Go Back   Suijuris Forums > General Discussion > Service Providers
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-21-2005, 09:52 PM
Dragon
 
Posts: n/a
Oh yeah, Mr. Buck09...

Here is an opinion from the State Attorney General on my work...I guess I am still just like scumbag lawyers ain't I? 'Course you'll probably say that I left something out or pick this apart won't you? FYI...We file "Head of Family" affidavits all of the time in every county. Never questioned. Of course, they go in the court case file, but why not attempt to make it public record?

WE PREVAILED>>>>SUCCESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :grin:

Here is the (entire )response from the attorney general himself!
#################################################

Florida Attorney General
Advisory Legal Opinion
Number: AGO 2005-17
Date: March 29, 2005
Subject: Official records, recording documents

The Honorable David R. Ellspermann
Clerk of the Circuit Court
Marion County
Post Office Box 1030
Ocala, Florida 34478-1030

RE: CLERK OF COURTS–OFFICIAL RECORDS–HOMESTEAD DECLARATIONS–authority of clerk of courts to record declarations of homestead and head of household affidavits. ss. 28.222 and 222.01, F.S.

Dear Mr. Ellspermann:

You ask substantially the following question:

Does a "Designation of Homestead" or "Head of Family Affidavit" created by an individual and offered for recording in the Official Records comply with the statutory requirements for recording under Florida law?

You have provided copies of a "Designation of Homestead" and a "Head of Family Affidavit" that was presented to your office for recording, but refused due to their not being in compliance with Florida Statutes. The individual has complained to this office regarding your failure to record the documents he has offered. You have asked this office to determine whether the documents provided meet the statutory requirements for recording.

Initially, I would note that this office has no enforcement powers over the clerks of courts of this state, nor can we make factual determinations as to whether a particular document may be recorded. It is the duty of the clerk of court to make such a determination, and in the event an individual claims that the clerk has failed to carry out his or her ministerial duty to record a document, the aggrieved individual may seek a mandamus order compelling the clerk to act.[1]

Section 28.222, Florida Statutes, provides that the clerk of court "shall be the recorder of all instruments that he or she may be required or authorized by law to record in the county where he or she is clerk."[2] The statute enumerates certain instruments that must be recorded and recognizes the clerk's responsibility to record, upon payment of the service charges prescribed by law, "any other instruments required or authorized by law to be recorded."[3] It has been the position of this office that the clerk of court is a ministerial officer whose authority and responsibility are derived from both constitutional and statutory provisions.[4] Thus, this office has determined that if an instrument is entitled to be recorded, it must be recorded by the clerk if properly executed and upon payment of the clerk's fee.[5] In performing this duty, the clerk of circuit court acts in a purely ministerial capacity and has no discretion.[6]

However, this office has also stated that the clerk of court may not accept for recording in the official records any document that the law does not authorize or require him or her to record. In Attorney General Opinion 90-69, this office considered whether the clerk of court must record documents not identified in section 28.222, Florida Statutes, such as living wills, child custody agreements between parties without court approval, foreign state birth certificates, foreign country birth certificates and documents in a foreign language without an English translation. The opinion focused on the limitation upon the authority of the clerk to perform only those duties authorized by law and recognized the statutory mandate that the clerk record "all instruments that he or she may be required or authorized by law to record in the county where he or she is clerk." Based on these considerations, this office concluded that the clerk is not authorized to record any document or instrument that is not specifically required or authorized to be recorded by section 28.222, Florida Statutes, or by any other provision of law.

Pertinent to your inquiry, section 222.01(1), Florida Statutes, states:

"Whenever any natural person residing in this state desires to avail himself or herself of the benefit of the provisions of the constitution and laws exempting property as a homestead from forced sale under any process of law, he or she may make a statement, in writing, containing a description of the real property, mobile home, or modular home claimed to be exempt and declaring that the real property, mobile home, or modular home is the homestead of the party in whose behalf such claim is being made. Such statement shall be signed by the person making it and shall be recorded in the circuit court." (e.s)

While section 222.01, Florida Statutes, does not prescribe a form to be used when making a declaration of homestead, it does set forth the necessary elements constituting a declaration of homestead.[7] To the extent the document presented by an individual for recording constitutes a "Declaration of Homestead" contemplated by section 222.01(1), Florida Statues, the clerk of court is required by law to record such document. However, the clerk's acceptance and recording of the document does not ensure the legal effect of such document. Rather, the clerk is merely performing his or her ministerial duty.

I have not found a statutory provision, nor has one been drawn to my attention, for a "Head of Family Affidavit" to be recorded by the clerk of court. As discussed above, absent such a statutory direction the clerk is not authorized to record such a document.

