should I fill out a w-4

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Dillon Hunt

Your boss will not pay any fines if he requested the info and you did not provide it...

You are correct. That is why I used to suggest writing Refusal for Cause on the W-4 Form and getting confirmation you returned it to Payroll. Now your employer has proof he requested you to Withhold your pay. He can show that to an IRS agent and face the consequences of royally pissing him or her off!

All for the privilege of having some new guy teaching everybody about law there. Wow! Imagine how much profit they are getting out of this new guy, and he is still on probation!


Regards,

David Merrill.

[RICKO]

[Qoute: Palani]That might be a good reason .. fitting in, keeping a low profile, going along for the sake of the security of loved ones. I might question whether greater security might be achieved by not taking the the 'easy' route.[Qoute: Palani]

Highly unlikely my friend. Have you seen the results of the majority.

[David Merrill]

For the most part, all the arguments out there are based in law; not private agreement/contract. They all fail therefore - because the courts support the Constitutional provision that no state can interfere with obligations of contract.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[fulltitle]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

For the most part, all the arguments out there are based in law; not private agreement/contract. They all fail therefore - because the courts support the Constitutional provision that no state can interfere with obligations of contract....

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Much like an NFL player might fail by arguing the NFL rules to be unconstitutional? Whether IRS/taxpayer, or NFL/player perhaps its not necessarily relevant whether United States Internal Revenue Code is "constitutional", "positive law", "space law" or Murphy's law: in their court they are going to presume willing, knowing, knowledgable and learn'ed engagement in contractual agreement.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by fulltitle

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Much like an NFL player might fail by arguing the NFL rules to be unconstitutional? Whether IRS/taxpayer, or NFL/player perhaps its not necessarily relevant whether United States Internal Revenue Code is "constitutional", "positive law", "space law" or Murphy's law: in their court they are going to presume willing, knowing, knowledgable and learn'ed engagement in contractual agreement.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...blic_money.jpg

Yes indeed. This suitor got two years back and formed the affidavit of truth as he was beginning to use the rubber non-endorsement stamp. He showed bad faith in the presumption he was willingly and intentionally endorsing private credit for the bankers to fractionalize upon.

This is the Achilles' Heel folks. Almost everybody around you would have chosen to redeem FRNs in lawful money starting at the very first penny they ever earned in life.

Pro 11:1 A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight.

That is the very distinction between lawful money and FRNs (unlawful money) - you must participate in the institutionalized criminal syndicalism of fractional lending and a plastic money supply to color all the counterfeiting legal. If we are all criminals like the banksters, they will get away with stealing your substance.

Look for yourselves at the attachments. "...furnish an elastic currency..."



Regards,

David Merrill.



P.S. I just realized that attachment "15" there answers the question that came up about redeeming FRNs in lawful money at "any Federal Reserve Bank". That includes any corner bank you will find in America!