Court Room Success!

I ordered the ticket slayer docs from http://ticketslayer.com/index.htm because I received two tickets a couple of months ago. Filed all docs, defaulted the DA, went to court and the judge had yet to review my docs. He rescheduled the court date to review my motions. Went to court today and SUCCESS!

I went to the motion hearing today and initially told the Judge I'm hear on Special Appearance only, he said 'yeah.' He then said 'what's your name?' I said "I'm a Sovereign, flesh & blood, living being with the appellation of Ch -Will : Her .' (name withheld) He said 'Is this your signature?' I said "That's my autograph.' He said 'This is how you spell your name with a dash and colon?' I said 'That is correct.' He said 'Why don't you sign your name with a dash and a colon?' I said 'They are both my personal property and that's how I sign my name.' He then asked the DA how he wanted to proceed and the DA said 'The city doesn't have time for this gibberish, we dismiss these minor charges (tinted windows and no front license plate).' Judge said 'Prosecution move to dismiss and I concur so CASE DISMISSED!'

Know who you are and it works!

[wirlwind]

Please explain spelling your name with a dash and a colon. I don't know what that means.

[rushpat]

I've heard of colon and comma:

Last: First, Middle

[wirlwind]

Thanks, Rushpat.That was the dumb,- now here is the dumber-how is that significant?

[KaosTheory]

Congrats on a cool win!!

KT

[suijuris]

Good job! Into the sucess file this must go!

[charlesa6]

Good job! good job! Sampson.

[Jerseee]

Congrats Sampson!!! Thanks for sharing.

[Pasco]

Hi Everyone,

My name is Greg and I am the owner of TicketSlayer.com. My congratulations to Sampson on his traffic win. You did a fantastic job Sampson. (not his real but, his screen name of course)

One of the things I noted special about Sampson's case was that the judge readily agreed to hold a hearing on the motions. This was the proper thing to do since; the DA disputed the validity of the documents. In fact, the DA said that the common law default documents were incomprehensible. Incomprehensible indeed! Maybe so, provided that the DA was an absolute moron. More than likely, the DA knew his goose was cooked when he defaulted by not rebutting the Affidavit of Truth.

The DA also claimed that the default only applied to civil cases. Funny thing, Samson's charges were all minor infractions not punishable by jail time. That in my ever so humble opinion this falls into the category of civil since, there are only two classifications of trials; civil or criminal. Even so, the common law default has been used many times in misdemeanor traffic cases involving possible jail time and never before has the default been challenged, by the DA as being applicable only to civil cases. Regardless, traffic courts are administrative courts and therefore civil in nature.

The DA also had another problem. This flesh and blood person, (Sampson) a creation of God the Father, standing before the court is claiming that, he is not the person whose name appears in ALL CAPS on the citation; that legal fiction the state claims to be him.

Without proper legal proof that you are the legal fiction charged by the state, or you have willingly and knowingly agreed in a legally binding contract signed by the real you to be responsible for said fiction; the court can not legally invoke jurisdiction and proceed to try you.

So, without legal proof that you are the same person as the legal fiction or that you have willingly and knowingly agreed to be legally responsible for the legal fiction the state created for you, the judge must dismiss for lack of proper jurisdiction.

Greg

PS: My many thanks to all you Sui Jurist members who have purchased my common law legal documents and have supported me on the Sui Jurist forum.

[gregtu]

sampson, great job!!!!