
02-05-2008, 11:13 AM
|
|
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 442
|
|
|
Ugh. I'm going to throw up.
|

02-05-2008, 11:51 AM
|
|
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 442
|
|
|
From The above site:
"All this is totally unlawful unless someone other than the people owned the people's possessions. Yet, they are still being pledged as collateral, secured by UCC commercial liens, which are still being monetized as "debt money" by the Federal Reserve, to be surrendered if they needed to be under the orders of the bankruptcy, and thereby have deprived the people of clear title to their property under color of a contrived emergency."
Somehow it seems that the UCC is a type of accounting system and it seems like we the people just might actually be in charge of it! So that when someone files a lien, or actually what constitutes a lien reversal thereof, that this is paid automatically...by someone and I am still trying to figure out just who that someone is. I don't think it is the IRS because they are an appendage of the 'government' and not the government itself.
Is it the Comptroller of the Currency? When I began to investigate my credit report, I noticed on the back for disputes that there were three entities to write to dispute a valid calm and one was the above with the second the Federal Reserve Board and the third was the Federal Trade Commission. Now when I worked for the DoF (yes, I worked for them and the DoD even though I was an ex-convict because I declared this openly but ONLY to the Defense Investigation Services and I did get my bachelor's degree in computer science plus I was a government certified hacker) I had access (read only, lol and it was an old BEAST system like in New Mexico, FYI) to the Washington National Financial Management System (WNFMS). This system was called 'Atlantis'.
Working for the FDIC, I found where the S&L loan scandal had accountants packaging performing and non-performing assets for resale and were using Atlantis for this purpose. I think all of these guys are tied in together and when someone (anyone) files a UCC lien, which I believe that Atlantis does automatically, it f*cks them up because they do not have the control to track it and checks are issued automatically thus the ability to control the issuance to anyone outside of the system but anyone is able to file through the Secretary of State, as guaranteed by the constitution, and can do that and without the intervention of the IRS or other such public entity because they do not have the automation in place to track it and curtail it before 'presentment' AND OUR CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES US THE RIGHT TO FILE UCC 1.
What an operation.....It's like a diamond heist right under our noses.
Last edited by sheisaceo : 02-05-2008 at 11:58 AM.
|

02-05-2008, 11:53 AM
|
|
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 442
|
|
|
Isn't the 'Comptroller of the Currency' who issues yearly tax refund checks with respect to the previous posting?
|

02-05-2008, 12:08 PM
|
|
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 442
|
|
|
Look at this:
"17. On May 23, 1933, Congressman Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of the United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON. The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee, and has yet to be acted upon. (See: the Congressional Record, May 23, 1933, pp. 4055-4058.)"
I haven't found anything about what the outcome of this was...yet.
|

02-05-2008, 12:27 PM
|
|
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 442
|
|
|
"It appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Service Agents etc., are "Agents of a Foreign Principal" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938." They are directed and controlled by the corporate "Governor" of The Fund" a/k/a "Secretary of Treasury" (See: Public Law 94-564, supra, pg. 5942, U.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480 & 481, 26 U.S.C.A. 7701(a)(11), Treasury Delegation Order No. 150-10), and the corporate "Governor" of "The Bank" 22 U.S.C.A. 286 & 286a, acting as "information service employees 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(ii), and have been and do now "solicit, collect, disburse or dispense contribution (Tax - pecuniary contribution, Black's Law Dict. 5th ed.), loans, money or other things of value for or in interest of such foreign principal 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(iii), and they entered into agreements with a Foreign Principal pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91 i.e. the "Agency For International Development." (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(2))"
Ohmigod, so to file UCC 1, a person is actually filing against the money system belonging outside of the USA. So this system, then is being watched at the upper echelons outside of our continental borders.
Therefore to speak publicly about this then AFTER RECEIVING THE PRESENTMENT FROM THE UCC 1 FILING, is to be complicit in a fraud...THEIR FRAUD... and the right to remain silent, regarding the fifth amendment, is relative to that.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:32 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|