Service Providers Discuss people and organizations that provide services such as eductaional material, document preparation, ect, and leave feedback for others seeking help.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > General Discussion > Service Providers
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #241  
Old 03-22-2006, 07:15 PM
Akira's Avatar
Akira Akira is offline
Sui Juris Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
Jerseee !

Bro ! happy to assist.. feel free to PM me also...

I anticipated you chiming in! Everytime I say: "If you can't defend your docs, they are worthless !!" I expect you there ! lol

Anyway... If you're the first to do this locally, I usually recommend a jury trial, which will take you to superior court... As a rule, the judges there, are a we bit smarter. It appears you are not the first, and besides, it's too late for that.

When a judge askes me to plea, sometimes I say "It's impossible to prove a negative.. I am innocent" lol It never gets me anywhere.. but as we both know, the law can't ask / expect the impossible"

A similar thing happens when they read the charges and ask if you undertand (stand under) them. I always say no. When asked why, I show the unrebutted aff. and say "the court has no standing... failure to prosecute", ect... and explain, "per the aff, I don't understand why I'm here, or the apparent attempt to go forward"... inevitably, they just roll on... and enter the plea for me... Most judges know what you're saying, they just want you and themselves out of there. They take enough crap without having to hear it in arraignment hearings too.. lol

If you want to avoid the arraignment hearing, make a point to get them to default before the hearing (per earlier post) They may still call you in.. because, as you know, some peeps can't defend their docs...

Quote:
What if some are not acquiescing and the clerks only know (or do) what they are taught....guilty or not guilty?
Not to worry.. you held your ground and that's what counts... it will all work out in the end.

The clerks know procedure. They rarely know the law and aren't competent to offer an opinion anyway.. I have seen clerks visibly shaking when my case was called.

I have had lawyers state outright, they don't understand the docs, how they work, ect. and have met me outside, and asked me to explain, and have even asked for copies of my opening dialog !

Make no mistake however, I still sh** pickles ever time I go to court... those folks are crazy..

Anyway... you seem to be in good shape..

Bring your 'DBA' form, if you have one.. if pressed, you can say "that's not me" or.. "whom are you asking? the corporate legal entity or the sovereign?" It's imperative to keep the two distinct and separate.

One thing I can't stress enough ! Grab the objection game called 'jurisdiction' and "the 5 steps to objecting" I know I posted "jurisdiction" in a thread if it's not in downloads, so you may need to search. The game helps alot ! and becomes very addicting after a while !

Don't let the judge get away with ANYTHING !! Silence is acquiescence !! For instance, when the judge said:
Quote:
"Ummm, okay. So you're pleading not guilty."
"Objection ! calls for a conclusion. I said no such thing ! I said I am innocent" If you don't agree with every word the judge says, object !

I just got an involved phone call.. and have lost my train of thought... heh

any questions?

For HIS Glory,
Akira

10:20pm P.S. Oh yeah ! don't forget to publish the default (register certified copies at the county seat). It's not essential for this hearing, but if published, can be used as evidence in later events. Build a certified / registered paper trail !

P.S.S. and here's the jurisdiction game.
Attached Files
File Type: zip jurisdiction.zip (690.6 KB, 14 views)
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel

"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight

Last edited by Akira : 03-22-2006 at 08:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 03-22-2006, 07:20 PM
Livefire's Avatar
Livefire Livefire is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,549
It's Payback Time!!!! :D :D :D

Jerseee ol' buddy ol' pal.....

You're a one in a million type of guy who helps out his fellow sovereigns whenever he can......myself included!

Time for me to return the favor. I noticed this little bit on page 6 of the 2006 Texas State Budget Report. (your info says yer living there) Those evil rat bastards are raising the amounts assessed to fines by $4.00 to pay for copper's and judge's raises!!! Can I get a little Tumey v Ohio here in da howse!!!! Here's a snapshot of that report and I've taken the liberty of including the URL. With the TS docs include a statement in your affidavit that you have in your possession and have read the report and state what it says....attach a copy to the affidavit. In your MtD, one of your motions will have the court take notice of Tumey v Ohio to DQ the judge.

