Quote:
Originally posted by andrewmitch
On my deed is a stamp that says "RECORDING JURISDICTION" and then the town writting in. This could be the crux of the matter. No recording = No Jurisdiction ?????
|
Proper recording is certainly a piece to the puzzle but is not the crux. It may be disregarded alltogether, although that may not be wise. The recording of statutory transactions are required, however, but we don't want to go there, right?
As previously mentioned, jurisdiction is determined by the nature of the transaction. Realtors, mortgage brokers, banks, title companies, attorneys are all statutorily regulated and are required to facilitate statutory transactions only. They must all be avoided.
The county recorder is the proper place to record your documents and is used by the corporation as well. The problem is that most, if not all states, have a corporate recorder that is used for real estste transactions. Chances are, that your documents will be recorded there. That is why I would suggest publishing your docs in the newspaper so as to avoid this problem.
Quote:
Originally posted by andrewmitch
or how about this - RECORD it w/ another town with a much lower tax rate. Pay the lower tax to the other town and let the other town defend the position with your current town?????? seriously though the more i dig into this the more i think i can win. the issue is can i deal w/ the harrassment that is sure to come after the victory??? or how do i remedy the harrassment...
|
This is utterly ridiculous and you cannot win. If you want to avoid harrassment, structure your transaction properly the first time and be done with it.
gldskr