Taxation Discuss Taxation (IRS, Real Estate Taxes, Car Taxes, etc.).


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Taxation
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:43 AM
Truth-Bringer's Avatar
Truth-Bringer Truth-Bringer is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 62
Judge Orders Michigan Couple To Testify Against Themselves

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Judge Orders Michigan Couple To Testify Against Themselves

On February 26, 2007 and again on May 2, in Michigan’s Eastern District Court, a team of U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Attorneys and Federal District Court Judge Nancy G. Edmunds ordered Peter and Doreen Hendrickson to testify against themselves.


Judge Edmunds granted the DOJ summary judgment in a lawsuit filed to force the Hendricksons to change sworn testimony on their tax returns in order to give the federal government a pretext for claiming the couple owed income taxes in 2002 and 2003.


The Hendricksons point out that ordering or forcing someone to change sworn testimony is a crime and contrary to the US Constitution, even when a judge orders it.



Judge Edmunds issued her ruling without the formality of a trial.


Official Treasury Department Certificates of Assessment show the Hendricksons owe no taxes for the years in question. Nowhere in the complaint does the DOJ present evidence that the Hendricksons owe anything or that their testimony is false.

The Hendricksons are taking the matter to a higher court.


The DOJ has tried and failed in three previous lawsuits to suppress Peter Hendrickson’s book, 'Cracking the Code- the Fascinating Truth about Taxation in America'. The DOJ’s efforts to silence Mr. Hendrickson appear to result from its fear of what he reveals in that book.


'Cracking the Code-...' shows that the application of the income tax is far more limited than most Americans believe. It demonstrates how key terms in the code such as “wages,” “employer,” “employee,” “trade or business” and “self-employment” are explicitly defined in the law in order to limit the income tax to certain federally privileged activities. Earnings unconnected with such privileged activities are not subject to the tax. Unaware of these special definitions, most Americans give the words their common meaning and mistakenly pay taxes they do not owe.


Mr. Hendrickson points out that, "The limited nature of the tax is not a matter of my opinion. In addition to the clear words of the law, dozens of United States Supreme Court rulings agree with my research and analysis, while no Supreme Court rulings support any alternative view, including the broad misunderstanding of the law the IRS likes to encourage."


The IRS appears, at best, "conflicted". Even while presenting a disparaging (but carefully inaccurate) summary of 'Cracking the Code-...' on its web site, the IRS continues to send full refunds-- Social Security and Medicare ‘contributions’ included-- to all who file accurate returns based on what they learn by reading the book. Hendrickson’s web site, www.losthorizons.com, shows copies of refund checks, credits and corrected account statements amounting to over $2.2 million received by his readers since the book was first published in 2003. This amount, which the IRS says is a mere fraction of what it has returned to readers of Hendrickson’s book so far, continues to grow every week.


While the DOJ and Judge Edmunds work to suppress Hendrickson’s book, and the IRS floods the media with disinformation and fear, the hard evidence-- the words of the law, dozens of Supreme Court rulings, and the ongoing stream of complete refunds-- remains on the side of the liberating revelations in 'Cracking the Code- the Fascinating Truth about Taxation in America'.

CONTACT: Peter Hendrickson

E-mail: phendrickson@losthorizons.com

www.losthorizons.com
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer

"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action, according to our will, within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others." - Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by Truth-Bringer : 07-07-2007 at 05:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:45 AM
Truth-Bringer's Avatar
Truth-Bringer Truth-Bringer is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 62
Can one of the mods fix the title please? First word should be "Judge"

Thanks
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer

"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action, according to our will, within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others." - Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:55 AM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
You can edit it yourself. Go to edit, then click "Go Advanced"; you can edit it from there.
If you need further assistance, let me know.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:58 AM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Thanks for the info and link, Truth-Bringer.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-07-2007, 05:56 PM
Truth-Bringer's Avatar
Truth-Bringer Truth-Bringer is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlesa6
You can edit it yourself. Go to edit, then click "Go Advanced"; you can edit it from there.
If you need further assistance, let me know.

Ok, thanks.

Well, I did it, but it's still showing up as "udge" on the main screen
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer

"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action, according to our will, within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others." - Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by Truth-Bringer : 07-07-2007 at 05:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-08-2007, 09:41 AM
PANICPASS PANICPASS is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 717
Quote:
The Hendricksons point out that ordering or forcing someone to change sworn testimony is a crime and contrary to the US Constitution, even when a judge orders it.

The appeals court is not going to agree with that because, if they did, everyone would start filing 0 returns, even corporations. IRS changes sworn testimony everyday when someone files a tax return they don't agree with IRS issues a Notice of Deficiency. Isn't issuing a Notice of Deficiency changing someone's swore testimony?

