Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts
The question was neither 'disingenious' nor 'insincere', the question was a mere expression of inquirry, sincerely wanting to know more about your reasons and rationales for the belief system you have. As you so aptly stated, the answer from my point of view had already been presented.
As to the subject of changing the laws; it was you that brought that point into discussion in stating "Agreed, those limits were put in place at a time long passed and the presumed/default status of a man, as Weis has explained in numerous threads, has been changed.", the last three words in context to the 'presumption' of law written by another man/woman and the status of a man. Your monologue at that point was in regard to state and federal statutes or laws and inferring either an agreement with the 'changes' that were made or a disagreement with those changes.
As to the perception that you have on the subject matter; Each of us have a unique relationship with the Creator, and to each of us the Creator has a different manner of approaching our intellect. We are probably near to being on the same page, and as we study one anothers' writings, over a course of time, we may find concurrance on the other matters.
I have enjoyed this conversation with you.
Jerry
|
Excellent points Jerry.
The free exchange of thoughts and ideas is how understanding on a variety of subjects (as well as each other) is gained.
Is is through the forced acceptance of thought and ideas (under the guise of being law) that so many freedoms are lost.
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
|