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/hrofr...highlights.pdf

Employee compensation and judicial pay raises
As of September 1, 2006, the state will employ
approximately 219,555 full-time employees with payroll
expenses, including benefits, of $4.2 billion in fiscal
2006-07. The fiscal 2006-07 budget includes a pay raise
for all state employees at a cost of more than $585 million
during the biennium. Beginning September 1, 2005,
all employees received a 4 percent pay increase with a
minimum increase of $100 per month. They also will
receive a 3 percent increase with a monthly minimum of
$50, beginning September 1, 2006. In addition, longevity
and hazardous duty pay increased for state employees.
Under the new system, longevity pay is set at the rate of
$20 per month for each two years, rather than each three
years, of service and hazardous duty pay at the rate of $10
per month for each year of service.
Peace officers. SB 1 also included a targeted pay
raise for peace officers at the Department of Public Safety,
Department of Criminal Justice, Parks and Wildlife
Department, and the Alcoholic Beverage Commission.
The raise is in the form of a stipend for certain skill
or certification levels, including $50 per month for an
associate’s degree, $100 per month for a bachelor’s
degree, and $150 per month for a master’s degree. Other
certifications and bilingual capabilities also could make
officers eligible for an additional stipend.
Judicial pay. HB 11 by Hartnett, second called
session, increases judges’ salaries and bases them on the
salary of a district judge, instead of a Supreme Court
justice. District court judges’ minimum annual state
salaries increased from $101,700 to $125,000. Appellate
court justices, other than chief justices, have minimum
annual state salaries of 110 percent of district judges,
meaning that their minimum salaries rose from $107,350
to $137,500. Supreme Court justices have minimum
annual state salaries of 120 percent of district ju
dges, meaning that their minimum state salaries rose from
$113,000 to $150,000. District judges and courts of appeal
justices can receive county supplements up to the caps in
HB 11.
To pay for these increases, HB 11 raises fees in civil
and criminal cases. A person convicted of any offense,
other than a pedestrian or parking offense, pays an
additional $4 in court costs. Sixty cents of this fee goes to
the general fund of the municipality or county to promote
the efficient operation of municipal courts and the
investigation, prosecution, and enforcement of municipal
and state offenses. The other $3.40 is deposited in the
state judicial fund. The bill also adds a $37 civil case filing
fee in district courts, statutory county courts, and county
courts, to be deposited in the judicial fund.
Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 03-22-2006, 08:08 PM
Jerseee's Avatar
Jerseee Jerseee is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,837
Livefire and Akira...THANKS!!!!

Thanks for thinking of me in such a way!

But you should know that I do what I do to assist anyone in need. Whether it is referring them to a UCC site (which I don't agree with) or if its just to clear up a thought process---I'm there (as much as I can be).

I'm a little behind the power curve on posting and responding but, I'm working on something that (hopefully) will enlighten most on how to enrich themselves in this hypocritical system.

I'll do what I can to show folks what I have come to know and learn which works for me.

Once again thanks and I'll report back after this is over.
__________________
"FOR AS HE THINKETH IN HIS HEART, SO IS HE."
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 03-22-2006, 08:36 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Good to see you, jerseee.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 03-22-2006, 10:09 PM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,411
Jersee, Akira, Bobt, Livefire, rotweiler, et al...

This is education, and why I am here.
An excellent page.

Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 04-05-2006, 05:39 PM
Jerseee's Avatar
Jerseee Jerseee is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,837
Ticket Slayer Works!

Here is my Success Story about ticket Slayer.

I went through the court process to see what goes on. My commercial person received a ticket back in March. I had an opportunity to talk to the "peace" officer to get it torn up but I chose to take the ticket on behalf of my commercial person to see the proof for myself.