Last edited by PANICPASS : 07-08-2007 at 09:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-08-2007, 12:25 PM
Shoonra Shoonra is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,745
No, essentially the Hendricksons were told NOT to perjure themselves, and to undo the perjury of their previous tax returns which contained false figures.

The pretense that the Fifth Amendment somehow excuses people from paying taxes was rejected by the Supreme Court long ago.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-08-2007, 08:37 PM
Truth-Bringer's Avatar
Truth-Bringer Truth-Bringer is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
No, essentially the Hendricksons were told NOT to perjure themselves, and to undo the perjury of their previous tax returns which contained false figures.

According to who? People who profit from the tax? Well that's a shocker. Nope, no conflict of interest at all there...

Quote:
The pretense that the Fifth Amendment somehow excuses people from paying taxes was rejected by the Supreme Court long ago.

That's not their pretense.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer

"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action, according to our will, within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others." - Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-08-2007, 11:38 PM
Notorial dissent Notorial dissent is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth-Bringer
According to who? People who profit from the tax? Well that's a shocker. Nope, no conflict of interest at all there...

According to people who actually read the law and know what it says and means.



That's not their pretense.
No, their pretense is that the tax laws don’t apply to them and don’t mean what they say. They are wrong on both counts.

Pete was told in court, that his filing was frivolous, and therefore a nullity, it did not exist as a valid record. It was shown in court that he had actually received taxable income and they were ordered to refile, and file correctly based on the court finding. He was told that his interpretation of the IRS code was incorrect, and that he had the option of either filing correctly, or being charged with perjury and found in contempt. That’s about as simple as it gets.

Pete is going to lose on appeal for the simple fact that his appeal is even more poorly written than his book, and full of even bigger holes.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-09-2007, 10:04 AM
Truth-Bringer's Avatar
Truth-Bringer Truth-Bringer is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notorial dissent
No, their pretense is that the tax laws don’t apply to them and don’t mean what they say. They are wrong on both counts.

Actually, they're right on both counts. But you have to weed through the insane complexity of the tax code to find the truth. That's the reason it was made so insanely complex - to hide the truth. The truth is that we're all being falsely classified as federal employees for the purpose of the tax. The IRS is keeping secret files on everyone which uphold this classification (as well as listing everyone who has ever filed an income tax return as a resident of the Virgin Islands), and using those in court. If you don't rebut that information prior to going into court, you lose based on that deception:

"Government prevails in challenge to individual’s appeals hearing in which master file transcripts were considered at hearing instead of tax returns."
- Stanifird v. Wilcox et al. 87 AFTR2d Par. 2001-1058 June 12, 2001.


You have to go back to the first income tax to understand the current deception:

"First Income Tax Act Revealing

Some government documents I obtained in 1994 shows that the first income tax of 1861 had to have certain sections amended, specifically section 210 of the first Income Tax Act This was due to the fact Lincoln wanted to tax the people and those living were incensed that what they fought for in 1776 was again about to be placed on the people. So the second income tax act removed the people and only taxed government employees for the privilege of working for government from which the Treasury paid them.

For this they needed to pay a kick back or a return of money for that privilege. Frank Kowalik stated this in his book IRS Humbug, and this is the proof to support his book. All my research has proven this to be so in my books and other writings. Rather than go into explanation, which you will draw from the following, I let you come to your own conclusions. I will put in bold what I think you need to dwell on and hopefully some myths will be dispelled.

This takes careful reading to understand. The pages following, were the results of the clerks of the Postmaster asking why they were paying a tax when the clerks of the IRS were not. Now remember the "clerks" are today's IRS agents, revenuers, and the like. So the Postmaster drafted a letter to find out why his people were paying taxes and certain IRS people were not. In the case of Diversified Metals the Justice Department admitted on the record that IRS employees are NOT U.S. Government employees. The following proves it beyond any shadow of doubt. Now you might ask why did I not bring this out before? I have but only two people that asked. There was no need to as most people are readers and not doers. I only gave it to doers. Now I decided to let it out and see how many people are doers. By that I mean take this and use it. There is so much info here that it boggles the mind. You will learn why it is called an "internal tax", why only no others are mentioned in section 165 to have the income tax collected from and why mechanics and laborers were not taxed. You will also see that when IRS employees did not pay the tax , neither did any American not working for government.
39th Congress---2d Session---Ex. Doc. No. 99
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SALARY TAX UPON CLERKS TO POSTMASTERS

Letter from the Secretary of Treasury


IN ANSWER TO

A resolution of the House of the 12th of February, relative to salary tax upon clerks to postmasters, with the regulations of the department, & c.

February 20, 1867.--Referred to the Committee of Ways and Means and ordered to be Printed

TREASURY DEPARTMENT February 15, 1867

Sir: The Secretary of the Treasury has the honor to acknowledge the receipt of the following resolution of the House of Representatives, viz: "February 12, 1867.

"Resolved, That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and is hereby, requested to inform this house whether the various postmasters throughout the United States are required to account for and pay a salary tax upon the salaries of clerks employed by them where such salary is not fixed by law, but is paid out of funds furnished by the government; also, that he be requested to furnish a copy of the regulations and circulars of said department, if any such exist, requiring such payment; also, whether any such tax is collected or required to be accounted for from clerks of assessors of internal revenue, and, if any discrimination is made between said two classes of clerks in respect to said tax, why such discrimination is made.

In obedience thereto he has the honor to submit the following report:

Postmasters' clerks are appointed by postmasters, and take the oaths of office prescribed in the 2d section of the act of July 2,1862, and in the 2d section of March 3, 1863.

Their salaries are not fixed in amount by law, but from time to time the Postmaster General fixes the amount allotted to each postmaster for clerk hire, under the authority conferred upon him by the ninth section of the act of June 5, 1836, and then the postmaster , as an agent for and in behalf of the United States, determines the salary to be paid to each of his clerks. These salaries are paid by the postmasters, acting as disbursing agents, from United States moneys advanced to them for this purpose, either directly from the Post Office Department in pursuance of appropriations made by law, or from the accruing revenues of their offices, under the instructions of the Post Master General.

SALARY TAX UPON CLERK TO POSTMASTER

The receipts of such clerks constitute vouchers in the accounts of the postmaster acting as disbursing agents and in the settlements made with them by the Sixth Auditor. In all the foregoing transactions the postmaster acts not as a principal, but as an agent of the United States, and the clerks are not in his private employment, but in the public employment of the United States. Such being the facts, these clerks are subjected to and required to account for and pay the salary tax, imposed by the one hundred and twenty-third section of the internal revenue act of June 30, 1864, as amended by the ninth section of the internal revenue act of July 13, 1866, upon payments for services to persons in the civil employment or service of the United States.

Copies of the regulations under which such salary taxes are withheld and paid into the treasury to the credit of internal revenue collection account are herewith transmitted, marked A, B, and C. Clerks to assessors of internal revenue are appointed by the assessors. Neither law nor regulations require them to take an oath of office, because, as the law at present stands, they are not in the public service of the United States, through the agency of the assessor, but are in the private personal service of the assessor, as a principal, who employs them.

The salaries of such clerks are neither fixed in amount by law, nor are they regulated by any officer of the Treasury Department, except by the assessors by whom they are employed.

The only control exercised by the Treasury Department over the clerk hire of assessors is to prescribe a necessary and reasonable amount which shall not be exceeded in reimbursing the assessors for this item of their expenses.

No money is advanced by the United States for the payment of such salaries, nor do the assessors perform the duties of disbursing agents of the United States in paying their clerks. The entire amount allowed is paid directly to the assessor, and he is not accountable to the United States for its payment to his clerks, for the reason that he has paid them in advance, out of his own funds, and this is a reimbursement to him of such amount as the department decides to be reasonable. No salary tax is therefore collected, or required by the Treasury Department to be accounted for, or paid, on account of payments to assessors clerks, as the United States pays no such clerks nor has them in its employ or service, and they do not come within the provisions of existing laws imposing such a tax.

Perhaps no better illustration of the difference between the status of Postmasters' clerks and that of assessors' clerks can be given than the following: A postmaster became a defaulter, without paying his clerks; his successor received from the Postmaster General a new remittance for paying them; and if, at any time, the clerks in a post office do not receive their salaries, by reason of the death, resignation or removal of a postmaster, the new appointee authorized by the regulations of the Post Office Department to pay them out of the proceeds of the office; and should there be no funds in his hands belonging to the department, a draft is issued to place money in his hands for that purpose. If an assessor had not paid his clerks, they would have no legal claim the treasury for their salaries. A discrimination is made between postmasters' clerks and assessors' clerks to the extent and for the reasons hereinbefore set forth.

I have the honor to be, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

H. McCULLOCH, Secretary of the treasury

continued on the next page:
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer

"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action, according to our will, within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others." - Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by Truth-Bringer : 07-09-2007 at 10:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Orleans judge orders 42 freed Archibald 'Harry' Tuttle Office of Information Retrieval 1 03-31-2007 07:27 AM
Judge: Girl, 9, competent to testify Archibald 'Harry' Tuttle Office of Information Retrieval 0 10-14-2006 10:59 AM
Judge orders U.S. to let 15 Cubans return Archibald 'Harry' Tuttle Office of Information Retrieval 0 03-01-2006 12:43 PM
Judge orders NSA spy papers released Archibald 'Harry' Tuttle Office of Information Retrieval 1 02-17-2006 06:54 AM
Judge orders dad to choose law over God juststartingout Misc. Discussion 3 04-15-2005 02:01 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:24 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer