Taxation Discuss Taxation (IRS, Real Estate Taxes, Car Taxes, etc.).


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Taxation
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 04-06-2004, 07:15 AM
jmunson
 
Posts: n/a
Re:ssn and right to work



isn't it a standard disclaimer of franchises:


"each franchise independantly owned and operated."


my folks have a franchise, and that's put on things for CYA for the "corporate home office."& when, reality will show the "corporate home office" does indeed dictate terms, etc., of operation blah blah.


jon
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-06-2004, 12:58 PM
goldphoenix's Avatar
goldphoenix goldphoenix is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 199
Re:ssn and right to work

<DIV>Keith,</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Is there something wrong with asking your corporate home office questions? I was, after all, directed to your office to get answers. I understand your disclaimer. However, isn't it the corporate home office that dictates terms of operation?</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>I could be in Joe Blow in Timbucktoo and the issue would remain the same. I am not asking for legal aid. I am asking you if you support the terms of not allowing a man or woman who has no social security number to work for your corporation/franchise. </DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>You also never came out and said what your prompt actions will be or what form of assistance/help you would provide. </DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>I am interested in resolving this situation. In order to do that I need to have an understanding, some clear answers, of how your corporation operates when it comes to people of diverse religious faith and/or citizenry. </DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Thank you for your attention to this matter,</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Paul</DIV>
<DIV>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>His response:</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=478325115-06042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Until you provide the information requested we are unable to assist you further since we do not know who to talk to.</FONT></SPAN></DIV></DIV>


&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;


I'm a bit confused about this. He's saying he will "help", and yet is refusing to answer any questions I have, including how he can help, other than saying he will talk to the franchise involved. He seems to be unwilling to put anything definitive into writing.


Any additional thoughts on how to proceed? Supply the guy with the info he wants? Or find out who "owns" the franchise and&speak to&them?


peace,


goldphoenix
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-06-2004, 07:02 PM
Ice's Avatar
Ice Ice is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,866
Re:ssn and right to work



After restating that it is a simple question you are asking him, why don't you just thank him for his <U>un</U>cooperative behavior and notice him that he may be called as a witness in your upcoming suit against the franchise and the corporation... which you are very confident of winning.


See if he gets a little more cooperative.


Then start getting your paperwork ready to file a complaint... take them to task... they think they know the law... let a judge prove to them that they don't.


I'll bet that it never gets to trial stage... they will want to settle with you asap... could be a nice little bit of change in your pocket if you prepare the case half way decent.


&
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-09-2004, 06:03 AM
Ice's Avatar
Ice Ice is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,866
Re:ssn and right to work



Maybe you should& contact these folks and see if they can help you:


http://www.iresist.com/ice/EmployersChallenge.html


Whatever happens... have fun!!


Gee... maybe you could get some $change$ out of this.


Ice
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-18-2004, 01:18 PM
goldphoenix's Avatar
goldphoenix goldphoenix is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 199
Re:ssn and right to work



Thank you Ice! I would call these gentlemen, however, I have no phone to do so.


Here are the latest emails I've sent and received. I wanted to let you all know how things are proceeding.


&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
<DIV>I am asking you some simple questions. Please allow me to restate the questions so I may make sure you are understanding them correctly.</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Does your corporate home office dictate the terms of operation?</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Are you willing to follow the Law and allow me to work for the company without a social security number? </DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Thank you for your uncooperative behavior in this matter. It seems to me that you are the one who wants to ask all the questions (who I am and where I am, as if that matters at this point in time) and are unwilling to give me some straightforward answers. </DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Take notice that you may be called as a witness in my upcoming suit against the franchise and the corporation. </DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>By the way, I'm very&confident I'll win.</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Here is some information for your perusal. Since you haven't stated what your position is, perhaps this will help you to decide what that is. </DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>


EEOC v Information Systems Consulting.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>


</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


As irrefutable proof that Social Security is indeed a voluntary


program, I offer the following: In Texas, the Justice Department argued


for the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) against an


employer who had, under IRS advice, refused to hire an individual who


would not provide a social security number. The complaint was styled as


a DISCRIMINATION action. The discrimination involves both religious


convictions and national origins (Americans are not required).</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>
</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


The IRS refused to appear in court to defend its advice to the


employer, who immediately folded when confronted in court with a team of


Justice Department lawyers suing him for discrimination. (Who wants to


be in court against the Justice Department without any legal facts to


stand on and no witness to call? ) The IRS typically passes out


incorrect or misleading information to the employer, and then refuses to


appear in the court room to defend the advice that the Employers are


acting on.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>
</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


The case proves beyond the shadow of any doubt what-so-ever that it is


NOT necessary to use a social security number in association with your


personal finances and earnings, If You Choose Not To!</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>
</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


EXCERPTS FROM


EEOC v. Information Systems Consulting


CA3-92-0169-T


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


DALLAS DIVISION</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>
</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


1. From the EEOC’s Letter of Determination, Dated May 2, 1990 (p.2)


The evidence supports the charge that there is a violation of Title VII


of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, as amended,... Section 706(b) of Title VII


requires that if the commission determines there is a reasonable cause


to believe that the charge is true, it shall endeavor to eliminate the


alleged unlawful employment practice by informal methods, of conference,


conciliation, and persuasion, having determined there is reasonable


cause to believe the charge is true, the Commission now invites the


parties to join with it in a collective effort toward a just resolution


of this matter.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>
</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


2. From the Affidavit of Tim Fitzpatrick, September 29, 1989 (p.3):


After discussions with the IRS, the company discovered that if Mr.


Hanson did not provide the company with a Social Security number, the


company would be in violation of the Internal Revenue Regulations and


subject to various penalties.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>
</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


3. From the Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, April


1, 1992 (p.8-9)


"...the Internal Revenue Code and the Regulations promulgated pursuant


to the code do not contain an absolute requirement that an employer


provide an employee social security number to the IRS.


Internal Revenue Code Section 6109(a)(3) states:</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>
</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>




Any person required under the authority of this title to make a return,


statement or other document with respect to another person, shall request from such person, and include in any such return, statement or document, such identifying number as may be prescribed for securing proper identification of such person. 26 USC 6109(a)(3) (Supp. 1992)"</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>

</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


The IRS regulation interpreting section 6109 provides:


"If he does not know the taxpayer identifying number of the other


person, he shall request such number of the other person. A request should state that the identifying number is required to be furnished under the law. When the person filing the return, statement, or other document does not know the number of the other person, and has complied with the request provision of this paragraph, he shall sign an affidavit on the transmittal document forwarding such returns, statements, or other documents to the Internal Revenue Service so stating..


Treas. Reg. 301.6109-1(c) (1991)"</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>

</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


"The applicable IRS statute and regulation places a duty on the


employer to request a taxpayer identifying number from the employee. If


document must be filed and the employer has been unable to obtain the


number, but has made the request, then the employer need only include an


affidavit stating that the request was made."</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>

</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


The Government also avers that: "In 1989, Internal Revenue Code Section


6676, 26 USC and 6676 (1989), set forth the penalties for failing to


supply the IRS with identifying numbers as required by the code....a


$50.00 penalty will be imposed for failure of an employer to provide an


identifying number on any document filed with the IRS unless it is shown


that the failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect.


The Treasury Regulation interpreting the Statute states:


Under Section 301.609-1(c) a payor is required to request the


identifying number of the payee. If after such a request has been made,


the payee does not furnish the payor with his identifying number, the


penalty will not be assessed against the payor.


Treas. Reg. 310.6676-1 (1989)"


"Public Law 101-239, Title VII, Section 7711(b)(1), Dec. 19, 1989, 103


Stat. 2393, repealed Section 6676 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 USC


6723 (Supp. 1992) has governed the failure to comply with information


reporting requirement. However, Internal Revenue Code Section 6724, 26


USC 6724 (Supp. 1992), provides for a waiver of any penalties assessed


under the code upon a showing of reasonable cause.


Section 6724(a) provides:


No penalty shall be imposed under this part with respect to any failure


if it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not


willful neglect. 26 USC 6724(a) (Supp. 1992)"</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3>

</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>


4. From the Consent Decree, dated November 4, 1992 (p.4)


"The defendant ... shall be permanently enjoined from terminating an


employee or refusing to hire an individual for failure to provide a


social security number.... If an employee or applicant for employment


advises the defendant that he does not have a social security


number....., the defendant shall request, pursuant to Section 6724 of


the Internal Revenue Service Code {sic}, 26 USC 6724, a waiver of any


penalties that may be imposed for failing to include an employee social


security number on forms and documents submitted to the IRS.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3> </FONT></FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman">


Did you know that there is no law requiring an American to obtain, have or use a social security number to live or work in the United States? ... yet strangely, everybody seems to think that such a law exists because it seems to be required to conduct even the simplest business. For example, everybody believes that a social security number is required for employment, banking, credit, insurance and even driver’s license - but there is no law that makes such requirements. In fact, there are many laws that prohibit requiring a social security number and several of these laws allow you to collect civil damage of $10,000 from people who violate your rights.



Did you know these important facts?



· The law protects employers from the IRS penalties when they do not collect social security numbers from employees.



· Employers cannot make payroll deductions for taxes when they do not have an employee’s social security number.



· That neither the IRS nor the Social Security Administration collect taxes from people who do not have or use a social security number.



· More than 7,000,000 natural born American adults do not have social security numbers.



· It is illegal for most government agencies to deny you rights, services or privileges because you refuse to give them a social security number. (You do need a social security number to collect social security benefits or welfare payments.)



· The military is prohibited from using a social security number as the military ID without your explicit permission.



· It is against the law for employers or government agencies to give a social security number to somebody else without your explicit permission.


&


<FONT size=4>I know of at least 3 cases, aside from the above, where employers were sued for amounts ranging from $2000 to $12,000 for terminating an employee for not providing a social security number. </FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>So I am now asking you again, what is your position on this issue? Will you comply with the Law? and allow me to continue working for the franchise? Will you support me in this? Or will you continue to be uncooperative? After researching this,&will you&stand up for your employees rights?&Or&will I see you in court? You can at least let me know that when I provide you with my information, you will support me in this, and follow the Law. I would like to know your position before I provide you with the information you want. If you, as a representative of the corporation, are unwilling to stand up for the rights of those working to make the corporation/franchise a productive and lucrative venture, then why should I bother providing you my information?</DIV>
<DIV>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;& gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt ;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;& gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>His response:</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Paul,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I stated previously and as I will continue to state, until you provide us the requested information we can not assist you because we do not know who to talk to about your situation.& If you would like our help, please provide this information so we can move forward.& That is my position and it will continue to be my position.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Keith Clark</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>SVP - Corporate Development</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>General Counsel</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>My reply to him:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=902424713-12042004>
<DIV>Keith,</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Thank you for your response. At least let me know if you are familiar with the Law that I speak of. I hope that you are a man of your word. I understand you may be "afraid" to put such a thing in writing. After all, if you're an "attorney" your first duty is to the court. Though you would be fully within your right to lawfully do so without repurcussion of any kind. When a worker does not provide such a number, as you may have seen if you have researched, there is a $50 fine from the IRS, ONLY if you have the number on file and have refused to provide it. The only "duty" your franchise owner has is to request the number, not&obtain it. The "fine" is waived upon presentment of a simple affidavit stating that the employer&requested the number, and the worker did not provide it. If you want me to provide the specific citation, I can.</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>From what I understand, you already know who I am and where I am. After all, "corporate home office" are the ones who gave the franchise owner here the advice to terminate me, and were the ones I was directed to regarding the issue. At least according to the owner.</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>If you want me to sign a W-4, fine. However, I find the inventorying of human flesh to be repugnant. It goes against my religious/spiritual beliefs.</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>the last thing I want to do is to cause either one of us any problems. I simply want to work and cover my bills. </DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Sincerely,</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>paul
</DIV></SPAN></DIV></DIV>


&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;


His response:
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Paul,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004>& <FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>It is not the corporate office's policy to advise franchisees to fire their employees.& The operations of franchised units, and particularly issues related to employment matters, are handled by the franchisees.& They are independently owned and operated restaurants.& </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004>& <FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>As I have stated before, since I don't know who you are or where you worked you need to provide this information before we can speak to the owner about this situation.& Unless and until you provide this information, there is nothing I can do.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Keith Clark</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>My reply:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=277524515-12042004>
<DIV>Hi Keith,</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>A few days ago I suggested the owner give you all a call. Coincidentally, your office called his franchise the day I was in there while I was there&and asked him&for a $500 donation for the Bush Administration, and told him he was being overtaxed.</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Has he contacted your office yet?</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Thank you,</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Paul</DIV>
<DIV>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;& gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt ;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>His response:</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=710090922-15042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I don't know anything about Bush Administration donations, but I don't think we solicite for political campaigns.& I have not spoken to any franchisees the last few days.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=710090922-15042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=710090922-15042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Does this mean you are declining to provide the requested information?& I'm not going to play e-mail tag forever.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=710090922-15042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=710090922-15042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</FONT></SPAN></DIV></DIV></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV>My reply:</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>No, it does not. </DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Do you have a number that I can provide to the owner of the franchise where he can contact you?
</DIV>


&


&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;


<FONT color=#0000ff>Him:</FONT>


<FONT color=#0000ff>corporate number is 469-384-5000.& Of course, if he is a franchisee he already knows that.</FONT>


&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;


Me:
<DIV>Thank you, Keith. I will make sure he gets this and ask him to call. I have already asked him to call corporate counsel on more than one occasion. Either he did or didn't, I don't really know. All I know is he said he was told by corporate to discontinue my employment if I was not enumerated with an ssn. On the day I worked for three hours, I was asked to fill out tax forms. I asked if I could bring them home and fill them out and then return them the following day. I was told I could. Then when I was let go I was told I had to have an ssn to work there and to come back when I have one. All I want to do is to work, trade my labor for cash. I have no objection to filling out forms. If it is law that I must have an ssn to trade labor for cash I would like for that Law to be supplied to me, please. Everything I have read says quite the opposite. I am merely trying to follow the Law of our Father. If being enumerated is what is required for employment with your company, please share that policy with me and I will be willing to consider it (under protest as it is violating my right to religious belief). At the same time, the card is only one part of "the mark" and I do not want to pass up a good job if it means I will starve to death.</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Take care,</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>paul
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>Him:</DIV>
<DIV>&</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>For what&will be the last time:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004>& <FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>1.& You don't work for my company as you claim below.& According to you, you formerly worked for a franchisee who chose to fire you for reasons which can not be determined because you repeatedly refused my requests for you to advise us who you work for so we can talk to them.</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004>& <FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>2. If you have not provided us with your name and your employers name by monday I will consider this matter closed at your request and will stop communications with you until you do so.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>We have extended every opportunity for you to receive our help, but you have steadfastly refused it.& There is nothing more we can do until you choose to cooperate.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>So now I walked down to the franchise and provided this fellow's number to the owner and asked him to call the fellow.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>When I spoke to him today, and another time earlier this week, he was trying to say he didn't fire me for not having a number (which is the reason he stated when he sent me walking). He said it was because I wouldn't fill out the tax forms. Which is untrue. I was told I could take those home and fill them out and bring them back the next day. So he's attempting to change his story. He also was trying to talk like I was never hired, saying he "didn't hire me because I wouldn't fill out the forms." </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>All this over a MINIMUM WAGE JOB!!</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>Perhaps I should just give up on this. I'm getting quite discouraged. The franchise already hired someone else in my stead. He said he talked to the IRS about it and they want me to fill out some form, which he said he's going to try to get, and then if he ever needs anyone, I"ll be "the first one he hires." I have electric and internet bills to pay and could have had the money a long time ago had I just given in on this one thing. I don't want to be identified with this number any longer, however, I'm finding it very difficult to get by without using it. After all, if and when I go to apply for a driver's license (which I was told I needed to for another job at a hardware store) I would need to supply the strawman's number for that as well, even though it says right on these cards "not for identification" or something to that effect. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>I have great respect for all of you freedom fighters out there who are actually making a difference in this country. I sure would love to be able to do the same. Obviously my knowledge of the required weaponry is lacking.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>Freedom, Love and Peace to you all! Keep fighting the Good Fight!</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>goldphoenix</FONT></SPAN></DIV></DIV>
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-18-2004, 08:59 PM
jmunson
 
Posts: n/a
Re:ssn and right to work



goldphoenix,


i applaud your tenacity.


if you have documented fact (evidence, especially third-party witness) of the no-hire for lack of ssn, then sue the company.& knowing what you know you can win.


they are playing games behind your back.


attorneys &amp; the "justice" system are somewhat in bed with the IRS, until you pull back the covers on them...


i'd never get an ssn if i didn't have one already (since i was 14/15 years of age, also told the same BS - "you need it to work..."; truth is, you only need it if you wish to pay taxes! )...


jon
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-18-2004, 10:14 PM
goldphoenix's Avatar
goldphoenix goldphoenix is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 199
Re:ssn and right to work



goldphoenix, i applaud your tenacity. if you have documented fact (evidence, especially third-party witness) of the no-hire for lack of ssn, then sue the company.& knowing what you know you can win. they are playing games behind your back. attorneys &amp; the "justice" system are somewhat in bed with the IRS, until you pull back the covers on them... i'd never get an ssn if i didn't have one already (since i was 14/15 years of age, also told the same BS - "you need it to work..."; truth is, you only need it if you wish to pay taxes! )... jon


&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;


Thankyou, Jon. The only witnesses were the manager and other workers there.


