CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL Retreats!!!

[ezrhythm]

Taken from;
http://www.thinkfreeforums.org/viewtopic.php?f=71&t=819

there is a California highway patrol on freeway overpass watching for people running the red light on the on ramp... I am traveling up the ramp and i see there is no cross traffic so there is no danger in not stopping (there cant be cross traffic) when i get to where the CHP is he waves for me to pull over, so i wave back and keep going down the freeway, he jumps on his motor cycle and follows me lights and all, so just to be nice i pull over to see whats wrong, he walks up to the right side of my private property and says: "I NEED TO SEE YOUR DRIVERS LICENSE AND REGISTRATION". i SAY: "i DON'T HAVE A DRIVERS LICENSE, i WAS NOT DRIVING" (I AM IN A SUBURBAN ALONE). he looks around inside the truck and says: "WELL IF YOUR NOT DRIVING WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING? I responded with an answer I learned from a guy named RICHARD MACDONALD in California, I said: I AM TRAVELING AND THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE CALIFORNIA REPUBLIC GUARANTEES THAT I HAVE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL FROM POINT "A" TO POINT "B" WITHOUT FEE OR RESTRICTION AND NOW THAT YOU HAVE BEEN "ADVISED" OF THAT FACT YOU ARE TRESPASSING ON MY RIGHT TO TRAVEL, AND I CAN SUE YOU PERSONALLY, NOT THE DEPARTMENT, BUT YOU, UNDER CIVIL CODE SECTION 1708 ABSTINENCE FROM INJURY, WHICH STATES EVEN IN THE PERFORMANCE OF A LAWFUL ACT IF YOU ARE CAUSING INJURY YOU MUST ABSTAIN. THE INJURY YOU ARE CAUSING IS A TRESPASS ON MY RIGHT TO TRAVEL, SO YOU MUST ABSTAIN". he looks at me for about 5 seconds and then he says: wait for it... "****" and then walks back to his motor cycle (I think hes going for his Tazer gun or something) and then he gets on the motorcycle and rides away, that was the first time I ever tried any thing like that, I sat there for a minute thinking this is some kind of trick, and just watched him ride of into the sunset never to be seen by me again.

the moral of the story: YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL...IT WORKS and if handled the right way, they do not want anything to do with you.

WHY SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT HONOR YOUR RIGHTS, WHEN YOU ALWAYS SETTLE FOR PRIVILEGES.

peace to everyone.
this is not legal advise, it is a factual Right, use info at your own risk. (know what your doing first).

[Tigron-X]

Bravo! Seems like they're willing to pick and choose their battles.

[Dillon Hunt]

yeah,

Once informed of the statute, he can't say he was just doing his job. He thought twice, when he realized he could be sued in his private capacity.

thanks

[gldskr]

It appears the CHP was a newbie drone. There's no mention whether the vehicle was registered. Perhaps if it was the outcome may have been different. Luck is still a valuable commodity though.

gldskr

[ezrhythm]

I don't believe CHP's can ride motorcycles as newbs.

[RevokeTheTrust]

Salutations to the holders of this fine material.

Health has kept me from these forums for quite some time. Just wanted to point out that employees from that CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL are looking to renegotiate the unwritten matters of your movements. I said a lot more to the ones that diverted my property 15 days ago, with a sprig of lemon and peppermint, and he just keeps defaulting with a bluff here and there to lay aside your statements and reservations. They pick and choose whomever the feel. They'll violate every rule of safe movement themselves just to tailgate behind someone to have the scanner automatically read the license plates of the vehicle attached to the Vessel; then they whip around with such non-signalled and non-predictable movement just to get behind the next mobile to cast their illusion of safety upon.

As a matter of enforcement, they are true to their word in a matter of the common Law, yet they are there to (en)force the attachment and re-assignment of title to property to the limited liability of their legislated person in their Form. The attachment is as though it were voluntarily applied, and the search would reveal that the prosecution depends on that inquest. All it waters down to is to fill the office yourself and do the job right. I'll even post the Law Enforcement Code of Ethics supposedly taught to those CITY OF ANAHEIM and CITY OF LOS ANGELES employees back in 1969, that I uncovered in a book I recovered a couple months ago;

Law Enforcement Code of Ethics

As a Law Enforcment Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property, to protect the innocent against decption, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality, and justice.

I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all, maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn, or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. Honest in thought and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the laws of the land and the regulations of my department. Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature that is confided to me in my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in the performance of my duty.

I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, animosities or friendships to influence my decisions. With no compromise for crime and with relentless prosecution of criminals, I will enforce the law courteously and appropriatly without fear or favor, malice or ill will, never employing necessary force or violence and never accepting gratuties.

I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service. I will constantly strive to achieve these objectives and ideals, dedicating myself before God to my chosen profession...law enforcement.

This is the material of children, not for adults and their hellspawn adulterers that are given "human rights" just because they want to live ignorant and given a gravestone that they died smart.

without prejudice,
m. Gregory Thomas(tm)

[acicalla]

Was the vehicle tagged and registered?

