Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Demosthenes
You're welcome to post your incoherent nonsense on Ranting & Raving, but any post that is not relevant to tracking you as a promoter will be deleted from the Tracking Promoters forum.
I'm surprised your obsession with Quatloos and your repeated attempts to bring the conversation here sits well the the Sui moderators.
|
Quatloos is a real treasure-trove. When I read there was a team of attorneys there to analyze and help with scams and shams I was elated. And sure enough, you guys have delivered the wonderful psychological profile of protectionism, denial and dissociation with reality.
In its simplest form, the Federal Reserve Act setting up the central bank of the US in 1913 was to furnish a flexible money supply. That is from the first sentence of the Act. What was the purpose of something so dishonest as flexible money?
Bankers began as jewelers typically. These were the families in the community who had a strongbox and security. So people would keep their valuable savings - jewels and coins with the local jewelers. This had its drawbacks when Sam bought something large from Tom Sam had to wait for the jeweler to give him the coins and Tom was likely to come by and ask the jeweler to hold those same coins in safekeeping anyway, so people began exchanging receipts for the coins and then the jeweler started giving out individual receipts for each coin and now we have notes.
Soon the jewelers started writing more receipts than coins in the vault. This was flexible money and that was criminal - still is. By the time of J.P. Morgan and the War Between the States (extraordinary occasion) this illegal stellionation was somewhat acceptable and when there was a run on the bank, the banks
failed,* and only the very first people to trade in the notes got their gold.
The coupon directly exposes double-enrichment by dealing twice with credit in the credit card industry. Thanks for that example of a coupon. "...this coupon..." is accurate. They want to redeem the coupon and collect payment too.
Demosthenes; Thank you for all you have done over the years to expose the terrible testimony you and many Quatlosers wallow in. There are hundreds of Readers there for only a few people like you and that is something to thank God about.
Right here within this thread it is quite obvious to anybody smart enough to be reading here at Suijuris that I was not a Promoter until you had some kind of clue that people actually desire my knowledge and intellectual property enough to pay me. Now I am in a new classification in your eyes. I have been promoting Libel of Review in admiralty and its lessons in effective Refusal for Cause for about as long as I have been utilizing the "exclusive original cognizance" you kindly linked of the US through the district court.
Thank you for the compendium of district court docket. You have no idea what capital integration is. There would be hundreds of complaints against me if the suitors were expecting any justice from that taxpayer erroneously called Article III judge. The 'saving to suitors' clause specifies
only where common law is competent to give remedy. These suits are filed expecting dismissal.
That is the transfer of the competence. But you and Shoonra and Judge Roy Bean either don't get that or you are involved in protectionism of the foul testimony I just described.
Upon even an Internet Yarn admission of involvement with FRNs you jumped on a chance to stab me in the back. Well, there you have it - nobody pays me in FRNs. I only accept United States Notes Demosthenes. I only accept
redeemed FRNs.
http://www.deathandtaxes.com/bio.htm
http://www.senate.gov/~finance/heari...2204jmtest.pdf
http://alina_stefanescu.typepad.com/..._of_helpf.html
Regards,
David Merrill.
* Actually this failure left the bankers with everything in the bank after the run was declared. They would not empty the vaults to customers.
New York; It's Upper Ten and Lower Million by George Lippard is an excellent first romantic/heroic treatise about justice against the bankers.