Even if there is an ssn you use, it is not yours, it is the governments (strawmans), or at least that is how I understand it. To me there is no difference between a man who has a strawman with a social security number and one who doesn't. Religious freedom is an unalienable right. Whether one's strawman has acquired the number or not is, to me, not the point. The point is if the use of that number is spiritually objectionable to the sovereign. I have not always believed what I do now. I believe that even a man whose strawman was assigned the number should have the right to avoid using/disclosing that number.


Does anyone agree or disagree with that idea?


peace,


goldphoenix
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-19-2004, 12:45 AM
Ice's Avatar
Ice Ice is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,866
Re:ssn and right to work



Yep... scroll down this thread to see some of my comments:


http://www.suijuris.net/main/suijuri...;showtopic=279


Ice
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-19-2004, 07:21 AM
Randy
 
Posts: n/a
Re:ssn and right to work



Quote:
Originally Posted by goldphoenix
<SPAN class=159525917-16042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>I have great respect for all of you freedom fighters out there who are actually making a difference in this country. I sure would love to be able to do the same. Obviously my knowledge of the required weaponry is lacking.</FONT></SPAN>



Paul,


You're the one worthy of everyone's respect, and you sure have mine! It's not about "winning" (defined only as having OUR way). It's about standing up for what you believe AND being willing to suffer the consequences.


You're fighting fear,&ignorance, and&brute force. It's the stuff of "true" battles, that of the "one" versus the "many."


More truth than humor in the old saying "Never under estimate the&power of stupid people in large groups."


My introduction into all this was the same as yours: Terminated after almost 13 years&with same employer for&"requesting"&employer to NOT withhold income tax. That led to a battle with the Virginia Employment Commission over unemployment compensation. (Employer initially agreed to the compensation, then--in open violation of state law--changed his&mind, appealed, and WON. Two years of appeals and I still had to repay the money.)


The tragedy is that men of honor and integrity, such as yourself, have to suffer at the hands of fools who possess only money and power.


Don't fall into the trap of thinking this so-called "patriot movement" is an all-or-nothing thing. It's not. (I resent the label of "patriot movement," simply because "patriot" implies an acceptance of,&and allegiance to, this country and the way it IS, not the way it's "supposed" to be. Personally, I loathe everything about the way it "is," and what all of us are fighting for is the way it is "supposed" to be. So, me? I'm "anti-patriot.")


Accept that the "secret" to agents' power is to be found in your experience: The use of the very noble characteristics of a man who wants nothing more than to enjoy the rights associated with his own life. Agents deal in usually unspoken ultimatums: Do this or else!


I don't like ultimatums. Cost me that job I mentioned. With hindsight, I sometimes think I might do things differently. My experience, however, serves only to convince me that it is still true that everything that happens does happen for a reason and that, sooner or later, things always do "work out for the best."


So approach these matters from the viewpoint of expediency. (I've not used the word "compromise" is decades, and never will use it again. It's an evil word and means simply "you lose, they win." Think only of its medical meaning: "The patient's condition has been compromised.")& I.E., don't "compromise" your principles, values, and ideals.


But accept the reality that it is indeed expedient that you, well, work. If you have to sign a dumbass w-4, sign it. Give yourself 9 exemptions/withholding thingies. Perfectly legal. And you'll bring home 100 per-cent of your pay.


THEN you can continue the fight. After all, you will have already begun your personal war with a demonstration of "good faith," right?& Having started there, the rest is a process of "due diligence," i.e., slowly and methodically developing your "affirmative defense."


One "battle" at a time is enough for any man, right?


Nothing but the best to you, Paul. If you need anything, please don't hesitate to say so. E-mail me if you need to. Remember: Agents win because THEY stick together. Time for us to start doing the same.


Randy
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-19-2004, 01:26 PM
ThinkingWolf's Avatar
ThinkingWolf ThinkingWolf is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 42
Re:ssn and right to work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy



But accept the reality that it is indeed expedient that you, well, work. If you have to sign a dumbass w-4, sign it. Give yourself 9 exemptions/withholding thingies. Perfectly legal. And you'll bring home 100 per-cent of your pay.




Do you mean specific to the "minimum wage" reference? My 11 exemptions don't give me close to 100%... perhaps I misunderstand.&
__________________
Anything is possible with the proper training.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer