biosocioprolepsis

[David Merrill]

The U.S. Department of Justice for the IMFIRS was hot after destroying this man. They have been pestering him for years and he has just endured process the whole while. Refusal for cause and an occasional verified statement of right.

Last night he got the first night's sleep in forever.

It seems as though the chief judge in Denver finally understands. He mailed to both the presumed legal name on the case brought by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and to the true name on the verified statement of right.

I drafted the verified statement of right for the suitor when he showed me a motion adjunct to the hearing. One of the purposes of the hearing was to decide if his wife should be named a "co-tenant". The inference is that these good people are tenants (vassals) in their own home! That was the primary exception taken in the verified statement of right. No wonder it worked so magnificently!

I apologize for rendering the images unusable. With the recent Quatloser treatment and Bill Smith I would never do anything to subject the man and his lovely wife to such complete uncaring and rude jabs. [Thank you Elfninosmom (Bill Smith?) for calling my clerk for the sole purpose of casting aspersions about me. That was a valuable lesson.]


Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. http://www.quatloos.com/TaxForums/vi...01642&start=24

[weishaupt1776]

Killer Job, David. I am involved in another area of study right now, but I intend on milking the stuff you've posted.

I'm sure the hens are a cacklin' this hour over at the slave ship

[David Merrill]

Over at the Slave Ship (Quatloos) their reality is just as real to them as ours is to us.

Mostly attorneys Prof and Wserra, being in my mind representative. Well at least they tried to make sense of history instead of just attacking my character. For instance I think it was wserra who said, "Oh, you mean the Whacko Thirteenth Amendment." In his reality the de jure Thirteenth Amendment was never even ratified! If that were the case how is it found in the Session Laws of the Colorado Territory in 1861 and 1864?

They do not even want to discuss War and Emergency Powers from 1933. That is a little too real for them. With the Federal Reserve Bulletin, State Department Bulletin, Statutes at Large and The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt etc. etc. Although I have to admit that by the time I brought up the subject of how the Bankers' Holiday effected the nature of money, in their Quatloser reality, they thought they had pretty well shredded my character and standing as a sane writer.

And you have to admit, they have a particularly simple clerical device for destroying any truth that threatens their reality. A forum called Ranting and Raving that automatically tosses any Topic if nobody writes for five days. But I believe two Topics in the Stupid Shams catagory were simply deleted without going through that process.

In high school I was honored, I later found out to have taken a small class about bisocioprolepsis. A word broken down to mean two - social factions - in paralysis (with one another). The word applied here means that either we are crazy or they are crazy.

Finally one poster on Quatloos spoke up with something I have heard way too many times. That I need to slip in fecies while running for my life in a Third-World back alley town to understand it is time for me to get a life and start applying all this energy to making the world a better place. Maybe.

Another poster there pointed out that fractional banking has been going on for centuries; at least since Colonial times in early America. Very true. I quoted Proverbs 11:1 and heard nothing back. So bankers have been juggling false balances for a long time - still false balances. I attended a grand jury with a couple outstanding speakers, Wichita, Kansas.

An economist explained in simple terms why Roosevelt had to make it illegal for people to redeem their gold. There simply was not enough - too much had been stolen by the stellionation (selling something twice) of fractional reserve banking.

Therefore we have two very real realities competing. One thing in favor of the truth; any society that fractionalizes or converts to fiat currencies in history fails. Always. The risk management algorithms (Basel II; G-8 etc.) are being stretched beyond control compensation. It is like the light crude oil prices are being driven almost completely by teams of psychiatrists psychoanalyzing investment fear and greed habits - not the actual price of the product.

http://www.ancofutures.com/quotes.html



Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. I remember Mark Darling, the jurist for New York apologizing because he had no more of the final draft news releases. He was apologizing for giving me a marked up near-final draft. Get that! He was actually apologizing for giving me a unique momento of the event. It is now framed and on the wall.

[BOBT12]

Take a look at this!

July 15, 2005

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Peter Hendrickson
phendrickson ‘at’ losthorizons.com


WHILE LATE-FILERS STRUGGLE WITH TAX FORMS
READERS OF NEW BOOK REALIZE THEY OWE $0

COMMERCE TWP, MI. Scores of readers of a new book entitled Cracking the Code: The Fascinating Truth About Taxation in America have come to realize that the federal income tax does not apply to them. They have requested – and received – full refunds of all the money withheld from their pay-- including Social Security “contributions”. The total of just those of which Cracking the Code author, Pete Hendrickson, has been sent copies for posting on his website, www.losthorizons.com, is well over $370,000.00, and is growing rapidly.

“The reason most people are confused about their legal obligations,” says Hendrickson, ”is that they use the everyday meaning of such terms as ‘income, wages, employer, employee,’ and others. In fact,” he adds, “these terms have narrow, legal meanings within the tax law.”

How narrow? Hendrickson says they only apply to certain privileged activities, such as holding or administering a government office, or working in one.

“Although the tax statutes make perfectly clear that, for instance, language describing the obligations of ‘employees’ – and the taxes to which ‘employees’ are subject – only apply to a small minority of American workers, the distinction is artfully concealed in the Internal Revenue Code representation of the law,” he says. “An elaborate system has been created which causes many people to whom the tax laws do not otherwise apply to naively declare themselves to be among the persons to whom those laws do apply, and to tax themselves accordingly.”

The IRS is, of course, perfectly happy to take them at their word. And to take their money.

The government’s response to all of this – aside from providing full refunds when confronted – has been an attempt by the IRS to suppress publication of the book as “promoting an abusive tax shelter.”

“I’m not helping, or even advising, anyone to ‘shelter’ anything,” responds Hendrickson. “Nor am I claiming, like others have, that the income tax is unconstitutional. It isn’t. The only thing I’m promoting is a book that tells the truth about the tax code.”

The US Justice Department apparently agrees. It has informed the IRS three times now that it would not proceed with any legal actions against Hendrickson.

================================

IRS apparently agrees by issuing COMPLETE refunds of all taxes withheld, including FICA and medicare.

More:
================================

Victory After Victory, Verification After Verification; It's Time To Step On The Gas

'Cracking the Code-...' warrior Ralph Richardson has received a complete refund-- Social Security 'contributions' and all-- of everything withheld from him and given to the federal government in taxes during 2004. The evidence of Ralph's success in helping to restore liberty and limited government in America can be seen at www.losthorizons.com/tax/MoreVictories4.htm.

*****
CtC warrior Gary Utter also shares a victory with us today-- a complete federal refund for 2002. There's a story associated with this one, though:

Gary had had earnings from two different companies in 2002-- one of which considered Gary to be staff, withheld from him, and created a W-2 about its payments to him; and the other of which viewed Gary as a contractor and issued a 1099 about him. He had originally filed a return for that year of the 'conventional' sort. However, even as a 'conventional' filing, this one had a complication. During 2002, Gary had not made any "self-employment" tax payments in connection with his 'contractor' earnings. Concerned about not having done so, he filed a 'Form SS-8 Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding', and received notification that he could consider himself to have been an "employee" of that company for tax purposes. Gary completed his original 1040 accordingly, using the tax tables to calculate a 'conventional "tax due" based on earnings from both companies and subtracting from that figure only what had been listed by the title "Federal income tax withheld" on the W-2 he had received from the one company which had engaged in withholding.

Then Gary read 'Cracking the Code-...' and learned the truth.

Two months ago, Gary filed an amended return for 2002, reflecting his new understanding of the law. Included was a declaration rescinding his signature on the 'Form SS-8' mentioned above, which Gary now realizes to have been both improper and unnecessary. His amended return-- filed with a rebuttal to the allegations made on the 1099 he had received from the one company; and with a Form 4852 correcting the erroneous "wage" information on the W-2 he had received from the other-- claimed a refund of EVERYTHING actually withheld as "income" tax from Gary during that year, which, as he now knows, includes what is nominally withheld as 'Social Security tax' and 'Medicare' tax.

The government's response? Conformity with the law, and a complete refund to Gary. The evidence of Gary's victory for the rule of law, and the related documents, can be seen at www.losthorizons.com/tax/MoreVictories4.htm.

*****
In the roughly two weeks since the program was initiated, many 'Cracking the Code-...' warriors have signed up for state groups. Groups are now active in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Utah Virginia, Washington and Wyoming. Warriors in Arkansas, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York and France are waiting for some company.

Please consider joining or forming your state's group, if you haven't already. It costs nothing; there aren't any chores-- it's an entirely self-directed thing.

Of course, I can't promise that you'll get anything more out of joining than you pay to do so... But I felt pretty affirmed about this concept early last week when a member of the California Warriors happily announced, "California has given me a complete refund of my 2002 taxes paid plus interest!" I reflected on how uplifting that announcement must have been for the others in the group, and how good and proper it is for this upstanding American hero to have neighbors and friends with whom he could share this news who could understand its significance in the same way that he can.

*****
The discussion titled 'A Special Note For Non-Filers' has been updated. Although most of you will imagine that something so titled will be of no interest, I encourage everyone to read (or re-read) this piece. It offers a nice little in-a-nutshell presentation of the practical aspects of the tax structure that is easily absorbed and easily retained. This is a particularly good article to send around to friends and acquaintances who are aware that the reality of the "income" tax structure is not as presented by the beneficiaries of misunderstanding, but have not yet learned the truth.

*****
The goal of correcting the decades-old "income" tax misunderstanding under which so many Americans have suffered so much outrage and harm-- and by, and for the sake of which, so much corruption of principle and so much lawless expansion of government power has been facilitated-- is finally within reach. But my single, small voice cannot do it alone. Please help. Please forward this and future emails; please pick the emails of your choice for distribution from those posted for that purpose at www.losthorizons.com/tax/Emailers.htm, and please print and post the press release at www.losthorizons.com/tax/PressRelease.htm. Post it (mail it) to your local newspaper, TV station, radio station, etc.; post it to your favorite blog and newsgroup; post it to your favorite pundit; and post copies on every public bulletin board you can find. Your grocery store, library, school and workplace probably offers a place to hang such an item among all the announcements for free kittens, handyman services for hire, and upcoming art fairs.

Leave copies on restaurant tables, in taxicabs, and hotel rooms-- you can't give a better tip! Use your imagination, and help spread the word. All that is necessary to re-tighten the chains of the Constitution is widespread awareness of the truth, and all that is necessary to achieve that widespread awareness is awakening enough Americans to the idea that there is a falsehood at work.

Progress does not require that you banish the darkness-- only that you shed a little light. At this point, five or ten of every hundred people merely made conscious of the idea that there is something to look into will undertake their own education. That's sufficient, if enough are given the chance to make that choice. This email is going to thousands across America and, in fact, around the world. If each of you makes even a small effort to raise the consciousness of at least a few others, many more-- all those fives and tens-- will soon add their efforts to yours. Next it will not be five or ten out of a hundred who awaken, but fifteen or twenty, because all will have been stirred a bit in their slumbers by the growing activity around them. And so on, and so on....

http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=481

More Information:

http://losthorizons.com/

http://famguardian.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=443

[David Merrill]

Dear BOBT12;


There are many letters generated about frivolous tax returns on Hendrickson's filings. There may be two supposed results from these returns.

1) If the IMFIRS is organized enough to be communicating policies to the agent level, where they analyze and process returns, then there may be a percentage process where they say, "Allow a certain amounts of wins." Return some, refuse some. The intelligence I get is that none of these "frivolous returns" are met with the traditional $500 fine per filing. Also, a recent Hendrickson advocate was told by an agent over the phone that if he was not going to declare his income correctly then he should not file at all. The Treasury agent told this guy over the phone not to file. [Be very careful not to entertain any such agents over the phone. There is no culpability about what is said.]

2) The IMFIRS is not organized enough to be handling the Hendrickson 'phenomenon' over the broad agent interaction landscape. So many agents read a 'zero-income' return and just generate a "frivolous" return letter. Many agents do not want to deal with that discretionary authority so they pass these returns up the ladder where they get more professional legal attention and thus, a victory.

I am assuming this has to do with bisocioprolepsis, why you posted Pete Hendrickson here. And I have to admit that I have never read his book. For a long time I thought it was the same old "Cracking the Code" UCC/Redemption stuff by the same title. Being so out of the system, off the grid, I get by without the contract trappings. But it is important to most, even myself to be able to interface through commerce. And that is the heart of the matter.

The basic theory, and supported by the article above, is that taxation is only for government employees. This terminology and linguistic symbology goes back quite some time here. And the IMFIRS Treasury is facing a major confrontation with words of art that may directly effect the right of arrest.

The de facto Thirteenth Amendment is in abolishing slavery. Several suitors have tried exercising the right to take responsibility for making arrests through Rule C(3)(a)(ii)(B) only to be turned down by U.S. clerks who seem to say "plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney" means "U.S. Attorneys and federal judges". Upon close examination of the in rem arrest process we find that vessels in personam, people being treated like property and arrested, are exempt if the vessels are owned by the United States.

Examination of the de jure Thirteenth Amendment tells us that a man loses his United States citizenship if he accepts emoluments, gifts and Titles of Nobility from a foreign power. Something being in a free country makes no sense about that without words of art. Because in a free country we should be able to accept gifts and titles of nobility. The word of art is actually no word of art at all - citizen of the United States is a federal employee. Always has been. Careful reading of the Constitution reveals that people claiming the benefits of citizenship were state Citizens. The states in compact actually are designed to work as independent nations which share international trading rights with outsiders, who exclusively to outsiders see 'us' as the United States.

Now we can examine the de facto Fourteenth Amendment in a proper light. The Constitution prohibited the blacks from becoming proper state Citizens. But there was a certain privilege package given to those state Citizens who gave up that citizenry to serve in the U.S. government - citizens of the United States. That was what was awarded to the emancipated blacks; status of citizen of the United States - the same as federal employees. [Status: state of 'us' as in U.S. - the states in compact. By examining the bold type, you can start to see the numero-linguistics - the ties in substrate. Status is a relatively new word.]

Pete Hendrickson relies on a paragraph left off the back of the Notices of Levy and Lien; paragraph §6331 (a). Not that there is anything wrong with leaving irrelevant paragraphs off the back of a notice. The paragraph in the code says all government employees are subject to liens and levys. True. But the history (so I hear) of that paragraph is a true government employee importing liquors who argued that he was not subject to taxation on his income from such because he was a government employee. He lost and Congress added the paragraph. It does not even mean that non-government employees are exempt in itself!

Now we jump to an employer of mine who at first was behind my de-taxing or whatever and then got scared and fired me. She called up the IMF agent and was told point-blank when confronting about §6331 (a), "All citizens of the United States are federal employees." As explained above, this is true.

I am guiding you carefully into a perspective, a position where you can get a glimpse of the muddle words of art have put the Treasury in regarding Pete Hendrickson. Mainly for the purpose of hoping you will see what the restoration of the right of arrest to the common man will have in resolving bisocioprolepsis. Treating people chattel, indentured employees who pay for the privilege of working for the United States without good faith or knowledge they are employees of the State (United States). The IMFIRS Treasury is trapped by its own manipulation of wording. The options are not favorable.

1) Tell everyone that taxation on income is slavery. That by being citizens of the United States instead of state Citizens, they are federal employees and subject to levy and lien according to §6331 (a)

or

2) give them a full return for simply declaring "0" income. According to the law.

Option "1)" is clearly in violation of the de facto Thirteenth Amendment.

Over time the Treasury has slipped into some very cruel shoes.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[BOBT12]

Originally posted by David Merrill
I am assuming this has to do with bisocioprolepsis, why you posted Pete Hendrickson here. And I have to admit that I have never read his book. For a long time I thought it was the same old "Cracking the Code" UCC/Redemption stuff by the same title. Being so out of the system, off the grid, I get by without the contract trappings. But it is important to most, even myself to be able to interface through commerce. And that is the heart of the matter.

The basic theory, and supported by the article above, is that taxation is only for government employees. This terminology and linguistic symbology goes back quite some time here. And the IMFIRS Treasury is facing a major confrontation with words of art that may directly effect the right of arrest.

Thanks for your excellent reply to my post. Your work is outstanding, I am very happy to be treated to your extensive research.

However, as you may note in the edit line of that post, I posted on this thread in error.

[David Merrill]

I found a Topic on Quatloos about this fine forum. This kind of research is always enlightening to me. However you may just find it sickening.

http://www.quatloos.com/TaxForums/vi...=asc&s tart=0

I should add that bisocioprolepsis is a catchword that never caught on. It was invented by a '70s author Marshall McLuhan (I think). I believe the idea is utilized in the book, The Message is the Message. [Designed interchangeable between written message and relaxing message.] At least that was one of the books we read in studying bisocioprolepsis. Alvin Toffler; I remember that name too. We read Future Shock too.

http://imediaconnection.com/content/3046.asp
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/se...700419-8602241



Enjoy,

David Merrill.