IRS Notice(s) of Deficiencies

just an update...


been over 30 days (weekends & holidays discounted) and no reply from the IRS regarding my query & good faith tender.


not that, of course, not receiving a timely reply is unheard of in their case...


should i proceed with some sort of Notice of Default, or something else?& or should i just "sit on it" for a while yet?


jon

[rushpat]

You might want to consider sending a Notice of Default with Opportunity to Cure, an additional 3 or 10 days (I'm not sure of the standard... I used 10 days). This gives the appearance that you've truly tried to give them every chance and more to fulfill their obligations.

Afterwards, when you don't hear anything again after the final time limit, then issue a Notice of Default, or non-response, whatever you prefer, have it notarized, publish in the county recorder (some are getting them filed in the federal district courts under the Misc file). Some may also want to publish it in the legal section of the newspaper as a public notice. Then send a final copy of that to the IRS. You might also send a warning of estoppel with this.

I'm trying to find out more about the steps afterwards.

i am not versed in those documents.


any help there?


jon

[rushpat]

Another very good support group, especially when it comes to common law remedies:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lawwork/

join this, then go into the Files area, where you will see examples of many. The ones to Budget Rental Car, plus the Quick Finding in Fact, Conclusions at Law.

It's really just a notice that they've been given time to respond, but haven't, and they've now defaulted, but they an opporunity to cure (another 3 or 10 days). In my case, I wrote a one page letter describing their original letter, my response asking them to provide blah, blah, blah within 3 days (in my case). Then I wrote up an affidavit, stating that I had:

- not received any documentation or been presented with any evidence that they responded to my letter dated.

and the same about not seeing evidence that they rebutted my affidavit attached with the response letter.

When this is all over, I may publish my docs.

thanks!


i'll take a look at it...


jon

[weishaupt1776]

Hello,

I am in extreme dishonor right now regarding a deficiency notice.

I WAS a student of the Schiff ARGUMENT method & have recently attended

Victoria Joy's seminar. The BoE approach is endorsed by her, but the bond approach is used by Rice.

Which way do we go, George?

Another very good support group, especially when it comes to common law remedies: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lawwork/ join this, then go into the Files area, where you will see examples of many.



I joined lawwork a few weeks ago. While I think Clyde's default is good, he doesn't seem to know how to enforce the default. He maybe knowledgeable about the law, but he is extremely closed minded with respect to the ALL CAP name UCC-1 argument, and that is where I think he is WRONG. The court sees you as the ALL CAP name and Clyde thinks the court sees the real man when IT DOESN'T. That's a fact.



Clyde is also very rude. He sent me a nasty email regarding the "TRASH" I posted. His excuse is always: "Maybe you don't belong in this group". Yeah, CLYDE, why don't you look in the mirror?

[Ice]

Clyde does not operate as a "fiction". (If they want to prove that he is a fiction they will have to do so. Why should we even acknowledge the fiction they want us to be a "surety" for? Think about it. Put them into the position of having to prove that you are NOT Sovereign.) "Redemption" tactics are not something that Clyde recommends. I think it can be simply stated that if you believe yourself to be Sovereign then act like it. And Clyde does.



He is all about the law... not gimmicks.

I recommend his groups as a source for study (and examples) of LAW.



Ice

hi all!



received a Form CP22E letter yesterday.



essentially, it listed the alleged debt plus penalties and interest and mentioned nothing of any previous correspondance. seems like they are attempting to start over...



at any rate, they ignored the previous letter entirely. although i didn't receive any "tax court" notices or indications such notices would be forthcoming.



so, my response is going to be:



Thank you for your non-response, Form CP22E, dated...



Once again, [repeat previous letter here]...



[attach CPN here]...



any other thoughts on this?



jon

[Ice]

You might want to ask them why they are trying to collect under the guise of a law that was "repealed".



... just a thought ...



Ice