OAS Win !!! (part 1)

[charlesa6]

Originally Posted by seeker

I still don't understand what happened there -- except that none of the filings actually went into the EVIDENCE file, just the docket file.

Seeker

You have to do cover letter or memo to list all the evidence in your doc that bounded with your case as Exibit "A" or "B" in other to be sort out as evidence file in your record. Furthermore, you have to make a copy for yourself and a copy for the court. Why?,because if the judge concealed your evidence you still have one in your possession as a proof.

[Akira]

To All,

Thanks... it's good to be back.. although my 'plate' is still quite full... it will probably be at least another month or so before I can contribute to the degree I used to...

I actually won this case in March... but after 2+ years of studing every spare minute and a few trips to the slammer, I was due for a small vacation ! It took a few days, just to come to terms with the fact that I won ! lol


Seeker,

You are essentially correct. The court will leave no stone unturned, in an attempt to presume jurisdiction.

In my case, it was the request for jury trial, and subsequent move to superior court (to get away from the moron judges in district court).

This is the reason I first addressed who I REALLY was... then attacked the misnomer, then attacked the presumption I was a corporate or legal entity created by congress, that anything I said was intended TO BE TESTIMONY, or that I was there to CONDUCT BUSINESS and / or CONTRACT with ANYONE !

Your friend goofed because:

An UNREBUTTED STATEMENT, whether written or verbal, STANDS AS TRUTH !

SILENCE IS AQUIESENCE !

By not saying a word, by not challenging every word that was contrary to his position, your friend ACCEPTED what was said as TRUTH ! and VOLUNTEERED ! He allowed the DA's words, as well as the judge's words to stand !

You must object to everything you disagree with !

All I did was anticipate their presumptions, based on study and experience.

They will also use your answering the simplest questions to assume your aquiesence to their jursidiction. Just answering a question like "where do you work" with a volunteered answer is enough....

You must take command at every step !

When the judge was so very sweet and unassuming, and asked me "would you mind answering a few questions for me?" (it was the first clue I had, that I had him where I wanted him... a night and day difference to previous encounters) HE WAS OFFERING TO CONTRACT !!! So I modified the the offer with a condition, which negated the very reason he was trying to contract... see? ("On the condition that they are not used as a tool to usurp my rights and/or otherwise impose your authority on me")

They are the devil incarnate. They are his minions, and do his bidding. Make no mistake ! Remember the early Loony Tune cartoons, from the 30's, where the Devil always asked to sign the contract? Bingo !

I probably seem a bit fanatical here... but it s really that simple... and they will use the simplest of invitations, even implied ones, to latch on and leech !

Remember, the ONLY God sanctioned corporation in the world, is the family ! All others are seen as leeches and are scorned by God, as they produce nothing, and are born of, and exist off, the labor of others.

Bottom line...

You must be aware of their 'law' and procedures, but you must KNOW common law... that is the dejure state citizen's remedy...

You are correct... Petition to Dismiss is the correct approach in common law.. as opposed to Motion to Dismiss... which is a statuatory procedure... but frankly, because, despite all the hours of study, I still considered myself a 'newbie', I went with something I knew had a huge chance of winning (if it works.. don't fix it). Now in hindsight, I may change the name of the doc... But, it's a minor point.... as long as you rebut the presumption, you have nothing to fear !

Hope this helps !!

For HIS Glory,
Akira

[charlesa6]

Keep up the good fight Akira. Congrat!

[Akira]

Originally Posted by weishaupt1776

Would it be presumptuous to ask you for the edits that do not appear in the ticketslayer docs?

The main doc I am curious about is what is in your MtD.

The only major change in the MtD was that this STATE doesn't use a Notice of Infraction or a Notice to Appear. The 'ticket' I was given simple says 'NOTICE'

The most noteworthy change I made in the Affidavit of Truth, was that I had done the Cancellatura / Default process slightly more than a year ago, where I had declared myself, to NOT be a citizen of the STATE OF MAINE, INC. (sic) or the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. (sic) and had revoked all signatures and contracts based on non-disclosure, deception and fraud.

Other than that, it was business as usual ! ;)

---------------------

To All,


Now the REAL fight begins......

It's relatively easy to play defense, once you understand their stategy... but going on the offense, is a whole different ballgame.

Habeas Corpus is where it's at !!

Unrebutted affidavits first, then a combo punch of Habeas Corpus, and leining their assets seems to be the way... back to some serious study !

Anyone know where I can find the latest winning lottery ticket ? hehe

For HIS Glory,
Akira

[Fazer700]

Originally Posted by Jerseee

Way to go Akira! Walk with him and you're walking the walk of the righteous and fear no evil.

Thanks for the posts and all the following information. Way to go Akira! This whole forum is nothing but a wealth of information. A lawfull money, gold mine.

Fazer

[iamfreeru2]

Akira,

Well done brother!! That is what I call being in honor. You gave honor and glory to the only one that deserves it, Yeshua the Christ our risen Savior. You have and will be blessed for it. The court had no choice but to do what it did. Well done indeed.

[Logan]

I am a man truly humbled by your courage, confidence and strength. I am a "newbie" and am inspired by your story. Thank you for sharing.

And congrats.

Logan



This site and its contributors are AWESOME!

Wow.

I am impressed.

Bob

[suijuris]

Akira,

This is simply amazing, you rock!

[weishaupt1776]

Originally Posted by Akira

The only decision before the court today is whether the court will act on my Writ of Mandamus, or leave that to a higher court.

I stand on my documents as presented.

Further affiant sayeth naught.and I stand mute.[/size][/color]

You must stand firm on the writ... and not let the judge sway you !

That's the thing, the Mandamus IS the sticking point in the Default process.

I did file an extra writ when I did mine. It was the writ of praecipe to the clerk to enter the default judgement