Upon the day of arraignment, the clerk asked me if I was pleading guilty or not guilty. I basically told her that I am innocent and to plea to your choices assumes a perponderance of guilt. She looked at me and said so your pleading not guilty and wrote it down. I told her that is not what I said and she moaned and groaned about her long line of people and high stack of paper work. I chose to have a trial by judge with a court reporter--no jury needed. So I pressed on. I did so because when the "peace" officer wrote the ticket--I signed it with "all rights reserved (ARR)" so I was not too concerned.

So after I was handed the court date, I immediately worked on the Ticket Slayer docs and began the filing process.

Each specified day that I was to file the necessary documents--I did. All the way up to the trial date. I calmly and casually walked in both the court clerk and prosecutors office and filed the docs as outlined.

Today was the trial day and the officer was there. I had my copies of the filed docs and I had questions perpared in case they wanted to ignore my default notices and writs.

Ticket Slayer starts you off with some very good questions to ask; however, I had questions that would continue where the docs left off. My questions were about jurisdiction and one important question that I was prepared to ask would be to the officer. I was going to ask the officer this: "Officer Friendly, what would of happened had I continued to travel and not pulled over when you were behind me with your flashing lights?" The usual answer is that I would have been arrested. Then I would ask, is that standard procedure for someone who refuses to stop if you are behind them with your lights flashing? This answer would more than likely be "yes" because they have to follow rules and it supports his first answer.

This question IMHO is key because there is only one answer---arrest. At that point I would have reverted back to my filed docs and reinforce those docs with a statement like this, "Ma'am, I did not grant jurisdiction and I still do not grant jurisdiction in this matter. Also, I knew if I did not stop traveling, I would have been arrested by the time I did stop. Therefore, I was under threat and duress to stop and appear as if I had granted jurisdiction. Officer Friendly just admitted that arrest is the proper procedure for a traveler unwilling to stop if an officer is behind them with flashing lights. Furthermore, I challenge the jurisdiction of this court and stand on my documents.

Anyway, I did not have a chance to ask my questions becasue the case was dismissed. In addition, I had my right to travel case law ready to quote if need be.

Do you studies!!! This stuff works!!

Any questions?
__________________
"FOR AS HE THINKETH IN HIS HEART, SO IS HE."
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 04-05-2006, 05:58 PM
Satori's Avatar
Satori Satori is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The California republic
Posts: 255
Jerseee that's awesome! I was just working on my TicketSlayer documents today; I have two tickets pending, and it's nice to hear another success story with the process.

One of "my" tickets involves an "infraction" (purported violation of a muni code in which there was no injured party). Apparently it's just sitting there in the system with no-one managing nor pressing it, with my affidavit timing out on it and not a prosetuter in sight. Apparently, they'd been waiting for me to come in whenever it was convenient up to a given date this month and they'd handle it on the spot. So I'm altering the Notice of Default to refer not only to a lack of response on the part of a prosecuting attorney, but any other agent of the court as well. My right to the use of writs and affidavits can't be abrogated by convolutions (dare I say convultions?) of their process, no?


- Satori
__________________
Actor qui contra regulam quid adduxit, non est audiendus.
("He ought not to be heard who advances a proposition contrary to the rules of law.")
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 04-05-2006, 06:19 PM
rentiap's Avatar
rentiap rentiap is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mostly liquid some solid sometimes gass
Posts: 628
Charges?

Jerseee:
What were the charges? And why were you stopped?
Cheers,
Craig.

Last edited by rentiap : 04-05-2006 at 06:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 04-05-2006, 06:49 PM
BOBT12's Avatar
BOBT12 BOBT12 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pennsylvania republic
Posts: 1,453
Great!

I am glad to hear of the success! Keep up the good work.
__________________
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."
-- Thomas Jefferson

It is dangerous to be right when your government is wrong. -Voltaire

All Rights Reserved.

www.restoretherepublic.net
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 04-05-2006, 06:54 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Good feedback, precisely,and congrats, jerseee.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Traffic Ticket hAKEEM Court 13 10-15-2007 01:25 AM
Traffic Court Losses weishaupt1776 Travel 56 07-18-2006 10:29 AM
Traffic Ticket PANICPASS Travel 16 05-13-2005 01:46 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer