Richard Cornforth Seminar

[KITCHIE]

Hey there all!!

Well this past weekend I went to the Richard Cornforth Seminar Hosted by Jason Whitney of the Law Research Group. All I can say is OH MY GOD!!!

This was the most exhilarating, informative and eye opening presentation I have ever attended.

Materials like Credit Card Debt Collectors cinference and pleadings that are just amazing. RICO suits where when you file one you become the Private Attorney General! A petition and a Bill in Washington to prohibit "not for publication" appeals rulings - which is about ready to come out-. Tax stuff...

Eye opening fact; The judiciary has a HUGE problem because everyone who has been convicted of willful failure to file etc has been convicted of 26 USC 7201. Well a judge brought it to the attention of the Senate Committee on judicary the these people have in fact been convicted of a PENALTY!!! The actual crime of willful failure to file is not in the charge only yhe penalty is. So naturally people are getting convictions vacated because how can you be convicted of a penalty??

If you ever have a chance to go to A Richard Cornforth Seminar...GO!!!!!!

Thank you Jason for a very educational and enlightening weekend.

I will be joining the Law Research Group.

Kitchie

[SKYGZR]

I was toying with the idea of attending, yet couldn't get the time away. Perhaps when you have more time, share more insights and perhaps some downloadable materials. Hopefuly LRG will make available a DVD / Materials.

[J.W.]

There will be a DVD and a workbook from this weekends lecture available within the next week.

I don't want to go into a long rant about how awesome the DVD will be etc. becasue for I try to keep my SJ propaganda to a minimum since the intent of this site is non-commercial.

I do want to thank SJ for making these forums available however and further allowing me to post a notification on the boards about my workshops.

Thanks again,

Jason

[Bill Smith]

Cornforth is entertaining, but his stuff doesn't work. Total waste of money.

[J.W.]

Bill,

It is too bad that you feel that way and I am certain that you have grounds for your statement however, I have had success with Cornforth's material. No one's stuff works all of the time. I know a great deal of people across the country that are legal researchers that apply their technology so to speak, and sometimes it works and sometimes it does not.

I am curious to know that your experince was though. Please do share if it is not to personal.

Thanks,

Jason

[Campy]

Bill,

Do you have a story to tell? I would like to hear both sides. Also Bill, I took a look at "all of your posts" and with the exception of your funny fight with lawyerdude, your posts only say .......Dont do this...Dont do that...its a scam.....this ME and DE process doesnt work.

I am not saying you dont have any experiance in the matter, but I like to ask questions. Do you have history you can share with us to help us avoid making mistakes in the future?

I guess what I am saying is, I am getting tired of posts from so many people on this site who constantly use the "bubba said" theories. Bubba said I should do this, and it worked for Bubba because Bubba said that.

I just like proof.

Please dont take offense to this reply, I am just getting down to brass tacts.

Thanks,

CC

Very well said, Campy!

Bill, you sound deppressed. Don't take offense; but you are so pessimistic...it's pathetic!

If you won't use any drugs because you don't want to add to the unjust emrichment of the pharmacautical companies, you might want to try something else to improve your mood: a walk in the beach, a long conversation with a friend or a loved one, a new pair or shoes (leather is soft!), a fantastic weekend with your partner, or alone, all to yourself, a hot tub...I dont know...whatever you can do, PRONTO, to make you feel better.

Smile.

[PANICPASS]

Jason W. wrote :
"I have had success with Cornforth's material."


Can you elaborate? What did material of Cornforths did you have success with?


I hope that your answer will not be silence (because silence equates to fraud ).

[KITCHIE]

1 out of 8 debt validation letters I sent to a debt collection thug worked the first time. The one that tried to pass off a DB printout at the ledger received a very nasty letter regarding misrepresentation never appeared again. These letters were for 5 different people. One person who I had helped previously was the one that needed a second letter.

I have also used some of his writings in my motions to the court and I believe faired very well... caused the court to behave in the proper manner.

Kitchie

[J.W.]

PANICPASS,

One of the key things I have learned from Cornforth are strategies so to speak. Challenging subject matter jurisdiction and the like. To be more accurate in regards to my statement above -- I have used a great deal of the "spirit" of Cornforth's technology, theories, concepts and the like. Cornforth does not really have any sort of "boiler plate" process that I am aware of, his materials are more-so guides and examples and non-linier in my opinion. What I enjoy doing is studying the concepts from all angles and putting my own personal understanding behind it. I can state that I have used void judgment petitons before with some sucess but not 100 percent thus far. The first time I used it I did make a few errors but later resolved the issue.

For lawsuits dealing with debt matters in particular credit card debt I use a strategy in part derived from Cornforth and a gal by the name of Sharron Martin. They offered key inspiration at best however I designed the pleading and thus far it has yeilded consistant success, but to say it is a magic bullet -- hardly.

The answer pleading that I have been using is:
RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT with AFFIRMITIVE DEFENSES AS PRESENTED by AFFIDAVIT OF Willy Wonka,
CONCURRENT NOTICE OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT and MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE (F.R.C.P. 12(b)6)

Cornforth in some instances uses notice of removal however I got the idea mailing from Sharon Martin. Any time someone is sued in state court it is the wrong jurisdiction. Why?, you may ask; the grounds are simple and I'll pull them from the document.

JURISDICTIONAL CHALLEGE
35. Affiant herby and herewith challenges subject matter jurisdiction with respect to this instant case for this matter involves a number of “federal questions” namely:
• Interstate Commerce
• Title 15 U.S.C. “Truth in Lending Act”
• Title 15 U.S.C. “Fair Debt Collection Practices Act”
• Title 15 U.S.C. “Fair Credit Reporting Act”
• Title 12 U.S.C “Banks and Banking”
• Title 5 U.S.C Administrative Procedures Act

36. Plaintiff is a purported “lending institution”. Lending (Banking) institutions that operate within the United States, Federal Enclaves as well as Federal Territories are regulated and subject to Federal Jurisdiction.

If anyone would like to verify whether or not this strategy has worked or not please see the post on our message board from Mary C. who had her cased dismissed 5 days after she filed her Notice of Removal Answer. In fact, I think I copy/pasted it into the success stories here on SJ.

In any event, I don't know anyone who's stuff works "all the time", period. If anyone knows the guy who has the that sort of stuff -- let me know, sign me up or whatever.

Jason