Originally Posted by ezrhythm

Taken from;
http://www.thinkfreeforums.org/viewtopic.php?f=71&t=819

there is a California highway patrol on freeway overpass watching for people running the red light on the on ramp... I am traveling up the ramp and i see there is no cross traffic so there is no danger in not stopping (there cant be cross traffic) when i get to where the CHP is he waves for me to pull over, so i wave back and keep going down the freeway, he jumps on his motor cycle and follows me lights and all, so just to be nice i pull over to see whats wrong, he walks up to the right side of my private property and says: "I NEED TO SEE YOUR DRIVERS LICENSE AND REGISTRATION". i SAY: "i DON'T HAVE A DRIVERS LICENSE, i WAS NOT DRIVING" (I AM IN A SUBURBAN ALONE). he looks around inside the truck and says: "WELL IF YOUR NOT DRIVING WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING? I responded with an answer I learned from a guy named RICHARD MACDONALD in California, I said: I AM TRAVELING AND THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE CALIFORNIA REPUBLIC GUARANTEES THAT I HAVE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL FROM POINT "A" TO POINT "B" WITHOUT FEE OR RESTRICTION AND NOW THAT YOU HAVE BEEN "ADVISED" OF THAT FACT YOU ARE TRESPASSING ON MY RIGHT TO TRAVEL, AND I CAN SUE YOU PERSONALLY, NOT THE DEPARTMENT, BUT YOU, UNDER CIVIL CODE SECTION 1708 ABSTINENCE FROM INJURY, WHICH STATES EVEN IN THE PERFORMANCE OF A LAWFUL ACT IF YOU ARE CAUSING INJURY YOU MUST ABSTAIN. THE INJURY YOU ARE CAUSING IS A TRESPASS ON MY RIGHT TO TRAVEL, SO YOU MUST ABSTAIN". he looks at me for about 5 seconds and then he says: wait for it... "****" and then walks back to his motor cycle (I think hes going for his Tazer gun or something) and then he gets on the motorcycle and rides away, that was the first time I ever tried any thing like that, I sat there for a minute thinking this is some kind of trick, and just watched him ride of into the sunset never to be seen by me again.

the moral of the story: YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL...IT WORKS and if handled the right way, they do not want anything to do with you.

WHY SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT HONOR YOUR RIGHTS, WHEN YOU ALWAYS SETTLE FOR PRIVILEGES.

peace to everyone.
this is not legal advise, it is a factual Right, use info at your own risk. (know what your doing first).

[Soldier of Truth]

Originally Posted by Little Brother 192

This man is NOT a dumb-ass.

On my website my first thread and post was a link to his website.

Good for you EZ. You used the correct method, researched law, and it worked.

I thought however that Richards work was predicated on not being a US citizen and being a state citizen. I have read his article where he talks about "driving" Vs. "Traveling" however he included virtually nothing about that point as far as citations went. Do you have anything more you could share on "driving" Vs. "traveling" that you obtained from Richard?

Thanks,

Cody

He's "NOT a dumb-ass." Well on THAT one thing we can agree Cody. So if he's not a dumb ass, and has "CITATIONS and good, honest, research," then I guess that says a lot less about you.

Richard McDonald holds the same theory as I have concerning "natural persons." It is a reason that I hold the position that I do regarding Natural Persons. I don't buy into strawman procedures, I don't utilize strawman theories. In fact, Richard "brags" about me and how my research and litigation skills have developed since I've been mentored by him.

Kind of hushes the loud talking you do.

Keep up the good work EZ. But, make sure you make yourself knowledgeable to court procedure as well for the times when you run into officers that get an attitude because you know what they should and cite you for it. Sometimes its not the "substantive" law that they beat us up on, but the "procedural law."

Kudos again.

[Soldier of Truth]

Originally Posted by freebeme

Man you are stupid.

First point: Richard McDonald has good research, not good conclusions. I am glad you are praised by him for your litigation. Please do share record documents of your litigation.

Second: ALL-UPPER-CASE name arguments = Strawman argument.

Third: EZ was not even the person involved in the incident.

Fourth: Sandman, TMR, Ready to Fight, Myself, and somew new guy on this forum have all won with my motions and post them here, with their full name and what county the sh!t was going down in. You are stupid as all hell and could not find your was out of your a$$ if there a was rose scented beacon.

Fifth: MacDonald research is nothing compared to Thomas Thornhill the Third's research.


Post up you loser. Post some citations and post some of you LITIGANT docs.

It's not "solely" a strawman argument. It's a "proper use of English" argument.

Next so WHAT, of your opinions to the comparisons of "who's better." The response was to you comment, not a comparison. I've learned things from him as well. I started my Motor Vehicle research of his research, and continued on my own.

You make me laugh. You get so "worked" up, trying to show how much you know. You make yourself look like an idiot. Unfortunately anyone going over your posts and seeing how you interact with people, you may do them more harm than good.

It's cool though....I know you just talk and insult because you're lonely and seek attention, so you have to denigrate so you can keep responding back and forth. It'll be okay Cody. There's light at the end of the tunnel for you.

[Soldier of Truth]

Originally Posted by freebeme

Man you are stupid.

Fourth: Sandman, TMR, Ready to Fight, Myself, and somew new guy on this forum have all won with my motions and post them here, with their full name and what county the sh!t was going down in. You are stupid as all hell and could not find your was out of your a$$ if there a was rose scented beacon.

What's your point? My statements were to expose how inconsistent "YOU" make "YOURSELF" sound. One minute you're praising someone, then because you find that their views are inconsistent with yours then you start bashing them.

I am extremely and sincerely happy that you and all whom you have named have been successful in dealing with some of the problems that are common to us all, as well as you being able to assist others in need. This is what this forum is supposed to be about. Unfortunately it is apparent that you can't see the forest but for the trees.

I could toss my flawless record around and beat on my chest about who I've helped, and blah, blah, blah. But what's the point? To prove to someone who has a hard-on to talk out his a$$? Nah, that's ok.

I've found that "defensively" victories (sic) can be found on many fronts. Show me where you've went on the attack and have had equal success. Oh wait, you can't can you? And that's obvious because this nonsense is still going on.

Until people like you learn to be respectful as what you want in return, we'll always have the Cody's of the world pounding on there chest about how big and bad they are. So in wrap up and in finality of this little saga of ours:

The biggest and baddest on the bottom, is STILL on the bottom.

Keep poppin' ya collars Big Bad Cody.