This Years 1040 Form Invalid

[weishaupt1776]

Originally Posted by mrg

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/librar....TREASURY.html

I think they were given some sort of "extension" though.




8 USC 1101 (a)(2)??

WHOOOOOPS !!!
8 USC 1481 (a)(2)

my bad

although 1101 (a)(2) most certainly ties in !

[mrg]

Posted by Weisshaupt

WHOOOOOPS !!!
8 USC 1481 (a)(2)

my bad

although 1101 (a)(2) most certainly ties in!

TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part III > § 1481

§ 1481. Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary action; burden of proof; presumption

(a) A person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing any of the following acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality—

(1) obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon his own application or upon an application filed by a duly authorized agent, after having attained the age of eighteen years; or

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...1----000-.html

More likely § 1101 (a)(3) would tie in?

Or both (a)(2) and (a)(3)?

But (a)(3) seems obvious standing alone, and (a)(2) might need an example in context?

If so, it would be interesting, and appreciated to see how this section ties in.

TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER I >

§ 1101. Definitions

(a) As used in this chapter—

(1) The term “administrator” means the official designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 1104 (b) of this title.

(2) The term “advocates” includes, but is not limited to, advises, recommends, furthers by overt act, and admits belief in.

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/h...1----000-.html

[weishaupt1776]

DUH !! I meant (a)(3) not (a)(2)

Thanks

[mrg]

My pleasure.

I learned from it.

Thanks for posting it.

[Shoonra]

The message that started this thread based its claim that the OMB number for the 1040 Form (1545-0074) expired on Dec. 31, 2006 used as its evidence a link to a list on the OMB website. The list of approved forms on the OMB website is undated but viewing the source code reveals that it was last posted in August 2006. The IRS announced the renewal of that OMB number, and a great many other OMB numbers for other forms, in the Federal Register for Dec. 20, 2006 (vol 71) starting on page 76427.
The announcement is signed by Robert Dahl, the Treasury's Paperwork Reduction Act Officer. In other words, the same OMB number for the 1040 was renewed and is still current.

I checked Lexis and found well over a hundred cases (more like 150) in which the defendant tried to argue about the 1040's OMB number. In not even a single case did this argument win.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

I checked Lexis and found well over a hundred cases (more like 150) in which the defendant tried to argue about the 1040's OMB number. In not even a single case did this argument win.

That particular slant of the PRA argument will always fail.

However, in a criminal prosecution, bringing up the PRA# will bring about a dismissal because the OMB# lacks authority. In other words the civil suits are voluntary in the same nature of private agreement as voluntary compliance. However, the authority for a criminal prosecution is usurped from Title 27 under the presumption the taxpayer is involved in BATF activity.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Shoonra]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

However, in a criminal prosecution, bringing up the PRA# will bring about a dismissal because the OMB# lacks authority.

Wrong, but some people insist on learning things the hard way.

[FreeFromContract]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

Wrong, but some people insist on learning things the hard way.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

Wrong, but some people insist on learning things the hard way.

This was the reason for the Lawrence Dismissal. The DoJ came back a few weeks later and said that they miscalculated the amount of owed taxes for the grand jury - but that doesn't matter when the alleged crime if failure to file. All that matters is that he was required to file.

Here is the heart of the matter. All revenue causes are admiralty in nature.

http://usa-the-republic.com/items%20...%20Exposed.pdf

And Federal Reserve Notes are like insurance claims waiting for redemption. Much like the predecessor bottomry.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Friendsplacect]

Here is the heart of the matter. All revenue causes are admiralty in nature.

Thank You David! For providing me with a day of quality reading!