Form letter IRS LTR 2645C

[SKYGZR]

Hi all, from another "group"

<begin snip>

I received an automated letter from Fresno thanking me for my
correspondence received on jan, 27, 2005.

"The letter says "We have not resolved this matter because we haven't
completed all the processing necessary for a complete response.
However, we will contact you again within 45 days with our reply..."

Strange as I did not send any letter to them.
The letter then goes on to say that I can still make payments to
reduce my tax liability!

The letter is IRS LTR 2645C
There is some coded info referring to me in the upper right hand
corner of the letter.

<end snip>

Any here seen or been sent one of these? I may have (2) of them, yet have not opened them. Considering "return to sender, refused for cause", since this may constitute mail fraud. As on the face of the letter, showing through the envelope, clearly lists Department of the Treasury / Internal Revenue Service. The IRS is not part of this Government Fiction. Thoughts?

One idea would be to return the presentments you have rec’d by registered mail and write on the outside of the envelope, ‘This offer to contract is refused for fraud and unjust cause, without recourse, without dishonor, without prejudice with explicit reservation, UCC1-207'

http://autarchic.tripod.com/files/dixon.html

"Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207 is much more than a "suggestion" when written above your signature. A reservation of Rights vitiates the W4/license/summons by placing a non-assumpsit "condition" upon the now non-negotiable unit at UCC 3-104.2.

The "promise" of UCC 3-104.3 is void ab initio and cannot "make liable" the "promise" under penalty of perjury at UCC 3-104.3. No performance is required for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and "lawful money of the United States" is not germane to "relief sought."

Subject matter is as simple as understanding that there must be a contract, summons, or tacit "dishonor" of Maritime jurisdiction. Subject matter is the "nature of cause of actions and of relief sought."

Black's Law 5 th : Cause. "Something that precedes and brings about; to effect as an agent; to bring into existence; to make to induce; to compel."

Operating a vehicle on the street "requires" license of commercial operators. Your "unconditional" signature upon the unit gives "police power" to agency per agreement signed with full knowledge of its content. The subject is commercial and you are a card carrying member of Maritime Jurisdiction and "accepting benefit" of "trafficking."

The Citizen must rebut the "cause of action" a little different than Paul did. The Free born must deny all jurisdiction of agency to remain In Propria Persona.

We do not accept the "benefit" of agency "due process" and aver to the God given Bill of Rights. By not accepting another "officer of the court" as attorney, agency is estoppel of procedural "due process" by adhesion, for no one has your "power of attorney" to "take leave" of your Bill of Rights.

A Christian Man must be aware of the Spiritual cost of waiving any Rights whatsoever. When asked if the charges are clear, a NO will demand the "cause of action."

The "proof of the matter stated" is contract or lack thereof and a statement of "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207, I wish to remain silent" will estoppel agency and stay the matter at the administrative level.

"Without Prejudice" is "notice" to agency that a "suggestion" has been made to deny jurisdiction per Rule 12 (b). "Color of law" statutes are very clear, and "the court shall dismiss the action."

The judge would violate his oath to act in a personal manner to harm anyone, and "made liable" and "obligated" to the Citizen for violation of Rights. The court officers 12 (6) "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted," is fatal. The officers "service" of summons would also be flawed if a reservation of Rights were visible above the Citizens signature on W-4/license/summons, for no indictment, no "arrest" by surrogate is admissible.

Information, Presentment, or any "mail box policy" stands as truth if not rebutted. All Legislated Statutes should be treated as rebutable presumption and harmful to in-personam citizenship. Matters not what agency activity the individual is involved within, jurisdiction can be challenged at any time. "Without prejudice' UCC 1-207, will stand as rebuttal, 'answer' and 'discovery' 'prima facie' on the Administrative record as notice to 'abate." Any of the above creates "estoppel of agency', when the issue lacks 'in-personam" jurisdiction. There will be "no cause where relief may be granted" to agency at the administrative level. Agency gets into much mischief if it attempts to raise a "dead in Law" issue, without assent.

"Remedy" is final within The Uniform Commercial Code. We the People were given "limited liability," due to the usurpation of Constitutional 'lawful money." Government hath not the power to repeal The Bill of Rights, even at statute Civil Liberties. Government activity only creates the allusion of sovereignty by our birth in a corporate State hospital per certificate and unconditional contract. A Citizen makes himself subject to the 14th Amendment public policy by waiving their individual rights on the very forms they fill out on any given day. These forms serve as an Affidavit in personam, because the negotiable units are signed under penalty of perjury. A representative statement vitiates 'promise' to appear in any capacity at the presumptive agency tribunal. Unless rebutted, these contracts serve as "certified' fact on the Administrative Record before the tribunal at bar, with your 'unconditional' 'in-personam' (Fed. Rule 12. b) 'writing." Your choice was "taxation without representation' for you did not avoid consequences of an 'unconscionable, 'unconditional" and now negotiable unit. Your tithes are in the synagogues of a de facto Master and our Lord is not pleased.

The Article I "inferior court', district attorney and your lawyer will only follow the procedures set forth by the record. Your representative should be on the record as 'without prejudice'. If you do not rebut, the 14th Amendment of Article I 'inferior' court will try facts and subject matter only with a 'fair and impartial jury', rather than 'peers' trying 'fact and law' of Article III. The district attorney will not be sworn by 'Thee People' at Article II Executive to follow the 'Public' Law at Calif. Code 22.2, he will follow The State of California at Federal 'public policy'. Your attorney does not know "state" Citizen Rights, only federal 'forum' 'persons' procedure of the Tribunal per the Code of Military justice, which has been 'adopted' by most states.

Jurisdiction must be challenged at every issue to keep the controversy at the administrative level. The two required jurisdictions of 'personam' and 'subject matter' will not be served in the same court, unless it is Article III. A prayer to equity must only reap equity.

A commercial Tribunal must be dealt with commercially, the court must be bound to subject matter only and the Citizen must retain his 'personam'. Your personam is 'common Law' at Bill of Rights, not equity, unless you failed to reserve your Rights.

The rule still stands, if you are challenged by equity, you must answer with equity. "Without prejudice" UCC1-207 is Remedy because the 'representation' in-personam reveals the 'discovery' that no Rights were thereby waived at Bill of Rights.

UCC1-103.6 is equalizer via equity and notice, now the code must be read in harmony with the common Law at Cal. Code. 22.2. This section of the UCC is the only place the Constitution and equity may be joined without 'contempt' of tribunal.

A court which presumes you will appear, cannot issue a criminal warrant for 'failure to appear' at corporate bar. 'Without prejudice', written above your 'writing' at UCC 3.104.1, destroys its "unconditional" requirement at UCC 3-104.2 and 'promise' is forfeit at UCC 3-104.3. It serves as a bar to all others at 'Obligation of Contract' that a 'condition' is prima facie upon the unit and it is utterly void at Law.

It is 'proclivity of your adversary not to answer', so do not expect agency to give you any information on the above material.

Stand your ground as intended when facing an adversary.

Agency may play 'ignorant' and use 'mail box policy'

ANSWER EVERYTHING.

Force agency to write down their issues and mail them to you. Letters are the best facts and each failure to answer on the part of agency is further 'estoppel.'

Phone calls are 'parol' and courts will offer you a 'parol' chance to explain yourself for 'dishonoring' agency presentment by 'creditable' agency phone call.

[KITCHIE]

The problem is that you are in an Admiralty/Maritime court. They change the rules to what ever they want them to be and you lose. Simply ask them for the "Bid Bond" I think it's number is 724, endorse it and go home. You are in a bankruptcy court all the time at all levels.

Kitchie

By the way Free_Martha you still have not provided me with the download.

[SKYGZR]

free_martha, Thanks for the input, yet AVOID citing the UCC!! See "copy/paste" below:

<snip>

BE CAREFUL!

The federal UCC is federal municipal law:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/ucc/77stat630.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/ucc/77stat631.gif

Use the LANGUAGE of the UCC, but do NOT cite to any
sections in the federal MUNICIPAL U.C.C. A federal
judge might just take SILENT JUDICIAL NOTICE of
that citation, and conclude (incorrectly) that you
have "elected" to be treated AS IF you are subject
to federal municipal statutes (like all federal
citizens).

The UCC's section numbers move around anyway.

1-207 just recently moved (1-308 now, I believe).

Do this instead:
REFUSED FOR CAUSE WITHOUT DISHONOR
(but be sure to explain your "cause(s)" somewhere/somehow)

e.g.
REFUSED FOR CAUSE: violates 31 U.S.C. 333
(on U.S. Mail you are tired of getting from the
IRS, because they have failed to exhibit a
liability statute for IRC subtitle A)


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Private Attorney General
http://www.supremelaw.org/

<end snip>

Think I will use a combination of suggestions...

[idknow]

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

The problem is that you are in an Admiralty/Maritime court.
They change the rules to what ever they want them to be and you lose. Simply
ask them for the "Bid Bond" I think it's number is 724, endorse it and go home.
You are in a bankruptcy court all the time at all levels.

Kitchie

By the way Free_Martha you still have not provided me with the download.

Kitchie!!!!! I had to use Marth's name but it applies to your ref of the 724 bond.

<you know the melody!>
Martha, my dear,
Would you please explain this ref'rence to me, please?
be kind to me.

Martha, my dear,
dont ignore me.
Martha my dear.

Touch your keyboard, you silly girl;
Look what you've said.

When you want to tell me that i dont know
whatcha gonna think i say, silly girl.

Take a good look at what you said
take a good look and read
that you and me must agree with each other...
silly girl

roflmao