Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aksis
David,
I remember you talking about having the Postal Clerk roundating items for various reasons... kind of.
Is this part of the reasons you have the Postal Clerk roundate stamp over the regular stamp?
I don't have a meter machine.
Much Love,
Christopher Theodore: Rhodes
|
There is a lot of UN procedures going on with the UPU (Universal Postal Union) that may or may not be myth. I just read on another thread that the Fox $1 stamp has a special bond number that can only be read by specialized Postal Service branches and if you figure it out you can redeem the stamp in gold or silver!
Quote:
http://ecclesia.org/forum/topic.asp?...30&whichpage=3
This particular stamp is a silver certificate stamp, and is redeemable for 5 dollars silver, just as the RedFox stamp is a gold certificate stamp redeemable for one dollar in gold. Micro-printed on the stamp is a certificate number which is only viewable by a special lens, which is available only at selected post offices.
|
Well I can get hold of a Fox stamp and am familiar enough with optics to find any encryptions and am sure enough this is myth that I will not bother finding the stamp to check it out.
The purpose for Libel of Review and US cognizance of the Refusal for Cause process is simply a better Certificate of Mailing. Dale, at the main post office is an IRS agent. He doesn't know it because he does it for free but he really despises me coming in there with a new suitor teaching how to do the process. Except that he really makes a wonderful point about clerks offering legal advice, I would complain about Dale and I could get him in real trouble for how rude he gets with me.
One day he out-and-out said, "That will never hold up in court." And there it is. I told him the objective is that it never gets in court. Why leave room for doubt? What Dale the attorney's pet would prefer, is that we keep the Certificate of Service on a separate form, like designed by the Postal Service. The problem with that is that the Form and the documentation can be separated from one another, then you need to call a hearing to have a finding of fact... Attorneys make their living...
Since all the information is on the document, that goes on the Certificate of Mailing Form, one simply affixes the $1.05 charge for the Certificate of Mailing to the document. One suitor got into the postal regs and found that a copy of the Form will suffice, so find attached an improvement to the clerk instruction.
The entire objective is always to make it clear at first glance there is absolutely no need for further hearings or finding of facts. Read that clerk instruction! Who is going to dispute that? Who would ever say that did not happen?
Regards,
David Merrill.