Go Back   Suijuris Forums > General Discussion > Success Stories
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-17-2006, 05:27 AM
scooterdog scooterdog is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by love117
Hi.
I am going into court soon and am planning to use a defense that argues that I cannot pay what the collection agency wants because, in compliance with article I, section X of the constitution, only gold and silver coin, or lawful money back by gold and silver can be uksed to pay a debt.
Can you offer any help in my success along those lines?
I appreciate any feedback.
Rich

There is a CD on credit cards,(this may be helpfull for you situation) at outlawslegal.com I wouldn't hire them, as they'll screw you out of your money, but they do have alot of usefull information.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-17-2006, 06:37 AM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
americasovereign, welcome to the forum.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-17-2006, 06:47 AM
scooterdog scooterdog is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akira
Short of time today... details will be forthcoming...

Once again, I won (charges dismissed), using the techniques, the local naysayers, claim don't work... Common Law Defaults, PJ & SMJ challenges, ect. all that Patriot Nutjob stuff !!


Mad props to my Heavenly Father, and all my friends at SJ, who have unselfishly offered their support !


Psalm 18:48 He delivereth me from mine enemies: yea, thou liftest me up above those that rise up against me: thou hast delivered me from the violent man.


For HIS Glory,
Akira

Akira:
Please hurry up and tell us!!!! I know I've waited all weekend to read what it was, and how you went about it, again.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-17-2006, 08:14 AM
FreeFromContract's Avatar
FreeFromContract FreeFromContract is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akira
Short of time today... details will be forthcoming...

Once again, I won (charges dismissed), using the techniques, the local naysayers, claim don't work... Common Law Defaults, PJ & SMJ challenges, ect. all that Patriot Nutjob stuff !!

Mad props to my Heavenly Father, and all my friends at SJ, who have unselfishly offered their support !

Psalm 18:48 He delivereth me from mine enemies: yea, thou liftest me up above those that rise up against me: thou hast delivered me from the violent man.

For HIS Glory,
Akira


Congratulations Akira.
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-17-2006, 08:35 AM
Akira's Avatar
Akira Akira is offline
Sui Juris Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
working on it now...
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel

"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-17-2006, 12:49 PM
Akira's Avatar
Akira Akira is offline
Sui Juris Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
Sorry I haven't replied sooner... It was a moral imperative to run away for the weekend.. lol

This situation is actually 3 separate events, and 5 charges, which, to date, has culmanated into 2 wins, and one decision still being appealed. I wanted to present the entire senario from beginning to end, I may add more detail, but this is a start.. I offer this as a "heads up" of what to expect, if you're foolish enough (as I was) to try district court. I'm sure the resident naysayers will find ample fodder here, for condemnation.


THE 3 EVENTS

1) My kids, who I haven't seen in 3+ years, live less than half a mile from me.. It was 7:30pm Christmas Day, and I had several gifts that needed to be delivered. I had asked several friends and relatives, and had recieved several affirmations.. but when the time came to do the deed, everyone had their reasons for their inability to comply.

It was my Sovereign Lord and Saviors birthday! Well, I know the law, and I know the legal, and was not about to allow myself to be deterred. As I approached the house ( I never entered the property), suddenly, both my sons came running around the shed. I sat their gifts on the ground just across the property line, told them I loved them very much, wished them a Merry Christmas, and left. My only regret is that I didn't hug them.

About one hour later, the cops arrived and I got the whole thing on audio tape! I handled myself professionally, identified myself as true name, flesh and blood, showed them a variety of papers, explained the law, and the legal... they even had the police chief (an old high school friend) come down, though, he never got out of his car, and only watched from a distance. I was subsequently unlawfully arrested for allegedly violating a protection from abuse order. I was violently restrained (I did not resist, but I am 6'3" 220lbs. and so am automatically presumed to be violent), cuffed, and kidnapped, and spent Christmas night in county jail !

When I bailed out, ($340, signed the bail contract without prejudice, T.D.C.- A.R.R. above my true name), I put together my 'package' and prepared to serve it on all parties... Keep in mind, these are common law docs, and i can serve them myself, which I did.


2) The mother of my kids, works for the demonspawn at Human Services, behind combination locked doors ! Undaunted.. I trotted my little butt over there, and served her at work. The receptionist was very nice, and signed for the docs, and I left. Two hours later, I was arrested for violation of Protection Order, and violation of Bail Conditions, and was again, thrown in the county jail. I was arraigned the next morning, and bailed out (only $250 this time !). Again I signed the bail contract "without prejudice" & "T.D.C.-A.R.R." above my true name..


3) Then, I waited until the first default came due, got the proper docs together, and again, served it on all parties... Once again, I trotted my little butt over to Human Services, and served her at work. This time, I rode over with a friends, and I stayed in the car, while my friend went in and served the Ex. This time, officers came to the house, and gave me two tickets, again alleging violation of Protection Order, and violation of Bail Conditions. I signed them appropriately, and sent them on their way...

