06-20-2005, 04:44 PM
|
 |
Sui Juris Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Akira
In a perfect world, that's true... I only wish it were that simple... the courts are full of deceit, fraud, nondisclosure and corruption, and, given the opportunity, judges will steamroll you, especially in family court, where there is rarely a record....
|
Hey... I never said it was a conspiracy... lol
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel
"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
Last edited by Akira : 06-20-2005 at 10:23 PM.
|
06-20-2005, 05:26 PM
|
|
|
|
Not this post, the earlier one.
Last edited by HenryBowman : 06-21-2005 at 03:23 AM.
|
06-20-2005, 05:38 PM
|
 |
The Outta Commissiona
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,417
|
|
To the SJ's
Without you, there would be no me
|
06-20-2005, 05:52 PM
|
|
The Outta Commissiona
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,417
|
|
Read Between the Lines
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by test
This seems to get a bit treaky, I think I read here in the suijuris web site that if you plead anything, you are waiving your restricted/special appearance and it is then turned into a general appearance, so what gives in this case.
|
This is all repaste from Clyde himself which I am posting.
You need to read it more closely to see where he is coming from.
You will NEVER have the (nature & cause) N&C explained to you. He is being somewhat veiled and sarcastic in regards to the initial sentence of pleaing NG(not guilty)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by test
Is there a way to defend agains the freaking thiefs entering a plea on your behalf?
|
Well, If you read AILL, the only way is to challenge them in open court when they do. the last judge entered it in secretly & I didn't know it until I walked out of the courtroom after arraignment to get the trial date. i thought that my motions were just denied.
Challenging it in open court preserves it on the record. You object on the grounds that you have not been informed of what's going on. (They assume Jurisdiction(JD) over you without proving it up.).
IF he overrules, take exception. If he does not note the exception, ask him to certify.I forget the rest, but it is called the 5 steps to objection in the downloads section.
This way you can have an already typed up notice of interlocutory appeal to serve on the bailiff regarding the already predicted outcome that he was going to enter a plea in for you(This really pisses them off, because you got "psychic" on them).
Remember one of the biggest weaknesses of bureaucrats is that they are soulless zoids who have been neuro-linguistically programmed by the public fool system and are very predictable.
In fact, they suck so bad, that they have to have a special, secret, star chamber elite judges college in Nevada to teach them to toy with you instead of really applying the law
Last edited by weishaupt1776 : 06-20-2005 at 06:03 PM.
|
06-20-2005, 08:08 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 591
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ice
The question of jurisdiction can be raised at any time, and since neither consent nor waiver can give jurisdiction, the court will not proceed where it appears from the record that it has no authority.
Coffee v. Peterbilt of Nashville, Inc. (Tenn.) 705 SW2d 656.
Ice
|
Thank you for bringing this up again, ICE.
I grow weary of reading about people who actually think you can DO something to GRANT jurisdiction. Jurisdiction (subject matter) CANNOT BE GRANTED, WAIVED nor can you be TRICKED into GIVING it!
You can, however, fail to object and challenge SMJ. Once challenged, it must then be PROVEN.
-BT
__________________
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." --Dresden James
|
06-20-2005, 10:26 PM
|
|
Sui Juris Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheBlackTruth
I grow weary of reading about people who actually think you can DO something to GRANT jurisdiction. Jurisdiction (subject matter) CANNOT BE GRANTED, WAIVED nor can you be TRICKED into GIVING it!
|
How about giving verbal testimony or argueing? Can't you be tricked into doing that?
It happens everyday !
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel
"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
|
06-21-2005, 02:48 AM
|
|
|
|
I'd like some critique on my earlier post.
Can you all weigh in on it?
Thanks
Henry Franklin
|
06-21-2005, 02:49 AM
|
|
The Outta Commissiona
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,417
|
|
|
in personam can be waived if not challenged at the onset, however SMJ can be challenged even after the case is over
|
06-21-2005, 04:23 AM
|
 |
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,866
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Akira
Ice,
As an afterthough, I'd like to mention, I'm a bit confused with the way you quoted me above.
The print in bold letters, are Test's questions taken one at a time... to help simply and clarify the explanation...
The way they appear in your post, would lead one to believe those are my words... which they are not...
My post, as written, was obviously unclear... so, I have edited it, and added:
Thanks for bringing this to my attention..
For HIS Glory,
Akira
|
Akira,
The format of the text from your post is what I was after... I'm sure that anyone reading the thread would understand the repeat of test's questions.
Ice |
06-21-2005, 04:34 AM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 591
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Akira
How about giving verbal testimony or argueing? Can't you be tricked into doing that?
It happens everyday !
|
Arguing or testifying may not be a wise strategy, but by itself means NOTHING.
The notion that doing such somehow grants some sort of imaginary jurisdiction is hogwash and has no foundation in law.
-BT
__________________
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." --Dresden James
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:00 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|
