Lien an IRS agent today!

[David Merrill]

This suitor wanted me to publish this far and wide unaltered for enforceability and so that other victims of IRS agents can better understand this common law recourse.

So if you want; call our clerk at (719) 520-6200 and order up a certified copy today. I suggest you frame it.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Shoonra]

Try this and you can attain something that even DiM hasn't yet -- a federal prison record!

On Jan 7, 2008 the President signed into law Public Law 110-177, the Court Security Improvement Act of 2007, 121 Stat.L. 2534.

Sec. 201, captioned Protections against malicious recording of fictitious liens against federal judges and federal law enforcement officers, added a new section to the Criminal Code, 18 USC sec 1521 {at 121 Stat.L. 2536}:

Whoever files, attempts to file, or conspires to file, in any public record or in any private record which is generally available to the public, any false lien or encumbrance against the real or personal property of an individual described in section 1114 {*}, on account of the performance of official duties by that individual, knowing or having reason to know that such lien or encumbrance is false or contains any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.

{*} ___Although the caption for this section speaks of law enforcement officers, "an individual described in section 1114" includes:

... any officer or employee of the United States or of any agency in any branch of the United States Government ... or any person assisting such an officer or employee in the performance of such duties or on account of that assistance...

So the protection against bogus liens is not really confined to law enforcement but includes non-law enforcement federal personnel such as IRS employees.

I might add that several states have also enacted laws against bogus liens against federal, state, or municipal govt employees, making it more difficult to file such liens, easier for such liens to be annulled and expunged, and providing criminal penalties for filing groundless liens.

DiM hasn't been locked in a federal slammer ....yet, but I am sure he can give you advice about forming meaningful relationships behind bars.

[trooper2ls]

What was the purpose in liening the agent in the first place?

..J

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

DiM hasn't been locked in a federal slammer ....yet, but I am sure he can give you advice about forming meaningful relationships behind bars.

Lovely homophobic imagery again! What I enjoy about it is this Zionist ADL mentality that one should keep people in fear of jail and prison by this kind of disgusting intimidation. A rumor that you will be forced into homosexual activity for being imprisoned. Bringing this out in Shoonra proves I have struck a nerve with him.

...any false lien or encumbrance against...

The reader should not that the lien has to be false and also note that the Secretary of the Treasury is not a government employee. Therefore no IRS agent under the Secretary is a government employee, but that is only if you understand that as fact.

If you do not know how to bring facts on the record properly then you might have some troubles with governmental immunity. The Secretary of the Treasury is IMF - an organ of the UN. The Fed is a central bank - international in character.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[moishanb]

Does this new Court Security Act now protect government employees from fraudulent liens filed by banks? Is it retroactive?

Maybe this was a true service to those government employees. Maybe Mr. Bush is protecting the government employees from the trillions$$$ of fraudulent liens filed by banks, and this will now create the biggest banking collapse in history(I think you know the answers)

There must be an escape clause somewhere, a backdoor if you will, for the banks, otherwise, they are screwed.

[farmer_giles_of_ham]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Lovely homophobic imagery again! What I enjoy about it is this Zionist ADL mentality that one should keep people in fear of jail and prison by this kind of disgusting intimidation. A rumor that you will be forced into homosexual activity for being imprisoned. Bringing this out in Shoonra proves I have struck a nerve with him.

Abu Ghraib. Its a kind of projection since there are so many "establishment" homos. Welcome to the ancient pagan world again...

Well I was held for 72 days, in 3 different jails in 2 separate counties, which I think beats your record brother David. And I was held without charge, bail, denial of bail, court order, arraingment, seeing a judge, counsel, nada, zilch, zero, nothing- just limbo. No one was looking for me or cared, no process pending. I finally found the right person to bribe and he let me out for half the customary $1000, a mere $500. Not bad eh?

And it was chill, cool, decent people, mostly Black and PR, a couple of actually openly gay men, but otherwise zero problems. The guards were far worse, but it was ok I came out in one piece.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by trooper2ls

What was the purpose in liening the agent in the first place?

..J

Compensation.

I want to take a moment to clarify that I advised against this lien. The same suitor has a much better lien and this one is weaker as Shoonra points out. The strategy against him will be to jail him on the weaker IRS agent lien in order to release both. But he is pressed by his anger with the IRS so he went ahead anyway.