Sincerely,

Charlie Crist
Attorney General

CC/tls
-------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] See Melkonian v. Goldman, 647 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1994) (mandamus used to enforce established legal right by compelling person in official capacity to perform an indisputable ministerial duty required by law).

[2] Section 28.222(1), Fla. Stat.

[3] Section 28.222(3)(h), Fla. Stat.

[4] See Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 79-70 (1979); 86-38 (1986); 97-67 (1997) and 98-65 (1998). See also Alachua County v. Powers, 351 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1977).

[5] See Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 75-309 (1975) (clerk is required to record any deed properly executed upon proper payment of the clerk's service charge if such deed is otherwise entitled to be recorded under s. 28.222, Fla. Stat.). And see Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 67-6 (1967) (clerk has no duty, responsibility or authority to examine an instrument presented for filing to determine if the requisites of the Uniform Commercial Code have been met except that statute requires clerk to insure that instrument contains a statement to the effect that the documentary stamp tax has been paid).

[6] See Op. Att’y Gen. Fla. 91-18 (1991) and cases cited therein.

[7] Cf., e.g., LexisNexis Florida Real & Personal Property Forms, Form 14.01 Homestead Declaration, Where Property Has One Declared Owner.
__________________

Last edited by Dragon : 04-21-2005 at 09:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-22-2005, 05:15 AM
iamfreeru2 iamfreeru2 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,685
Talking

Just so you know the above was a direct response to my complaint made to the Florida Attorney General that the county recorder, Mr Ellspermann, would not file my Designation of Homestead. My Designation of Homestead was filed as a result of my complaint.

Last edited by iamfreeru2 : 04-22-2005 at 05:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-22-2005, 04:02 PM
Dragon
 
Posts: n/a
I am glad I could help IAMFREERU2. I am also proud that you challenged Marion County and got a response. Shows their ignorance of the law. I have never had a problem with any other county. THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-22-2005, 08:03 PM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by buck09
I think the reason you left it out is because your site is set up to sell your materials.

B09, Mr. Simms has been MORE than generous w/me in sharing BOTH his time & resources AT NO CHARGE.
He has a real job and busts his tail & pocketbook on research material for the cause. Have you priced the entire statutes at large on CD lately, B09?
Have you busted your tail in formatting them so that they are word searchable?
Well John has & paid for it, too. He has tons to offer, but his charges are reasonable as he tries to break even.
His Motion for Particulars HOOKED ME UP in a traffic dismissal.


Quote:
Originally Posted by buck09
It's really quite funny.
B09, that statement indicates arrogance.
Every one wants to walk in honor, but you cannot walk in honor UNLESS you are humble FIRST.

Instead of your statement:

Quote:
Originally Posted by buck09
I don't see any reason why you wouldn't publish that last paragraph. However, not publishing it, without even noting that part of the opinion was omitted, seems to be to be extremely dishonest.

You could have, in a humble spirit, re-phrased it in this manner:
  • There was a paragraph omitted here it is: " . . . "

    I wonder what reasons he would have for omitting that last paragraph.

Then the ad-hominem attack equating John w/scumbag lawyers without really reading the impact of the case it sel, or even possibly Florida Homestead Laws, was not reasonable.

Anyway, I have said things towards people on this site which have warranted apology, and I have deleted those statements or edited them & have made the apology public.
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-22-2005, 08:12 PM
Dragon
 
Posts: n/a
He can get off his high horse...I fixed it...http://ww.netside.net/~c3i/fong.htm

Weiss, I haven't forgotten you man. Just need to get my new PC running good, and I will send you the 6th Congress 1st Session - Ch 59 - April 12 1939 pp. 575-577

John
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-22-2005, 08:49 PM
Freedomless's Avatar
Freedomless Freedomless is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Land Of Truth
Posts: 445
Most men and women who have used attorneys learn later that their money was wasted. Most attorneys will tell you up front that there are not guarantees. When there are laws in effect that state that there should be guarantees and you are given no guaranty, then you know that there is a problem with the legal system. I can't tell one single man or woman who is eager to hire an attorney. The attorneys have brought this upon themselves. So, John please don't take it personal. We remain gun shy and look to remedy ourselves.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-23-2005, 09:40 AM
Dragon
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for the support!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who really controls the "STRAWMAN"? suijuris Court 60 08-31-2008 09:01 AM
Contractor's licenses?? Rory Success Stories 243 01-15-2008 05:56 AM
What to say to a police officer when "pulled over" for... jmunson Travel 48 06-08-2005 06:33 PM
Affidavit of corporate denial wargames102 Court 9 05-08-2005 08:04 PM
Un-Social Security? In Freedoms Cause Citizenship & Jurisdiction 56 04-22-2005 08:32 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:34 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer