03-30-2008, 12:55 AM
|
|
|
|
sedm and famguardian need to be on the FIRST PAGE, not this one. highly recommended
|
03-30-2008, 02:55 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 711
|
|
|
the part you forgot
Why is it that you tax protesters always ignore section 7701 of title 26, aka the Internal Revenue Code?
It states, in relevant part:
Quote:
26 USC § 7701. Definitions
Subtitle F - Procedure and Administration
(c) Includes and including
The terms "includes" and "including" when used in a definition contained in this title shall not be deemed to exclude other things otherwise within the meaning of the term defined.
|
In other words, "includes" and "including" when used in title 26 are terms of expansion, not terms of limitation. The purpose of the part you quoted is to make it clear that people who work for the government are also liable for taxes, not just people who work for private enterprise.
Next silly assertion?
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|
03-30-2008, 03:56 PM
|
 |
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 302
|
|
|
Doc to study...
I have a 1288 page manual, but it is 4.5 MB .. too big to attach. If anyone wants a copy PM me with an e-mail addy.
..J
__________________
Déjà vu in the iconography of our world is a warning of danger, a glitch in the Matrix. Something has changed.
|
03-30-2008, 05:31 PM
|
|
|
|
If "includes" is expansive, then why is it necessary for the words "but not limited to" to be added to "includes" many times thought the title?
Would that not make "includes" void for vagueness?
By adding "but not limited to" does that show there would be times when includes IS limiting? There is no reason to have "but not limited to" unless it is needed. Then why have it sometimes but not other times?
|
03-30-2008, 08:02 PM
|
 |
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: a state of Liberty
Posts: 15
|
|
|
Can one really generate income from running a public office?
Would that be a conflict of interest since public officials are being paid income by the Federal Reserve?
Is the Federal Reserve a governmental agency ?
Would that be operating for a profit?
Or operating against a prophet?
Is the government a Federal Reserve Agent?
Or are agents of the Federal Reserve in Government?
Title 12, Section 411 :
Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized.
|
03-30-2008, 08:13 PM
|
 |
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1
|
|
|
facts are stubborn things
May I suggest a reading of the following:
http://www.atgpress.com/inform/gov044.htm
This paper leaves little doubt as to the proper meanings of the "terms" used in the tax code. Clever how they want to interchange "terms" with "words" to confuse the matter. |
03-30-2008, 08:27 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,152
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DanielJacob
May I suggest a reading of the following:
http://www.atgpress.com/inform/gov044.htm
This paper leaves little doubt as to the proper meanings of the "terms" used in the tax code. Clever how they want to interchange "terms" with "words" to confuse the matter. |
Words of ART
Check out the 'legal' definition of the term "words of art" and pay specific attention to the fact that a synonym of the term is "jargon", then check out the definition of the term "jargon"
Jerry Carlos |
03-30-2008, 08:43 PM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 676
|
|
|
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
|
03-30-2008, 08:52 PM
|
|
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: a state of Liberty
Posts: 15
|
|
|
"Words of Art" Blacks Law 4th
I took up the idea.... Good call there!
Words of Art. The vocabulary or terminology of a particular art or science, and especially those expressions which are idiomatic or peculiar to it. See Cargill v. Thompson, 57 Minn. 534, 59 N.W. 638. ~Black's Law 4th,
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:42 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|
