Belanger, the same who ‘raised hell in court’ …..

Minister Belanger is the same who ‘raised hell in court’ …..


http://ecclesia.org/forum/post.asp?m...07&FORUM_ID=20

This a letter from a Minster from our Church that stopped the intimidation. You heard right he has not been bothered by them since. This notice of Good faith and demand is a result of the discovery that the CCRA officials are not truly allegiant to the Queen and are truly imposters charading as wolves in sheep's clothing. They have no authority!

Do any among us imply that all the laws of man apply to us??

Do any deny Deuteronomy 4:2; 12:32 and God's command to not bow to false God's??

If they add to God's law, as they have, are they of God?? So if they are not of God and are intimidating us to bow to pay taxes that are not supported in scripture as being applicable to us, are we supposed to bow in contradiction of what Shadrak Meshak and abednigo did?? Did Daniel eat the Kings food??

So the site I showed you above is proof irrefutable the laws not in line with God's law are not applicable to us as men under God and his law. All you have to do is abate their laws with a private notice to them as per the instructions of Jesus at Matthew 18:15-20 and bring them into agreement with you.

If they ignore you and force you into one of their fictional proceedings such as taxes you can call all those private men and women to testify that you made them privately aware as of your faith you can not \bow nor submit to their codes rules and regulations that are in addition to and in derogation to God's law.

They have no public power to cause you to nor to intimidate you to violate your faith and break God's first command law of Exodus 20:3-5

The Queens agent so to speak in Canada has admitted she is a defacto ruler. The World Bank who is the creditor has admitted that defacto means unlawful! Illegitimate!! With no sanction of the Christian monarch since 1931. She [agent] acts as a false God! What is the Governor General's position in Government?

Canada is a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy. This means Canadians recognize The Queen as our Head of State. Canada's 26th Governor General, the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, carries out Her Majesty's duties in Canada on a daily basis and is Canada's de facto Head of State.

The governments act as collectors for the creditor the world bank with all the indentured and bonded men and women as slaves and debtors as the word constitutor means volunteering to pay the debt of another!

OP 7.30July 2001

These policies were prepared for use by World Bank staff and are not necessarily a complete treatment of the subject.

Dealings with De Facto Governments
______________________________________________
Note:This OP 7.30 replaces OP 7.30, dated November 1994. Questions may be addressed to the Chief Counsel, Operations Policy.
______________________________________________
1. A "de facto government" comes into, or remains in, power by means not provided for in the country's constitution, such as a coup d'état, revolution, usurpation, abrogation or suspension of the constitution.

[powder]

Very interesting.

Originally Posted by free_martha

Canada is a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy.

I wish more people could see this.

I have had many long debates with many many people about this very subject. I say to them, what if I want to start the government of Powder. Their response - you can't. My immediate response: How is that democracy.... Ya but you can start a party in the Gov't of Canada.

Every political figure is in on the scam. The only difference being some of them 'actually know' what we know.

When one speaks in lies, decit and is willing to use violence to enforce the lies and decit..... the house of cards start to sway when simple, basic questions are asked.

Is Canada a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy? The governor-general says on her website that she is the defacto head of Canada, and it is PRESUMED that the Queen is the De jure head of state … what if there is no de jure head of state? With the Statute of Westminster 1931 each province was declared to be its own nation and parliament was to be disbanded, a constitution formed and ratified by each man and woman in each province giving their consent to be a part of Canada. However, as that was never done, each province and Canada remains, to this day, in a state anarchy.

http://www.saltspring.com/bobmcginnwalter_kuhl.htm

Delivered in the House of Commons on Thursday, November 8, 1945, by Mr. W. F. KUHL

“Legally, Canada is in a state of anarchy, and has been so since December 11, 1931. All power to govern in Canada since the enactment of the Statute of Westminster has resided with the provinces of Canada, and all power legally remains there until such time as the provinces sign an agreement and ratify a constitution; whereby, they delegate such powers as they desire upon a central government of their own creation. Since December 11, 1931, the Parliament of Canada has governed Canada on assumed [DE FACTO?] power only.”

Dealings with De Facto Governments
______________________________________________
Note: This OP 7.30 replaces OP 7.30, dated November 1994. Questions may be addressed to the Chief Counsel, Operations Policy.
______________________________________________
1. A "de facto government" comes into, or remains in, power by means not provided for in the country's constitution, such as a coup d'état, revolution, usurpation, abrogation or suspension of the constitution.

From recent evidence presented to the High Court of Great Britain by the movement to nullify the false Australian constitution and government (March 6/03), "the Queen is a Public Servant. She is a part and parcel of the United Kingdom Parliament, and consequently she does not hold any Executive Authority over Canada, nor has she ever had any Executive Authority over over Canada.?
How can the Queen be a constitutional Monarch in Canada, when as an independent State, we have never set-up a Monarchy; nor, have we set-up an Act of Secession?

The Statutes Revision Act of 1893 (BR.) rescinded Section 2 of the BNA Act 1867, the Secession right of British Monarchs provision for Canada. The Privy Council has replied in writing:

"The Queen cannot by British Law, hold a Constitutional or Executive Position in other than the United Kingdom. The Privy Council has confirmed, that as the British Parliament has no Executive Authority over Canada, therefore the Queen cannot have any authority over Canada."