sharing Lights Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 380 01-28-2008 06:48 PM
Lawsuit for Interference with Custody??? gatorguy3 Court 10 10-29-2007 06:02 PM
How the Government Creates Child Abuse planetmark Family Rights 15 04-21-2006 07:17 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer