|
MARK OF THE BEAST
Do any of you consider the Mark of the Beast to be related to SSN's and nom de'guerre (war name)/fiction/strawman/commercial entity signatures? Is it possible the disception was foisted upon us long ago when we "accpeted" the fraudulent terms of the contracts with the SSA / IRS / Fed (banking)? Afterall, without an SSN and signature, one cannot legally bank. And if one cannot bank, one cannot legally buy or sell (with no cash(fiat)/credit). Weren't illiterates (incompetents, having no formal signature/appellation) asked to set their "mark" upon various contracts of long ago (see the scene of enlisting men in the movie "The Patriot"); and, aren't legal entities (strawmen) considered by courts to be Incompetent? Can it be construed that the Mark of the Beast is the strawman signature, and the number of his name be his "SSN"? Can it be the "Mark of the Beast" is not a literal mark of the Beast; but, rather, figuratively, a mark of the Beast. What say you?
|