The stronger lien is an attorney who forecloses on about a hundred homes a day - all from a vacant office. There is absolutely no governmental immunity for Robert Erler. However, they might use the myth that the IRS agent is governmental to coerce the suitor into releasing both liens.

Thanks Farmer and Moishanb;

Those comments are heartening. I think it says a lot about Shoonra, the use of fear tactics like that. There is absolutely nothing noble about feeding off peoples' fears like that. This nation, founded on Revolution, would never have gotten anywhere if people just traded liberty for safety.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[trooper2ls]

So basically the suitor ran up against a hardball at the IRS who thought they were a God and above the rules and this was his way of pulling him back into the pit... ballsy move. I hope it works out for him.. it is a chess game with those guys.

IRS Employees are interesting folks. I have become aquainted with 2, retired IRS corporate auditors about 2 years ago. I was doing some electrical work for a friend's neighbor and her father in-law and mother in-law were visiting. We hit it off because I collect Jaguars and the father in-law was the president of a local chapter of the Jaguar owner's club. It wasn't till months later that I asked what he "used to do" as he was retired when I met him. When he told me I about fell out of my chair. Needless to say I have been able to gleen some valuable insider nuggets of information from these people. He told me that he was so glad to be retired because he really disliked the position he was in but it provided security and income for his family so he stuck it out till it paid out.

The good thing was is that he was able to confirm some of the information that I already had. And as I had always suspected.. if you conduct your affairs the right way from the beginning.. then you will never have any problem with the IRS.

Nice thing about common law pure trusts in Switzerland ;) Grandpa was so very wise.


..L

[David Merrill]

Indeed the suitor has some items on record that will make it very hard to press a prosecution on the lien I have shown. He is not foolish to be confident.

That is the great thing about being a suitor - a court of competent jurisdiction forms the record prior to court. That way there is no need for court. He already has record that the IRS agent is not covered by any immunity even if the Secretary, his principal, was a federal employee.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[David Merrill]

I am growing impatient as I was hoping Shoonra would give me something to write this explanation upon.

What would compose a bogus lien - against an IRS agent? One that would allow recourse like Shoonra is talking about?

That deserves careful examination. In this case it is a bogus Notice of Federal Tax Lien that has caused the suitor grief and caused him to find this IRS agents home properties and place a lien on everything he owns... So what determines or would possibly determine the lien the suitor has placed on the IRS agent is a "false lien"?

That is the most important question now, isn't it?

A child can see the simplicity if one can comprehend the remedy provided in the Federal Reserve Act itself. (attached) And that remedy is still in full force and effect today understanding that US notes are lawful money and FRNs are redeemable in lawful money today, as US notes still in circulation - in the form of FRNs since 1971.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...1----000-.html

Just that US notes are not redeemable in gold since 1933.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...000-notes.html

Now one has remedy. Redeem lawful money. Do not accept (endorse) private credit from the Fed. If you do you are requesting and accepting the elastic currency of the Fed (see the Title of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act attached).

If you are carrying FRNs instead of US notes in the form of FRNs and you buy something, the Treasury holds a First Lien against whatever you purchased with their credit should you come into a dispute about filing a Return of Income, a voluntary contract you have already agreed to. This is why people (in Oregon a whole group is actively trying to influence the county clerk and recorder there) get so confused about the Federal Tax Lien being in the form of a Notice. They bitch and moan that the NOFTL is not a Lien - It is only a Notice!!

The lien was always there - inherent in the private credit a taxpayer's property, house or whatever was purchased with on the presumption that the paychecks were never redeemed in lawful money - only endorsed over to the Fed for private credit!

This is why Shoonra will never and has never answered my simple Question:

When did Congress ever decide to take US notes out of circulation?

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ll_juliard.jpg

The Treasury decided that FRNs will function as US notes in 1971 and that is why UNITED STATES NOTES at the top of the currency is rare. But non-endorsed paychecks are paid in US notes that look just like FRNs.

The reason that the suitor's lien is valid is that he has been redeeming lawful money. The reason his lien is valid is that the IRS lien - evidenced in the NOFTL against him for the rediculous amount of $1.5M is the bogus lien.


Right Shoonra?



Regards,

David Merrill.