1099-OID, 1040-V, 1096, form 56, 1040

[fulltitle]

Without Prejudice.
I have not heard of anyone else focus on the 1099-A but I have had reason to believe that they treat a lot things as 'abandonment' due to because treating the ignorance of a party to a transaction as an abandonment in full knowledge allows them to deal with their consciensce if they have one. I have hinted to this notion somewhat in discussions concerning abandonment of claims or counterclaims. Failure to use remedies, exemptions or the like could also be taken as a kind of abandonment. Look into admiralty about abandonment.

Who would think that leaving certain paperwork at a bank could be taken as a type of abandonment?

Because of the times I will provide here what could be a very insightful piece of information:

If Party A and Party B contract to produce widgets, and in their contract they both vest assets/machinery/land/etc. into the project/contract the original planting of trees is at the contract [the original vesting of assets, equipment or know-how into the joint venture at the outset would likely be a 'capital receipt' in tax land]. Widgets produced as a result might be seen as fruit from the original tree.

[ezrhythm]

Thanks Phreeman but I can't accept all the credit. The first link in that post contains all of those in the list.

[phreeman2003]

but you did post here for those who asked.

[moishanb]

Originally Posted by fulltitle

Without Prejudice.
I have not heard of anyone else focus on the 1099-A but I have had reason to believe that they treat a lot things as 'abandonment' due to because treating the ignorance of a party to a transaction as an abandonment in full knowledge allows them to deal with their consciensce if they have one. I have hinted to this notion somewhat in discussions concerning abandonment of claims or counterclaims. Failure to use remedies, exemptions or the like could also be taken as a kind of abandonment. Look into admiralty about abandonment.

Who would think that leaving certain paperwork at a bank could be taken as a type of abandonment?

Because of the times I will provide here what could be a very insightful piece of information:

If Party A and Party B contract to produce widgets, and in their contract they both vest assets/machinery/land/etc. into the project/contract the original planting of trees is at the contract [the original vesting of assets, equipment or know-how into the joint venture at the outset would likely be a 'capital receipt' in tax land]. Widgets produced as a result might be seen as fruit from the original tree.

This is just as good a time as any to input something I just came across in the Domestic Mail Manual, Section 601(Mailability) subsection 12.7 SKILL Contests, and referring to 39 USC 3001(K)(3)(B).

I contend that every adversary proceeding is a skill contest, and falls under the requirements of the DMM(Domestic Mail Manual), and these skill contests are only mailable if they meet all of the requirements of section 12.7.2 of the DMM. A GOOD READ!!!

[phreeman2003]

This is just as good a time as any to input something I just came across in the Domestic Mail Manual, Section 601(Mailability) subsection 12.7 SKILL Contests, and referring to 39 USC 3001(K)(3)(B).

I contend that every adversary proceeding is a skill contest, and falls under the requirements of the DMM(Domestic Mail Manual), and these skill contests are only mailable if they meet all of the requirements of section 12.7.2 of the DMM. A GOOD READ!!!

http://pe.usps.gov/text/dmm300/601.htm

Seems suitable on its face.

[David Merrill]

I just received an encouraging report about the 1099-OID Form and many Treasury checks! I should have that evidence package soon.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[fulltitle]

Without Prejudice.
Expansion for those who maybe dont get it: the products of the contracts on the market are perhaps fruit off the tree [original contract]. Think fruit/interest and tree/principal--therefore why the merchandise can be rendered as interest. I'm saying this in case some folk need to defend the logic. In private I hvae discussed or related this but I am putting this here for good measure.

Also [more tax law/theory]: Branches can also be sources [not just trees] because branches can bear fruit as well. Branches can be both sources and destintations persay.

Again endorsement of a check or other negotiable instrument creates a NEW ISSUE and likely converting a non-negotiable intoa negotiable with an allonge is a NEW ISSUE [David Merrill: it might be fruitful to ponder that in light of bank allonges on mortage that their allonge is perhaps a new issue on top of perhaps an original non-negotaible issue.]

Also: Think very deeply about the nature of the SSA or IRS/Treasury entites and the respective powers of such organizations.

re: "skill test" that is basically what's been said all along..re: mailbox as court.

[robhalford88]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

I just received an encouraging report about the 1099-OID Form and many Treasury checks! I should have that evidence package soon.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Trust you to be on the ball. Good job.
Keep us updated.