Taxation Discuss Taxation (IRS, Real Estate Taxes, Car Taxes, etc.).


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Taxation
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #91  
Old 02-02-2005, 04:11 AM
iamfreeru2 iamfreeru2 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,685
JM,

Yes I have other things to send with the BoE to discharge. Send me an email and I will send you what I have. I have had success with it so far.

iamfreeru2
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 03-07-2005, 12:07 PM
jmunson
 
Posts: n/a
Received Notice of Levy

somehow the IRS thinks i "work" for the company my parents own...

i have to laugh because the PERSON they claim works for them doesn't.

and, technically, neither do i - i am not an employee of theirs, nor do i receive any paychecks.

i am compensated via food & such, but no directly-to-me "money."

ha!

and the ball keeps on rollin...

jon

p.s. iamfreeru2 - 3/12 can't get here soon enough...sheesh...
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 03-08-2005, 06:33 AM
jmunson
 
Posts: n/a
ok, my folks and i have had a discussion relative to that alleged notice, and here are our options:

1. don't respond to it. it wasn't sent certified, and there appears to be no response mandated anywhere on the stuff.
2. send a letter stating "that person is not employed here."
3. send the attached. it is a modification of weiss' material (thanks w!), re-written from the "employer's" perspective querying the IRS as to the legitimacy of the notice per weiss' material.

my mom is loathe to "red flag" the business by doing option 3. can you say fear and intimidation? she's leaning to number 1.

what sayeth ya'll?

jon
Attached Images
File Type: pdf Response20050308.pdf (22.0 KB, 9 views)
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 03-08-2005, 07:14 AM
iamfreeru2 iamfreeru2 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,685
Jon,

Not responding would be a dishonor and I would not suggest that. If you respond with IRC you are saying that you are subject to it. This I would not do either, although is only my suggestion and you must do what you must do. By sending this I believe you are creating an argument (also a dishonor) and one that you will lose. Remember the IRS and the government have exclusive legislative jurisdiction in the District of Columbia. I am going to e-mail you a document that I want you to read before you make any decision on what to do. I would ask that you read it with an open mind. It may help you decide on your next course of action. It is 65 pages and was sent to me a few days ago. Many things I already knoew, but some I did not
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 03-08-2005, 07:45 AM
jmunson
 
Posts: n/a
so, to make sure i understand:

1. non-response is no good [this is my thinking as well, but i needed to post the option for feedback anyway], even though there appears to be no response required.

2. "not employed here" is OK.

3. asking for clarification of the IRC that the IRS is attempting to hold PEACEFUL VALLEY, INC., to is admitting to some sort of jurisdiction? correct me if i'm wrong, however, as PEACEFUL VALLEY, INC., is an S-Corp (creature of the STATE), isn't it already within the jurisdiction of the IRS? and, how can asking for clarification (not a denial!) be argumentative? (i think we've been down this road). btw, nowhere in that doc is a denial of compliance w/o asking for clarification. i guess you could say it is a form of VoD. also, how can asking them to comply with their own laws/rules be dishonorable/argumentative? aren't they "contractually" obligated to do so?

there was a case recently, microsoft as a matter of fact, wherein Eolas and MS were going at it over plug-in tech for browsers. MS initially lost, but appealed. the upper court ruled the judge in the lower court blatantly screwed up and awarded the appeal and remanded back to lower court for re-trial. if gov't can screw up, why can't the IRS?

at any rate, i look forward to your email as i know it'll be informative.

thank you for your response(s) so far!

jon
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 03-08-2005, 11:06 AM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,400
Man, Good Format

Glad I could help. I am beefing that up even more as we speak.
It's gonna be a killa!
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 06-12-2008, 11:38 AM
psyflyer psyflyer is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Hi, First post.

I was just sent a Notice of Deficiency from Parizek and it pisses me off because they want about 10 grand. I just settled for about 10 grand an audit not even two weeks ago, this is bull... My acountant was a former IRS auditor so I shall see what he thinks. Any advice Id appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 06-13-2008, 11:53 AM
ThomPaine ThomPaine is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: georgia state
Posts: 445
not legal advice, just an opinion:

dont talk to an accountant about taxes. That is akin to asking Hitler about personnel managment.

He is part of the system and will give you an inside the box answer. If you want to learn the truth, you should spend some time (lots of time) on here reading. It has all been covered many, many, many times before.

Welcome to the forums and good luck on your quest.

Thom
__________________
Blowing down the house of cards, one puff at a time.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cites - FDCPA (Title 15, Chapter 41, Subchapter V) suijuris Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 38 11-04-2007 03:54 PM
Credit Cards violating U.S antitrust laws ! truth4all Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 7 09-12-2005 08:30 PM
Employers & Levy Notices weishaupt1776 Taxation 6 02-17-2005 02:15 PM
administrative notices jacob morosky Citizenship & Jurisdiction 5 09-13-2004 10:04 PM
alleged tax debts and personal notices? Randy Taxation 0 03-06-2004 02:32 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer