Beat All Traffic Tickets

[Skeptic]

Yes I am, actually. I'm telling you the advice on Sui Juris is BS that never works. It's mental mastrubations, completely useless in the real world.

That WILL help you if you listen to it.

Lawyerdude and others, on the other hand, count on people here--rightly or wrongly--falling for every half-baked "legal theory" that "proves" they don't have to obey laws they don't like.

Following them WILL NOT help you.

[freeindeed]

What you spout is BS. At least people on this site are for freedom. At least we are searching for truth, you wouldn't know it if it bit you in the arse. All here see right through your tripe. I have nothing against you just what you preach. Leave us in peace and go back to Quatloos where you belong.

[Akira]

IMHO, you're doing yourself a disservice.

Anyone who chronicly uses 'absolutes' in their speech is (almost) always wrong.

In a world full of dichotomies, nothing is absolute.

Blanket dismissals are generally the tool of hypocrits, and/or fanatics.

To suggest "everything" on this site "never works" is simply absurd.


For HIS Glory,
Akira

[idknow]

Originally Posted by Skeptic

Folks we have our differences, but Lawyerdude is a nasty piece
of work. He was disbarred for using LSD and other such nice actions, and is now
reduced to try and make a living from practicing law without a license by
e-mail and on the 'net.

[...]
Nice guy.

Skeptic, respectfully, your charges are quite serious and I believe all the
Members of the Forum require proof of your statement of why LawyerDude was
disbarred.

thank you.

[Akira]

With all do respect.. and speaking only for myself...

It's none of my business, nor do I care.

For HIS Glory,
Akira

[freeindeed]

Originally Posted by Akira

With all do respect.. and speaking only for myself...

It's none of my business, nor do I care.

For HIS Glory,
Akira

Ditto Akira!!

[hardtoremember]

Originally Posted by Skeptic

It's mental mastrubations, completely useless in the real world.

AAAAAHhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Who cares!!!! I feels soooooo good! I just cant stop doing it!!! Aaaahhhhh I'm stroking my mind with knowledge..... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! !!!!!!!!!!


HTR

[charlesa6]

Originally Posted by Skeptic

Yes I am, actually. I'm telling you the advice on Sui Juris is BS that never works. It's mental mastrubations, completely useless in the real world.

That WILL help you if you listen to it.

Lawyerdude and others, on the other hand, count on people here--rightly or wrongly--falling for every half-baked "legal theory" that "proves" they don't have to obey laws they don't like.

Following them WILL NOT help you.

Speculation! Sustain! Who cares, speak for yourself.

[Skeptic]

Originally Posted by charlesa6

Speculation! Sustain! Who cares, speak for yourself.

Let's put it this way:

Only during the last week or two, we had the following posters on Sui Juris:

1). A poster who followed the "ticket busting" advice on Sui Juris of telling the judge he has no authority who ended up in the psych ward.

2). Another poster who tried the same trick and brought "five witnesses", only to have the judge ignore the nonsense and set a trial date anyway.

3). A third who thinks that if he claims that there was no marriage between him and his wife, this magically means family court has no juristriction even if his wife has evidence they were married. He is certain to lose the case since we have one side (the wife) presenting factual evidence and his side saying "you can't touch me, I said the magic word 'no juristriction', neener neener".

4). A fourth who thinks he could get out of jury duty with the same "no juristriction" trick, despite the fact that others noted this trick often results in contempt charges.

5). A "victory" for the Sui Juris method when someone only lost his case and was got a criminal conviction and a criminal record and probation and not also jail time.

Yeah, your legal methods are a great success, aren't they?

[freeindeed]

Originally Posted by Skeptic

Let's put it this way:

Only during the last week or two, we had the following posters on Sui Juris:

1). A poster who followed the "ticket busting" advice on Sui Juris of telling the judge he has no authority who ended up in the psych ward. I missed that one. Would you care to show me where this happened?

2). Another poster who tried the same trick and brought "five witnesses", only to have the judge ignore the nonsense and set a trial date anyway. So what, a trial date was set. I have a very close friend that had a trial date set and he won. So a date was set what is your point?

3). A third who thinks that if he claims that there was no marriage between him and his wife, this magically means family court has no juristriction even if his wife has evidence they were married. He is certain to lose the case since we have one side (the wife) presenting factual evidence and his side saying "you can't touch me, I said the magic word 'no juristriction', neener neener". I have no first hand knowledge, do you? Do you know the outcome? Were or are you there to observe first hand what, if anything, took place?

4). A fourth who thinks he could get out of jury duty with the same "no juristriction" trick, despite the fact that others noted this trick often results in contempt charges. That is an easy one. Just tell the judge you are an informed juror and you would rule on both the law and the facts. EXCUSED!!! Worked for me.

5). A "victory" for the Sui Juris method when someone only lost his case and was got a criminal conviction and a criminal record and probation and not also jail time. Like I said here with what the guy was facing it sure looked like a victory to me.

Yeah, your legal methods are a great success, aren't they?

Tell me do you even know what real success is? I bet you base it on a world view.