
09-10-2004, 05:54 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 591
|
|
|
Taxbusters Sued
<font color=darkblue face=tahoma>I agree completely with iamfreeru2.
In this situation I would basically challenge the juristiction/authority of the US Attorney to even talk to me. Perhaps an affidavit of non-corporate status, definitively removing self from the jurisdiction of the US Attorney and the codes he enforces.
I've also become very interested in Pleas in Abatement.
-BT[/color]
__________________
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." --Dresden James
|

09-10-2004, 07:31 PM
|
|
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 138
|
|
|
Taxbusters Sued
I agree that the Abatement is the way to go for most offers from these people, i.e. IRS, DOJ, and others.
check out http://usa-the-republic.com/abatements/Abate_0.html
There is some examples there and how the abatement works. Good stuff
|

09-10-2004, 07:38 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 591
|
|
|
Taxbusters Sued
<font color=darkblue face=tahoma>What experience have you had with them, leatherlips?
-BT[/color]
__________________
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." --Dresden James
|

09-10-2004, 07:45 PM
|
|
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 138
|
|
|
Taxbusters Sued
None yet, but I have used the nom deguerre with success. This seems to go beyound the nom deguerre and explains the nom deguerre in it. I will use it the next time I get a chance
|

09-10-2004, 08:09 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 591
|
|
|
Taxbusters Sued
<font color=darkblue face=tahoma>I've got one ready to send right now, so i will let you know how THAT goes.
If anyone is interested in taking a look at it, just send me a message.
-BT[/color]
__________________
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." --Dresden James
|

09-10-2004, 09:15 PM
|
|
|
|
Taxbusters Sued
leatherlips,
Would you expand a bit on how you used the nom de guerre to succeed? Perhaps a bit of background, context, etc. if not too much to ask.
Thanks.
|

09-10-2004, 09:24 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 591
|
|
|
Taxbusters Sued
<font color=darkblue face=tahoma>A nom de guerre (name of war) is specific evidence of the existence of a fictitious persona.
Arguing jurisdiction is a fait accompli and utterly irrelevant when one has already answered as surety for a persona.
There is no allowance in the Federal Constitution, nor in the Constitutions of the several states which authorize the use or recognize the existence of nom de guerres and as such they are a persona non grata
-BT[/color]
__________________
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." --Dresden James
|

09-11-2004, 07:25 PM
|
|
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 138
|
|
|
Taxbusters Sued
Look under mail stratagies. I tell the nom deguerre process there. I was getting letters from the State tax department wanting money they said I owed and I declaired them a fiction in my last letter to them and I have sent every letter they sent me since back unopened with the nom deguerre and I haven't heard from them for over two months now.
|

09-12-2004, 09:40 AM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 723
|
|
|
Taxbusters Sued
Going two months without hearing from a state taxing agency isn't long enough to determine anything. If you go 6 without a word, then they might be leaving you alone.
[b]Interesting how the US claims to be the damaged party. If they are party to the action, then how can they be the prosecutor also?</b?
|

09-12-2004, 12:23 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 591
|
|
|
Taxbusters Sued
<font color=darkblue face=tahoma>Agreed.
2 months could just be a reloading interval
-BT[/color]
__________________
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." --Dresden James
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:14 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|