Chase redeems their coupon!

[Lawdog]

And you're a Nazi POS, and everyone knows it.

[robhalford88]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

And you're a Nazi POS, and everyone knows it.

Everyone? You took a referendum, did you?
Poor widdle lawnugget, people gone done called him bad names and hurt his feelings.
Now, if you were a MAN and not a lawyer, your feelings MIGHT count, but with all the crap you pull here and undoubtedly in court, I could't give a flying fat rats clacker.
Suck that, nugget.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

And you're a Nazi...

Originally Posted by Lawdog

loser tactic

Ah...the typical tactic of the fool who is losing an argument badly.

Instead of responding rationally to the points being made by the other side, the loser blurts,

"Oh, yeah?

...you're a Nazi!"

Pathetic, boys.

Really pathetic.

Would you care to see a truly "pathetic" compilation of your own prolific use of a despicable rhetorical artifice that is, indeed, "the typical tactic of the fool who is losing an argument badly?"

Indeed, it does!

Originally Posted by Lawdog

...you're a Nazi...

Hmmmm......

Originally Posted by Lawdog

Ah...the typical tactic of the fool who is losing an argument badly.

Instead of responding rationally to the points being made by the other side, the loser blurts,

"Oh, yeah?

...you're a Nazi!"

Pathetic, boys.

Really pathetic.

Yes, "it is pathetic,"

"really pathetic," boy.

In your own words too, son.

Originally Posted by Lawdog

...you're a Nazi...

hypocrite

Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English ypocrite, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin hypocrita, from Greek hypokritēs actor, hypocrite, from hypokrinesthai
Date:
13th century

1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion

2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

Merriam Webster Online Dictionary

[Godssun]

I don't know about any of that stuff. Lawdog has been correct on almost every point in this thread including the Nazi comment.

[robhalford88]

Originally Posted by Godssun

I don't know about any of that stuff. Lawdog has been correct on almost every point in this thread including the Nazi comment.

Is that 'knowledge' you have from first hand experience, or is it hearsay?
I would think you wouldn't know a 'nazi' if you saw one.
I would bet you may have already.
Hows CA these days Codee?

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Godssun

Lawdog has been correct on almost every point in this thread including the Nazi comment.

You have made your claim.

Prove it.

Point by point, in order presented.

Yes?

No?


Prove your claim?

[Lucky225]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

This has some interesting recent history. I posted this success story on Quatloos yesterday and Demosthenes opened a thread, what she perceives to be a jab.

http://www.quatloos.com/Tax-Forums/v...cd 1e924e6836

I suspected by the timing that the material in the redemption letter upset her and prompted her to start the Quatloser thread. So I mentioned it and since people are directed to process then I included it. Now she is deleting all posts by me. So I think it is time to elevate this success story to a new level!

The coupon Chase redeemed was for a little over $13,000 and they tagged on charges and such for over $300 but then took them off within the same Statement. There was a late fee for about $40 and a finance charge of about $5. So you see the Statement is saying minimum payment on the $45 is $10.



Enjoy,

David Merrill.

Sorry, I'm just "Waking up" to this forum. The attached document in the original post starts with

Originally Posted by Coupon offer.doc

Notice of the Potentiality of crime's being committed


The fact that you are presenting a coupon tells me, even though it is not specifically mentioned, that this is designed to be a payment of interest against the bond(s) your people have purchased. I am aware the line of credit that the government or Federal Reserve System issued to create this bond is secured by myself, myself being one of the lenders. The bonded pledge series number is ______SSN_____ All along it has been my assets that have been pledged for this bond, and I can find no place where I am to be charged interest on my own money, Creating double enrichment on your company's part. Unless you can provide proof that these U.C.C. STATUTES do not pertain to our agreement, your company's use of my collateral and your failure to process this coupon payment should make your company guilty of the following crime:

I'm a little confused about this, I have a Credit Card account with Wells Fargo to which I am the primary account holder, and there is no SSN for me on the account. I added my wife as a joint, secondary, account holder. If I were to use this template to redeem a Wells Fargo Coupon, I'm wondering what I should put as the bonded pledge series number as I do not have an SSN, and my wife, a joint account holder who was added at a later date does. Should I have my wife send this letter or re-word it for both of us and put my bond series number as unknown?

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Lucky225

I'm a little confused about this, I have a Credit Card account with Wells Fargo to which I am the primary account holder, and there is no SSN for me on the account. I added my wife as a joint, secondary, account holder. If I were to use this template to redeem a Wells Fargo Coupon, I'm wondering what I should put as the bonded pledge series number as I do not have an SSN, and my wife, a joint account holder who was added at a later date does. Should I have my wife send this letter or re-word it for both of us and put my bond series number as unknown?

I doubt that is relevant. I have not done this myself but have listened as others have gotten their Setoff. The point is that you notify them about double-enrichment and await them to cover their ass (CYA) with the Setoff.

I don't know about any of that stuff. Lawdog has been correct on almost every point in this thread including the Nazi comment.

Maybe so. I put Lawdog on my Ignore List because he bores me.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Godssun]

Originally Posted by mrg

In your own words too, son.

The difference being that RobHalford88 really believes in the stronger views carried by the Nazis and makes personal heroes out of satanic gays.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Godssun

The difference being that RobHalford88 really believes in the stronger views carried by the Nazis and makes personal heroes out of satanic gays.

That's another claim.

Prove up.