Quote:
|
Originally Posted by joseph sugarman
Dear Rottweiler,
You are wrong again. At the end of the Kuglin, criminal trial the government asked the judge to order Kuglin to file and pay. The judges response to the government attornies was to the effect he, the judge, did not work for the IRS.
|
Here's an exert about Kuglin's case from Tax Protester Dossiers. Vernice B. Kuglin faced criminal charges for falsifying Forms W-4 and failing to pay taxes on $920,000 of income between 1996 and 2001, but was acquitted by a federal jury. United States v. Kuglin, No. 03-20111
(U.S.D.C. W.D. Tenn. 8/8/2003. According to newspaper accounts of the trial, jurors found persuasive the defendant's argument that she attempted to obtain an explanation of the Service's authority to collect taxes from her but her correspondence went unanswered. See 2003 TNT 155-12 (Aug. 11, 2003); 2003 TNT 155-13 (AUG. 11,2003); 2003 TNT 158-2 (Aug. 14, 2003).
In the case of Ms. Kuglin, we also know that she did not escape civil liability for the taxes because she was later interviewed on a radio program and admitted that the IRS had garnished her salary to pay the taxes she owed. "American Radio" with Dave Champion (1/31/2004). Eight month's later, she entered into a settlement with the IRS in Tax Court in which she agreed to pay more than a half million dollars in back taxes and penalties. Kuglin v. Commissioner, No. 21743-03, 2004 TNT 177-14 (T.C. 9/1/2004).
The income tax is perfectly constitutional it's just the way the iRS enforces it is what make's it unconstitutional
The charge is willful failure to file.
