Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Taxation
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-20-2004, 10:40 PM
Randy
 
Posts: n/a
Constitutional question



The Constitution is quite clear: It is the Legislative Branch, i.e., Congress, which has the power to lay and collect taxes, right?


The IRS is, of course, an "office" within the Treasury Dept., and the Treasury Dept. is part of the Executive Branch.


If the IRS' job is to "administer and enforce the tax laws," and part of that includes "collection," isn't the wrong branch of government collecting taxes?


Or am I missing something? Which is possible, you know.


Thanks.


Randy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-20-2004, 11:52 PM
Tora
 
Posts: n/a
Re:Constitutional question

<DIV>


By D.J. Logan


The IRS is not who you think they are they are. IRS agents are neither trained nor paid by the United Stated Government.


Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 92, the IRS is trained under the direction of the Division of Human Resources (U.N.) and the Commissioner (INTERNATIONAL), by the office of Personnel Management.


In the 1979 edition of 22 USCA 278, "The United nations," you will find Executive Order 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under the direction of the Secretary of the United Nations.


Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91, the IRS entered into a "Service Agreement" with the US Treasury Department (See Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967, Reorganization (BANKRUPTCY!!!) Plan No. 26) and the Agency for International Development. This agency is an international paramilitary operation and, according to the Department of the Army Field manual (1969) 41-10, pgs 1-4, Sec. 1-7 (b) &amp; 1-6. Sec. 1-10 (7) (c) (1), and 22 USCA 284, includes such activities as, "Assumption of full or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area."


The IRS is also an agency/member of a 169 nation pact called the International Criminal Police Organization, or INTERPOL, found at 22 USCA 263a. The memorandum of Understanding, (MOU), between the Secretary of Treasury, AKA the corporate governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank" (International Monetary Fund, and the International Bank for reconstruction and Development), indicated that the Attorney General and her associates are soliciting and collecting information for foreign principals; the international organizations, corporations, and associations, exemplified by 22 USCA 286f.


According to the 1994 US Government Manual, at page 390, the Attorney General is the permanent representative to INTERPOL, and the Secretary of Treasury is the alternate member. Under Article 30 of the INTERPOL constitution, these individuals must expatriate their citizenship. They serve no allegiance to the United States of America. The IRS is paid by "The Fund" and "The Bank."


Thus it appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Sevice agents are "Agents of a Foreign Principle" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938" for private, not public, gain.


The IRS is directed and controlled by the corporate Governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank." The Federal Reserve Bank and the IRS collection agency are both privately owned and operated under private statutes. The IRS operates under public policy, not Constitutional Law, and in the interest of our nations foreign creditors.


The Constitution only permits Congress to lay and collect taxes. It does not authorize Congress to delegate the tax collection power to a private corporation, which collects our taxes for a private bank, the Federal Reserve, who then deposits it into the Treasury of the IMF.


The IRS is not allowed to state that they collect taxes for the United States Treasury. They only refer to "The Treasury."


PC magazine reported that the Clinton Administration lawyers are preparing executive orders to connect ALL private bank accounts and banking cards directly to the IRS, Treasury and Federal Reserve Computers.


"A society of sheep must, in time, beget a government of wolves." -- Bertrand de Juvenal.


The End!


<FONT size=-1></FONT>&</DIV>
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2004, 05:40 AM
Randy
 
Posts: n/a
Re:Constitutional question



Understood. And all two of us agree.


Next question becomes:


I can't find one single reference, anywhere, of this being made an issue to the IRS or as a court challenge.


I.E., it's a big "proof" for me that the IRS hasn't been faced with this because this very obvious and simple fact, and truth, hasn't made the IRS "frivolous argument" list.


Randy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Text of public law 73-10 kgod999 UCC 87 02-11-2008 08:30 AM
Contractor's licenses?? Rory Success Stories 243 01-15-2008 05:56 AM
NO LICENSE - PERFECTED LEGAL ARGUEMENT Akira Travel 90 09-27-2006 12:35 PM
From The Archives SKYGZR Taxation 0 07-10-2004 02:20 AM
Transcript of Bush/Cheney Testimony Before 9/11 Commission suijuris Misc. Discussion 3 04-30-2004 04:13 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:42 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer