Wyoming Sheriffs!

[Codee]

Originally Posted by palani

So there must be some substance to this story if these losers jump all over it.

Your such an idiot. I will spell it out for you since i know how you hate to actually do research.

First we have already decided that there was "something" to the story. From more credible websites then the one linked to above it is already apparent that

1) "The court decision came about after Mattis &
other members of the Wyoming Sheriffs' Association brought a suit "

Is a lie. There was NO COURT DECISION! The issue was settled.

2) "The District Court ruled in
favor of the sheriffs, stating that,
'Wyoming is a sovereign state and
the duly elected sheriff of a county is the highest law enforcement
official within a county and has law enforcement powers exceeding that of any other state or federal official.'

Is a lie as the disstrict court never ruled on the case.

3) "If a sheriff doesn't want the Feds in his county he has the
constitutional power and right to keep them out or ask them to leave or
retain them in custody."

Is only a quote from the Sheriff of the county who is not a judicial officer nor is he an expert at law ex officio his office as sheriff

4) That the whole thing was over whether the protection of a wolf could be enforced under interstate commerce clause of the US constitution.

[palani]

Originally Posted by Codee

Your such an idiot. I will spell it out for you since i know how you hate to actually do research.
....

Now, Cody/Codee, kindly take note that I never called you a loser; however, since you appear to have volunteered for the office we might consider it filled.

[Codee]

Originally Posted by palani

Now, Cody/Codee, kindly take note that I never called you a loser; however, since you appear to have volunteered for the office we might consider it filled.

I never said that yo did call me a loser. I did however call you an idiot because you are one.

Now go whine to Jason Whitney you fool and see if crying helps.

[Truth-Bringer]

Originally Posted by Codee

Is a lie. There was NO COURT DECISION! The issue was settled.

Apparently though, it was settled in the Sheriff's favor, if everything your source presented was accurate... But there is no real federal jurisdiction within any of the states. That has been settled before:

As the Supreme Court once said, "The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.":

A thorough explanation is here:

http://www.originalintent.org/edu/federaljur.php

http://www.worldnewsstand.net/today/articles/3US.htm

And a few good points here:

http://www.constitution.org/juris/fedjur1.htm

The courts exercise their "power" due to deceptions created in the legal codes - which happened because there's no law prohibiting Congress from making deceptive laws - and due to the ignorance of the general population, but the fact of the matter is that the Feds have no jurisdiction in the 50 states other than in specific federal enclaves. The "trickery" is via the Buck Act and the creation of "shadow" states - State of Alaska, State of Florida, etc. when shifting definitions as in the end of the link above - instead of the actual area - Alaska state, Florida state. It's all legal trickery.