Cracking The Code is Successful!

[David Merrill]

I certainly admire Peter Hendrickson for his pioneering work with the tax codes and his book. If ever I get back into the system I will be reading it carefully.

Meanwhile I enjoy putting the question before the Quatloos mentality. This time I presented the question on a poll.

http://www.quatloos.com/TaxForums/vi....php?t=1003198


Enjoy,

David Merrill.

The current Internal Revenue Code is about as close to legislated chaos as could ever be envisioned. No two people beginning with identical premises will reach the same conclusion under the IRC. Is not that chaos? Thus, in every instance where the government attempts to use oaths to bind a people, the result has been chaos.

Hence, this writer is forced to the conclusion that Jesus was right. We ought to avoid oaths at all costs, save our own souls, and for precisely that reason. Yet, what system of societal interaction Jesus envisioned, without oaths, escapes me. How would we deal with murderers, thieves, rapists, etc. present in the society without someone bringing a complaint, sworn complaint, before a Jury (a panel of sworn men), to punish them for these criminal actions against the civil members of that society? Perhaps you, the reader, can envision what Jesus had in mind. Even if you can’t, you still have to obey His command. That will set you free. As to where we go from there, well, given that there has never been a society, neither civil nor martial, which functioned without oaths, I guess we won’t see how it will function until it arrives.

Meanwhile, the first step in the process is abolishing your prior FALSE claims of being under oath (of office) on those income tax forms. You claimed "jurisdiction." Only you can reverse that by stating the Truth. It worked 400 years ago. It’ll still work. It’s the only thing that’ll work. History can repeat, but this time without the penalty of treason extended to you (or your daughters). You can cause it. Know and tell this Truth and it will set you free. HONESTLY. Tell the government, then explain it to every Christian you know. Most of them will hate you for that bit of honesty. Be kind to them anyhow. Once they see that you are keeping what you earn, the market will force them to realize that you aren’t the extremist they originally thought! If only 2% of the American people understand what is written here, income taxation will be abolished - that out of a fear that the knowledge will expand. The government will be scared silly. What if no one in the next generation would swear an oath? Then there’d be no servants! No, the income tax will be abolished long before that could ever happen. That’s only money. Power comes by having an ignorant people to rule. A government will always opt for power. That way, in two or three generations, the knowledge lost to the obscure "between the lines" of history, they can run the same money game. Pass this essay on to your Christian friends. But save a copy. Will it to your grandchildren. Someday, they too will probably need this knowledge. Teach your children well. Be honest; tell the truth. That will set you free - and it’ll scare the government silly.[/QUOTE



Even the Hebrews didn't leave Egypt right away. God had to inflict a little pain on Egypt first. Also, the Hebrew people left with all the gold and silver.When someone starts down a road there are stops along the way.

[David Merrill]

I agree with you about oaths. Not only did Jesus command it, there is strong indication that negation of the oath-taking process is the only change he authorized in the Torah - the law.

How would we deal with murderers, thieves, rapists, etc. present in the society without someone bringing a complaint, sworn complaint, before a Jury (a panel of sworn men), to punish them for these criminal actions against the civil members of that society?

This is just my vision but in the kingdom of heaven on earth there will be no need for a sworn complaint or swearing in the jurists. Why make the plaintiff or jurists disobey the new rule of the kingdom?

Some perspective may be gained from the Gospel of Thomas. My favorite version was found in a cave about 1950 and was translated independently of previous snippets. It begins:

And He said: Whoever finds the explanation of these words will not taste death. Jesus said: Let him who seeks, not cease seeking until he finds, and when he finds, he will be troubled, and when he has been troubled, he will marvel and he will reign over the All. "Jesus said: If those who lead you say to you: "See, the Kingdom is in heaven", then the birds of the heaven will precede you. If they say to you: "It is in the sea", then the fish will precede you. But the Kingdom is within you and it is without you. If you will know yourselves, then you will be known and you will know that you are the sons of the Living Father. But if you do not know yourselves, then you are in poverty and you are poverty. Jesus said: The man old in days will not hesitate to ask a little child of seven days about the place of Life

I call that capital integration; resolving the identity crisis between your true name and the legal name suggested on a bank note called Birth Certificate.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[fulltitle]

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
There was a time long ago where I wondered if there were "old style" or "de jure" courts hidden somewhere in a certain part of the court house. I was rather young at the time. Then one day I realized...that like maybe I am the court...we are the court. Kingdom of Heaven isn't something you wait to go to when the put you six feet under. See Ephesians 1 and 2 and then read through and comprehend the high vantage point and high rank from which we fight with our non-carnal weapons.

Apparently, that's the kind of revelation that I've found gets some of the the so-called 'religious folk' all in a frenzy.

I once suggested that people among the congregation stop going to worldly courts and carrying out court sessions as per Corinthians. Those people that seemed to be "true Christians": suddenly they were in a stir.

[See the letter to the Corinthians.]

[AndyK]

The Justice Department announced today that, in a nationwide crackdown against a tax-fraud scheme promoted by Peter Eric Hendrickson of Commerce Township, Mich., it has brought suit against nine people this week. According to the government complaints, filed in seven lawsuits across the country, the nine people-including Hendrickson and his wife Doreen M. Hendrickson-have received a total of nearly $150,000 in erroneous tax refunds by submitting false forms with their federal tax returns to replace W-2 and 1099 forms that correctly reported their income.

In seven suits filed in U.S. district courts in California, Nevada, Michigan, Alabama, Florida and Kansas, the Justice Department seeks to recover the erroneous refunds. In addition, the suit against Hendrickson, filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, asks the court to enjoin him from filing false tax forms and returns. A violation of the injunction would be punishable as contempt of court.

Celebrating Pete's successes may have been somewhat premature.

Originally Posted by AndyK

Celebrating Pete's successes may have been somewhat premature.

yeah yeah, Shut up and post your source, as requested.

Quatlooser.

Henry Franklin

[Admin]

Bowman, please respect our users.

[AndyK]

Originally Posted by HenryBowman

yeah yeah, Shut up and post your source, as requested.

Quatlooser.

Henry Franklin

http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/txdv06219.htm

You're welcome

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by AndyK

http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/txdv06219.htm

You're welcome

Thanks again.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Logan

I just received this email and wanted to share.

http://www.losthorizons.com/tax/MoreVictories.htm


Applying the tax code and definitions as written, results in most domestic income being non-taxable.

P.S. Larken's case is coming soon. Another victory, perhaps?

I have been receiving the emails for quite some time. I know people who are exercising the principles espoused by Peter Hendrickson. While I do not feel he is lying about these Refunds, I will not buy into Internet Yarn on principle alone. I know for a fact in other words that Cracking the Code does not work based in conventional rules of evidence. If Peter Eric were to take me up on that challenge by putting somebody in contact with me to prove his claim, then I would presume that client of his a shill (a planted testimonial) until they showed me the documents themselves. And maybe even then...

I am still of the impression as before that ignorant agents processing these Returns violate the process and send the standard "frivolous" forms. And when the agent is doubtful enough to send it to attorneys, the process works. However the testimony I believe is that there are problems compounded between the State and Federal revenue agencies. That is to say that even when Federal acknowledges $0 taxable income, the State will proceed upon different testimony even though the State is to base the liability solely on the Federal amount due.

Which as I understand it is the cornerstone of Peter Eric's system. One is absolutely entitled to be heard and in doing so your testimony overrides all other testimony, even an employer's.


Regards,

David Merrill.