Robert Schulz rats out his followers

[psholtz]

Originally Posted by jeagas68

Man, this one is loaded with speech about getting benefits and privileges from Britain and other European governments, it even mentions intentions of a Corporate Enterprise rather then states doing regular business as usual. For something that was suppose to be foreign from the several states they sure did help themselves to the cookie jar in the interest of a Corporation.
Just connecting the dots for you hear due to the fact that the U.S. Corporation was first registered starting the year 1787 a full 2 years before the answer stated in my next entry of this post below.

Yes, these are interesting points you raise.

entitlement: an absolute right to a (usually monetary) benefit, such as social security, granted immediately upon meeting a legal requirement.

-- Black's Law, 7th Edition

Indeed, there are many commercial benefits to the Union, were there not?

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by jeagas68

Hag 1:13
Then spake Haggai the LORD'S messenger in the LORD'S message unto the people, saying, I [am] with you, saith the LORD.

Jer 51:31
One post shall run to meet another, and one messenger to meet another, to shew the king of Babylon that his city is taken at [one] end,

And what does this have to do with the Constitution being a "Golden Calf"? Here are the The Federalist Papers. Please connect the dots you suggest are here, or in the Constitution.

Further, does any of this have any connection with Robert Schulz, or his followers?

[Soldier of Truth]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

- disbelieving that such obviously admiralty process could ever issue out of the Mile High City - Denver.

Part 9. Criminal Investigation
Chapter 7. Asset Seizure and Forfeiture
Section 2. Civil Seizure and Forfeiture
9.7.2 Civil Seizure and Forfeiture

* 9.7.2.1 Overview
* 9.7.2.2 Statutory Authority and Investigative Jurisdiction
* 9.7.2.3 Civilly Forfeitable Property
* 9.7.2.4 Statute of Limitations
* 9.7.2.5 Seizure of Property For Civil Forfeiture
* 9.7.2.6 Pre-Seizure Planning
* 9.7.2.7 Methods of Seizure for Civil Forfeiture
* 9.7.2.8 Administrative Forfeiture Proceedings
* 9.7.2.9 Civil Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings
* Exhibit 9.7.2-1 Request for Adoption of State or Local Seizure
* Exhibit 9.7.2-2 Forfeiture Letter/Notice of Intent to Forfeit
* Exhibit 9.7.2-3 Notice of Seizure
* Exhibit 9.7.2-4 Seized Asset Claim Form

9.7.2.1 (07-25-2007)
Overview

1.

Civil forfeiture is an in rem proceeding against the property itself, not the owner of property. Civil forfeiture is a process that is separated from, and not dependent on, a criminal prosecution. Civil forfeiture can proceed administratively or judicially. (Italics relief in original.)

<http://www.irs.gov/irm/part9/ch07s02.html>

[jeagas68]

Originally Posted by BOBT12

And what does this have to do with the Constitution being a "Golden Calf"? Here are the The Federalist Papers. Please connect the dots you suggest are here, or in the Constitution.
Further, does any of this have any connection with Robert Schulz, or his followers?

You asked a question and I answered, don't try to quote my answer by twisting it around to be something else. I think people on this forum are much smarter then you think.
|
|
v

Originally Posted by BOBT12

Then why are you here, it looks like the fix is in, for you?

And on another note, I guess you can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink.

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by jeagas68

You asked a question and I answered, don't try to quote my answer by twisting it around to be something else. I think people on this forum are much smarter then you think.
|
|
v


And on another note, I guess you can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink.

Whatever, have fun reading between the lines.

[jeagas68]

Originally Posted by psholtz

Yes, these are interesting points you raise.
Indeed, there are many commercial benefits to the Union, were there not?

Who's name is at the very top of the form before anyone else, that is the one with the entitlement.

Just depends on what side of the fence you want to be on.. Master or Slave. Just remember everything you use that you did not create is accepting benefits with strings attached.. aka enslavement.
Be a creator and not a taker, it will get you much further in life.