When the final default came due... I again rode over in my friends car, and had my friend go in again, and serve the Ex. This time, there were no repercussions. No arrests, no visits from the local PD, not even a phone call.


COURT

Keep in mind... what I filed, was basicly identical paperwork, in all three court cases...

The basic default package AoT,NoDw/OtC,FD,WoP,WoM,PtD with a AoDoCE, most of which I had registered at the county seat.. plus a certified address correction with postal ciites, a certified copy of my tradename registration, and a registered copy of my defaulted cancellatura docs, revoking all allegiences, duties, contracts and signatures, ect..

1) The Christmas Day arrest was withdrawn, the allegations dropped, no court, no arraignment, nothing. as reflected in THIS THREAD.


2) As a rule, I always move things to Superior court. This time, for the sake of experimentation, I regretably kept this one in District Court, where the lowlife judges work. When the case was "roll called" I stood and said, "I am here on this matter", and the DA replied "discussion your Honor"

There was no discussion... no offer was made.. off to trial...

This 'trial' was a joke.. but I had a witness with me. I had been in front of this judge before, and she knew what was coming, so when it went bad from the onset, there was little sense in holding back.. They also brought back the attorney I had stood against, and who had read me the "Mafia speech", threatening me, in my OAS Win thread.

The case was called and I said "special appearence" and was immediately interrupted. They weren't about to let me read my opening dialog, and destroy their presumption of PJ. I was told I would have "my chance" to speak... "Objection ! Presumption ! I am here by special appearence to challenge personam....." I was again interrupted, "Excuse me ! I have the floor!" Again told I was not allowed to speak... not that that stopped me.. every time they looked to me for cooperation, I let em have it, and kept taking back to the beginning.. (staying behind my jurisdictional veil). No PJ, no nexus, court has no standing, lacks essential elements, defaulted aff, failure to state a cause, denial of due process, any decision is null and void ab inito. Everything they did was based on the inital presumption of PJ, which they refused to let me address. I eventually was allowed to speak, but it was long after their presumption had been forcably established. I took this situation right to the limit, and beyond, and threw most everything I knew at them, while I kept repeating the essentials.. and yes, I've ordered a copy of the transcript.

Bottom line? I was cited with contempt, cuffed, and put in the "bad boy box". But I didn't shut up. I was never disruptive, and didn't interrupt, but I definately stood my ground and didn't cooperate. "This is assault, and kidnapping. I will seek remedy !" (the five bailiffs immediately backed off, and got very nervous, my witness got all their names) "He who resorts to violence has already lost !"

Result? no charge of contempt... But they did give the strawman 180 days in jail, all waived, except 7 days for each (2) offense, served concurrently for the charges above.. and the remainder of the 180 spent on 'administrative release' (parole?) Of course, I reminded the court of no standing, ect. refused allocution, and began notify the court of my intent to seek remedy, and demand a stay. The judge, once again, interrupted me and voluntarily stayed the sentence while I appealed.

The court wrote up a contract, with the courts judgement on it, requiring my signature ! (this was a first !) and I was told I had to sign it, which I refused. It lacked my true name, there was no judges signature on it, just a rubber stamp, as well as other errors.. The court wrote "defendant refused to sign" and gave me back a copy. I took the copy home, refused it for cause and fraud, attached an AoT, and had a friend timely send it registered mail to the judge, and am going to default the judge. suffice it to say.. I'm appealing..


3) I demanded "Trial by Jury" (not jury trial), which took this case to superior court, for a "pre-trial" hearing. When the case was "roll called" I stood and said, "I am here on this matter", and the DA replied "disscussion your Honor"

At the break, the DA and I went into a back office, and talked for about 20 minutes. She remained standing, and I sat, with her desk between us. Basicly, the trial took place in her office, and started very slowly. I showed her all my paperwork.. I assured her, I wasn't looking for trouble, or to waste anyones time, but that, over the past 18 months, I had 7 registered unrebutted affidavits, and that that the court, had chronicly been unable to show a nexus, and would they kindly "leave me alone"

We went round and round, as she tried to look for a weakness... She tried to put words in my mouth, make huge leaps in assumption, ect. At one point she said "you mean you're not a person?" "No Maam! the private copywritten Maine Revised Statutes define a 'person' as....." "Well, If you're not a person, what are you?" "haven't your read my paperwork? I'm a flesh and blood man, created by Almighty God ! Why? what are you?" (no comment)

During this time, I learned that for two years, this female DA had worked directly with the female judge, that was responsible for the fiasco immediately above (court visit #2). I was told "You need to stop all this silliness and move on"... I should "drop my appeal" (of #2), and that I had made procedural errors (in the current case #3), and needed to study more. She said the "Ex was not the injured party, but only a "witness" and that serving her, was unnecessary and antagonistic. So I asked who the injured party was, and got the standard "STATE OF MAINE" reply. I asked her if there was evidence of an injured party, as I hadn't recieved any discovery, that I was anxious to read the verified complaint, and that I wanted to cross examine.. (again no comment)
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel

"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight

Last edited by Akira : 07-17-2006 at 06:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-17-2006, 12:53 PM
Akira's Avatar
Akira Akira is offline
Sui Juris Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
con't...

She told me she was going to have a contract written up, saying I agreed to abide by the conditions of the District Courts order ! and would I sign it? I agreed to sign it, as agent, on behalf of the "corporate / legal entity".. I assured her, the "corporate / legal entity" would not go anywhere near my Ex, or my children, and that the "corporate / legal entity" would abide by all decisions of the court, to the best of it's ability. She reiterated, she just wanted my "legal signature", and I said "legal signature? no problem! That's what I signed the tickets, and bail conditions with."

She said she was going to "give the victum advocate a call" and would have the contract written up shortly, and I should step outside and wait, so I went back into the courtroom and waited... for an hour. She finally returned, and ignored me for several more minutes. With a dramatic change in her attitude, she told me "I gave the victum (victum?!?!) a call and have decided we're going to dismiss" and I added "with predjudice". She nodded, and said that I could leave, or "stay and make an appearence". She said she would send a copy, and I asked that it be file stamped.. I gave it some thought and decided I should leave, rather than open a potential "can of worms" by attempting to "appear specially" before the superior court judge, and repeating what happened in district court. If the DA pulled a fast one, and instead, entered the dismissal, without prejudice, I could deal with that..


CONCLUSION

2 wins and one in limbo...

The paperwork in all three senarios is, for all intents and purposes, identical... yet we have three completely different responses, including the completely lawless response by the district court...

We'll see how the R4C/F goes... the order says the sheriff will be notified, but there's not 'date to report', should I have chosen not to appeal. I'm optomistic the appellate court with provide a favorable determination. Since I've never had to appeal, any assistance offered, is appreciated.

Sanctions against the judge (and baliffs) are definately in order... much injury here.. also going to declare all the family matters, and subsequent decisions void for fraud, and default the judges involved directly...

Things are going to get real interesting from here on out..


Lessons?

It's not the "will to win", but the "will to prepare to win"

If you can't defend your documents they are worthless...

Stay the heck out of district court !

Stand your ground and never give up !


So much for "experimenting" with district court !


For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel

"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight

Last edited by Akira- : 05-30-2007 at 08:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-17-2006, 05:05 PM
wargamez102 wargamez102 is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 316
GIT-r-DONE...

Git - r - done...

No copyright infringement intended!

Feed those little pigme children now! (Git-R-Done)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-18-2006, 07:25 AM
ezrhythm ezrhythm is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,067
Send a message via AIM to ezrhythm Send a message via Yahoo to ezrhythm
Congratulations and blessed perseverance!

Sounds like the DA asked if you would sign the "agreement" so that they could call the X and ask her to drop the charges as a way out for them.
Agreements are usually a condition of sentencing which you never came near.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-18-2006, 08:51 AM
Akira's Avatar
Akira Akira is offline
Sui Juris Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
ezrhythm, et al...

Thanks for the support !

When I got to superior court, I had already refused for cause #2's court order. The contract the DA intended to write up, was to bind me contracturally to case #2's decision, and had nothinng to do with case #3. Very strange.. Clearly they're intimidated... I seriously doubt the DA insisted I "move on" and "drop the appeal" because she was 'concerned for my welfare'.. lol

Both the DA and the judge knew what was coming. I had had a hearing, on another matter, before the same judge in case #2, several months earlier, in a full court room, where I had a slam dunk (much to her surprise). She's a very strong woman, and I know I caught her off guard, but I think I may have embarassed her, also. Perhaps this was her opportunity for revenge?

I had also been told by several cops, and two DA secretaries, that the DA in #2 (also from the OAS Win) had left the area shortly after my OAS Win. I was quite shocked to see him in court that day. Perhaps he was brought back, just to help put me in my place?

I still don't understand the 'victum' remark, it may have just been a convenient excuse. The DA made it very clear, the Ex was a witness and not the victum. Then the DA says she's going to call the victums advocate (I presume the Ex's). Still later, she says she called the 'victum'. Who? the STATE OF MAINE? lol

Procedurally, even if the Ex had wanted the charges dropped, the state wouldn't have done it.

Despite the blemish of #2, I am still delighted with my progress. I have tried to keep the process simple, and the paperwork to a minimum. There are still several things that can be done to strengthen it.

To date, my stance has been strictly defensive. The state has defaulted 7 for 7, and I have won 6 of 7, with one still pending. That makes for one heck of a paper trail, and foundation from which to launch an offensive.


For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel

"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:02 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer