Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mrg
http://www.rense.com/general77/cease.htm
Can you substantively, straightforwardly, forthrightly, impartially, and with honesty and integrity, rebut point by point in order presented each point in the document found at the above link?
|
Most of these points have been discussed back and forth on other threads over the last year or so (during my membership) and I really resent having to plow that ground again.
Mitchell is writing to the US Marshal in NH, claiming to be handling an unidentified case in the 10th Circuit (the Colorado-Kansas etc region), apparently on appeal which means his side already lost the first round. This gives him, at best, zero authority and zero credibility.
The authentic and official status of the IRS as a subdivision of the US Treasury is not only obvious but has been upheld in court.
The constitutionality of the income tax law, ditto.
If you want to believe Mitchell, I suggest you wait and see how effective his letter to a federal marshal in New Hampshire is. The marshal's job, incidentally, is to enforce the orders of the federal court, and in the course of doing so he is given judicial immunity; he does not take orders from non-lawyers who have nothing to do with the court judgment at hand.
