Another US Citizen Tax Protestor Bites The Dust !

[weishaupt1776]

Hooded, to level the playing field, shouldn't you post your contact address for the agencies to see, so that they may contact you also ??

I respect people's personal privacy, and if they haven't done me wrong; then there is no need for me or anyone else to contact them

As an American I have a duty (express &/or implied) to respect their God given right to privacy (as outlined in the 4th Amdmt)

Anyway

The new
Red Amendment (click) is out

[joseph sugarman]

Codee,

Thank you for your response. I cannot fathom its meaning. But the whole bruhaha is of little consequence, anyway. Thank you again.

Joseph Sugarman, design@dream-home.com

[Shoonra]

Going back to the news item that started this thread, Charles Conces is a longtime tax dodger. The pending court cases against him is a civil suit, not a criminal prosecution, so there won't be a conviction.

Back on April 24, 2006, the court entered a judgment against Conces, the defendant, and granted the govt the injunction against Conces peddling his tax dodging advice and to show his customer list to the govt. US v. Conces (WD Mich 4/24/06) 97 AFTR2d 2192, 2006 US Tax Cases para 50324.

So Conces has violated a court order. A contempt citation is entirely justified under the circumstances. The court's next step may be locking Conces up to encourage his compliance.

[Sharona]

Originally Posted by weishaupt1776

You can attempt to try it yourself and be pennywise & a pound foolish by greasing your ego while thinking you can do it by yourself

OR

you can have someone who has been studying the ins and out of this stuff for over 10 years show you how to do it

That would be great! How much longer do you think it will be before I get my pacinlaw "Red Amendment" report I ordered back in early January? Still hasn't arrived yet...

-- Sharona

[hooded50]

Originally Posted by Codee

So you publish personal contact info as part of a vendetta against those you deem to be nuisances. Well oh mighty judge that is why you are an irresponsible A$$hole.

Codee, I have no vendetta against you. I've never published any contact information concerning you. I'm just saying you shouldn't run your mouth so much. I don't publish information concerning anyone as a "vendetta". I publish information of people who are damaging other people with no legitimate purpose.

That is why I published the judge and attorney's address. They need to hear from the public that they are out of line. If they refuse to correct their actions, then "we the people", who are the true sovereigns and the true government, have a right to take their assets from them as security for damages, the exact same way they try to do to us. Judges seem to love "equality of the law" until they become subject to it. Then it becomes a completely different story.

So many judges hide behind their "office". They issue rulings that are out of touch with the law, and many times, with reality itself. They have a myriad of people that they use to handle their affairs and to discourage or "head off" anyone who tries to challenge them. Well, if you're trying to steal MY assets, you WILL pay a price, be ye Serf or Pope.

I don't even have a vendetta against the judges and lawyers I've challenged. I am simply professional, but firm. I leave no room for interpretation or games.

[hooded50]

Originally Posted by weishaupt1776

Hooded, to level the playing field, shouldn't you post your contact address for the agencies to see, so that they may contact you also ??

I respect people's personal privacy, and if they haven't done me wrong; then there is no need for me or anyone else to contact them

As an American I have a duty (express &/or implied) to respect their God given right to privacy (as outlined in the 4th Amdmt)

Anyway

The new
Red Amendment (click) is out

Weis, I generally agree. I respect other people's right to privacy, as well as guarding my own jealously.

However, when someone is committing fraud, then he loses his privacy. He became a "PUBLIC" official when he took office. He knew the consequences of being such a "PUBLIC" official when he signed on the dotted line. No one forced him. He chose to take the office voluntarily.

He has no one to blame but himself.

[Sharona]

Originally Posted by Smith

They did the same thing to taxgate

All they where doing was reading and exploring the law and how it worked .

Same for the lawman group .

necessity knows no law , it is done this way to keep the rest of us in line .

Yesah, we are all of us supposed to be the stupid, blind, dumb sheeple.

I have started signing "without prejudice" after my sig on government documents (tax filings), will this red-flag me? Or paint a bulls-eye on my back?

[swiftknight23]

If LB Bork is actually charging people for this information, then it would seem equally, that LB Bork falls in the same category of what you call "PAY-tr-idiots".

If there is no proof of his success (success in other than taking peoples money[frns] for an un-proven claim, then anyone purchasing his material would be the idiot.

Originally Posted by weishaupt1776

I have signed a non-disclosure agreement not to share the docs

THis is not for any pecuniary interests of the one who drafted them

it's that the paperwork is customized based on a questionairre per person, so if you attempt to boilerplate my stuff, - there could be something omitted for you, etc ..

Also, if this stuff gets distributed freely, it will get in the hands (as it already has) of some PAY-tr-idiots
who try to add their own UCC crap to it, or something equally as ineffective.

Or it will get in the hands of some idiot who doesn't want to study in order to more intelligently defend the docs

The ultimate result would be BAD PRECEDENTS being set in the courts

Anyway, LB Bork at pacinlaw.org is the main man behind this.
Attached is a doc called Nationality Premise which outlines the NAtionality Correction process

You can attempt to try it yourself and be pennywise & a pound foolish by greasing your ego while thinking you can do it by yourself

OR

you can have someone who has been studying the ins and out of this stuff for over 10 years show you how to do it

[weishaupt1776]

Originally Posted by swiftknight23

If LB Bork is actually charging people for this information, then it would seem equally, that LB Bork falls in the same category of what you call "PAY-tr-idiots".

If there is no proof of his success (success in other than taking peoples money[frns] for an un-proven claim, then anyone purchasing his material would be the idiot.

Well, So far

A. I got a No DL dismissed here in Sunny Flor--ee--da
B. 2 guys in New Hampshire are listed as "New Hampshire Nationals" in the cops' database
C. An Ohio National got a corporate gig w/no SSN or W-4 becasue the atty advised HR that they could be hit with a discrimination lawsuit
D. A lady in Wisconsin was personally visited by the Atty Gen to discuss the paperwork

Anyway, once you read the Red Amendment, you will understand the deal as i was playing it way close to the vest before then

Anyway, this process is not about ducking out the STATE

it's about an unlawful body politic composed of "U.S Citizens" when it is really lawfully supposed to be of DeJure State nationals

I am glad I paid for the process and I worked my ass off to get it and to preserve it

Until then . . .

P.S.
They aren't going to hand anyone a "Congratulations, you figured it all out certificate", either

Some people just have a more well thought out plan than others

[Codee]

Originally Posted by hooded50

I don't publish information concerning anyone as a "vendetta". I publish information of people who are damaging other people with no legitimate purpose.

That is why I published the judge and attorney's address.

I dont give a rats ass how much you think I should run my mouth.

I don't give a **** about you finding out my personal info. I wont help you out but ****... My phone number is 916-386-1431 Call your heart out buddy. I strongly recomend however not "stopping by" as my bro and I are alittle on edge about visitors.

As to you publishing about a judge because he committed a "FRAUD" that is your opinion. However when you start PUNISHING those YOU see as wrong you become an ASS.

If you have a valid claim and can prove that there was a fraud THEN SUE THE BASTARDS."

Otherwise you are saying there is no law and that suing makes no sense because there is no law left.

Well if there ain't no more law then who are you to claim someone committed fraud. Further who cares because there is no more law.

If you want to publish his personal info because you think the man is a **** suckin' whore who deserves a rash of **** for just being a ****,,, well I can agree with that.

I just don't like false pretences.