Court Room Success!

[Akira]

Sampson,

EXCELLENT !!!

and a thumbs up for Pasco, too !

[TheBlackTruth]

sampson,

Great job!

Now, the next step is to finish what you started.

You need to sue for the false arrest.

Only when we start doing that will change begin to occur.

SUE FOR FALSE ARREST!

-BT

[Camino]

Originally Posted by wirlwind

Please explain spelling your name with a dash and a colon. I don't know what that means.

I believe the correct common law format is:

: FirstGivenName-OtherGivenName(s): Surname

[Jerseee]

Originally Posted by Pasco

Hi Everyone,

My name is Greg and I am the owner of TicketSlayer.com. My congratulations to Sampson on his traffic win. You did a fantastic job Sampson. (not his real but, his screen name of course)

One of the things I noted special about Sampson's case was that the judge readily agreed to hold a hearing on the motions. This was the proper thing to do since; the DA disputed the validity of the documents. In fact, the DA said that the common law default documents were incomprehensible. Incomprehensible indeed! Maybe so, provided that the DA was an absolute moron. More than likely, the DA knew his goose was cooked when he defaulted by not rebutting the Affidavit of Truth.

The DA also claimed that the default only applied to civil cases. Funny thing, Samson's charges were all minor infractions not punishable by jail time. That in my ever so humble opinion this falls into the category of civil since, there are only two classifications of trials; civil or criminal. Even so, the common law default has been used many times in misdemeanor traffic cases involving possible jail time and never before has the default been challenged, by the DA as being applicable only to civil cases. Regardless, traffic courts are administrative courts and therefore civil in nature.

The DA also had another problem. This flesh and blood person, (Sampson) a creation of God the Father, standing before the court is claiming that, he is not the person whose name appears in ALL CAPS on the citation; that legal fiction the state claims to be him.

Without proper legal proof that you are the legal fiction charged by the state, or you have willingly and knowingly agreed in a legally binding contract signed by the real you to be responsible for said fiction; the court can not legally invoke jurisdiction and proceed to try you.

So, without legal proof that you are the same person as the legal fiction or that you have willingly and knowingly agreed to be legally responsible for the legal fiction the state created for you, the judge must dismiss for lack of proper jurisdiction.

Greg

PS: My many thanks to all you Sui Jurist members who have purchased my common law legal documents and have supported me on the Sui Jurist forum.

Pasco,

Our hats off to you as well!! I may not be able to speak on behalf of all of our members but so far I see you provide a valuable service in concert with our struggle for personal freedom. Thanks!!

another time the court could not get one of the people to stand in for a person

[rearguard]

'The city doesn't have time for this gibberish, we dismiss these minor charges (tinted windows and no front license plate).

Has anyone bothered to consider that perhaps the ONLY reason why the case was dismissed was simply because the charges were very minor and the city really had better things to do than argue with the jibberish about the spelling of a name?

The cause and effect is simply not demonstrated in this case, and anyone going into court using similar techniques had better understand this.

Yes, I have my Notice of Copyright handy and will admit this into evidence. So far, I have claimed Sui Juris status and the Judge looked like he got hit with a brick! His smirk turned into a surprised look of....What? Oh no! Not one of those! My wife saw this and there were about 10 other people in there, now they keep me for last when everyone is out of the courtroom. This is my first appearance as Sui Juris and I am nervous but not afraid anymore, in fact, I am very confident in the courtroom. I hope that I can maintain the poster. For those of you who want to know of the name in colon, it is proper punctuation of a name according to the rules of grammar. It is known that time is puncuated in that manner, Example: 3:15. This distinguishes the difference between the 3 and 15. For instance, if you just wrote down 3 15, or 315, what would you think? This type of information is used in the courts today. That is why President Clinton said: "It depends on what the word "is" is. Language is open to definition and etc. . I hope that this clears the name issue up a little. The NAME in ALL CAPS signifies the nature of your name. It has been established that it means you are a subject of the CORPORATE GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, STATE OF........... .

[quote=lonnie]Yes, I have my Notice of Copyright handy and will admit this into evidence. So far, I have claimed Sui Juris status and the Judge looked like he got hit with a brick! His smirk turned into a surprised look of....What? Oh no! Not one of those! My wife saw this and there were about 10 other people in there, now they keep me for last when everyone is out of the courtroom. This is my first appearance as Sui Juris and I am nervous but not afraid anymore, in fact, I am very confident in the courtroom. I hope that I can maintain the poster. For those of you who want to know of the name in colon, it is proper punctuation of a name according to the rules of grammar. It is known that time is puncuated in that manner, Example: 3:15. This distinguishes the difference between the 3 and 15. For instance, if you just wrote down 3 15, or 315, what would you think? This type of information is used in the courts today. That is why President Clinton said: "It depends on what the word "is" is. Language is open to definition and etc. . I hope that this clears the name issue up a little. The NAME in ALL CAPS signifies the nature of your name. It has been established that it means you are a subject of the CORPORATE GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, STATE OF...........

[EnSabahNur]

Originally Posted by rushpat

I've heard of colon and comma:

Last: First, Middle

Sorry, I don't know if someone has corrected this yet, but that is wrong.

It is John-Henry: Doe, and the reason is that this is proper English, and proper grammer. You can leave out the colon, but the colon means "of the Doe family", or "Of the Doe Clan". ANY variation of that proper name is NOT your name but that of a legal fiction. Last name first is Military style, and despite the colon and dash is still improper. Even spelling it with the dash and colon but using an initial for your given names is wrong.

John-H: Doe, is a legal fiction.

Living men/women don't have a first, middle, and last name. That is for Legal Fictions. Living men/women have a family, or surname, and given names. Even then that is simply a "Commonly known as" name since you are not a thing, and CANNOT be spedifically identified, only things can be specifically identified.

That is why we do NOT have an address either, but a place of domicile. How can a living thing have a fixed address...you are free willed, you can go where you please. Your domicile is simply the place you are most likely to return to at the end of the day to rest your head.

Some of the many tricks used to decieve.

[weishaupt1776]

Big up again to Pasco's victory.

Howecer, I find it hard to believe that violent, anti-social members of a private club who impose the written will of men & women, calling themselves a legislature, through armed minions threatening your life, liberty, & property(LLP) by duress & coercion; really care about how you spell your name.