11-18-2006, 07:06 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,149
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ice
Can someone tell me where I can find the cite in regards to the IRS responding to mail/letters/inquiries??& For some reason this has disappeared from my vast number files.
|
The Treasury is not governmental. It is a cabal of international bankers. It is not required to respond to FOIA or any other requests and if you call for instance for your IMF, the papers that arrive in the mail will not meet any Rules of Evidence to use against the Treasury in court - unless you know about admiralty proceedings.
note the attachments in this Notice of Interlocutory Appeal - State level:
Regards,
David Merrill.
Last edited by David Merrill : 11-18-2006 at 07:20 AM.
|
11-18-2006, 07:14 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by idknow
this is the first msg posted and the user's registration should be undone and IP blocked.
|
Yep!! Who is the mystery spammer? Hmmmm! 
__________________
Resolution pending
|
11-18-2006, 04:40 PM
|
|
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,117
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by charlesa6
Yep!! Who is the mystery spammer? Hmmmm! |
i swear it wodnt me 
slowly i turn
step by step
away from the keybd |
11-18-2006, 08:10 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by idknow
i swear it wodnt me
slowly i turn
step by step
away from the keybd |
Hehehehe!! I can help it, you are very hilarious. I like it do. Grin !!!!
__________________
Resolution pending
|
11-21-2006, 07:33 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,616
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ice
Can someone tell me where I can find the cite in regards to the IRS responding to mail/letters/inquiries??& For some reason this has disappeared from my vast number files.
|
At least two cites, but maybe not what you were hoping for:
Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees (1979) 441 US 463, 60 L.Ed.2d 360, 99 S.Ct 1826:
Quote:
{US at 464-465, L.Ed at 363, S.Ct at 1828}
The First Amendment right to associate and to advocate 'provides no guarantee that a speech will persuade or that advocacy will be effective.' [quoting Hanover Federation of Teachers v. Hanover Community School Corp. (7th Cir. 1972) 457 F2d 456 at 461] The public employee surely can associate and speak freely and petition openly, and he is protected by the First Amendment from retaliation for doing so. ... But the First Amendment does not impose any affirmative obligation on the government to listen, to respond or, in this context, to recognize the association and bargain with it.
|
More directly with regard to the IRS, We The People Fndn Inc. v. US (D.D.C. Aug. 31, 2005) 96 AFTR2d 6126, 2005 u.s.dist. LEXIS 20409, 2005 WL 2473698:
Quote:
The FIrst Amendment provides that 'Congress shall make no law ... abridging ... the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.' Plaintiffs {= WTP and Bob Schulz, etc.} contend that they therefore have a constitutional right to a response to the petitions they have filed with the various defendants {=IRS, DOJ, etc.}, and that defendants have committed 'constitutional torts' against plaintiffs in failing to respond to their petitions. ... The Supreme Court, however, has held that 'the First Amendment does not impose any affirmative obligation on the government to listen, to respond, or, in this context, to recognize the association and bargain with it." [quoting Smith v. Ark. State Hwy Empl.] Plaintiff's claims that the defendants are obligated to 'properly' respond to plaintiffs' petitions shall thus be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
|
|
11-21-2006, 07:40 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,149
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
At least two cites, but maybe not what you were hoping for:
Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees (1979) 441 US 463, 60 L.Ed.2d 360, 99 S.Ct 1826:
More directly with regard to the IRS, We The People Fndn Inc. v. US (D.D.C. Aug. 31, 2005) 96 AFTR2d 6126, 2005 u.s.dist. LEXIS 20409, 2005 WL 2473698:
|
I could never hope for more Shoonra;
Thank you!
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...eedom_Ring.jpg |
11-21-2006, 08:00 AM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 709
|
|
|
IRS is not a government agency, so they are not required to respond, and the same is true for us: we are not required to respond to IRS. I have refused several IRS letters because they refuse to respond to mine. When they persist after ignorning my letters, I do the same. I 'refuse for fraud' on front of the envelope in red felt tip pen. Just the other day I got a respond from IRS regarding that... interesting to say the least.
|
11-22-2006, 01:06 AM
|
|
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1
|
|
big bonus $500 casino win - no deposit
|
11-22-2006, 05:45 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
|
|
|
cialisvs******, welcome to the suijuris forum. Your ad is in wrong thread. You have to move it to service provider. Thanks.
__________________
Resolution pending
|
11-23-2006, 06:43 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,438
|
|
|
That kind of spam deserves instant ban....
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:46 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|
