Irwin Shiff in JAIL

[charlesa6]

Originally Posted by Admin

Skeptic, I think your post merits a reply from my man Gandhi.

“Man should forget his anger before he lies down to sleep.”


Nobody is perfect Skeptic, all of us on this site are just trying to live our lives in peace and figure out what the meaning of all this injustice is.

Thanx, admin, I hope people get it to their head, and understand that no body is perfect. That is part of work of life. Cubbish!

[mrg]

Originally Posted by bridge of sighs

Title 27 CFR 70.11 Meaning of terms. Enforced Collection. Collection of taxes when a taxpayer neglects or refuses to pay voluntarily. Includes such administrative measures as liens and levies.

Caveat viator:

(Do not try to use this stuff in "court" without the guidance of a licenced professional, willing to really re-present you)

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:...n t=firefox-a

http://www.enter.net/~arthurlf/incomet/26v27cfr.htm

http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/s...rs030201-t.htm

http://www.atgpress.com/inform/tx067.htm

http://www.worldnewsstand.net/law/nol.shtml

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/erath/injunction.htm

http://www.tax-freedom.com/IRSTRUTH.html

http://www.freedomdomain.com/sovereignty/inform30.html

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:...ient=firefox-a




Code of Federal Regulations
Title 27 -- Alcohol, Tobacco Products and Firearms


* I ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX AND TRADE BUREAU, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
* II BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/cfr.php?title=27


TITLE 27 USC—INTOXICATING LIQUORS
Release date: 2005-08-31
# CHAPTER 1—GENERAL PROVISIONS
# CHAPTER 2—PROHIBITION OF INTOXICATING BEVERAGES
# CHAPTER 2A—BEER, ALE, PORTER, AND SIMILAR FERMENTED LIQUOR
# CHAPTER 3—INDUSTRIAL ALCOHOL
# CHAPTER 4—PENALTIES
# CHAPTER 5—PROHIBITION REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1930
# CHAPTER 6—TRANSPORTATION IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE
# CHAPTER 7—LIQUOR LAW REPEAL AND ENFORCEMENT ACT
# CHAPTER 8—FEDERAL ALCOHOL ADMINISTRATION ACT
# CHAPTER 9—LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 1936
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...sup_01_27.html


TITLE 26 USC—INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
Release date: 2005-08-31
# Subtitle A—Income Taxes
# Subtitle B—Estate and Gift Taxes
# Subtitle C—Employment Taxes
# Subtitle D—Miscellaneous Excise Taxes
# Subtitle E—Alcohol, Tobacco, and Certain Other Excise Taxes
# Subtitle F—Procedure and Administration
# Subtitle G—The Joint Committee on Taxation
# Subtitle H—Financing of Presidential Election Campaigns
# Subtitle I—Trust Fund Code
# Subtitle J—Coal Industry Health Benefits
# Subtitle K—Group Health Plan Requirements
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/h...sup_01_26.html


Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR)
BETA TEST SITE

e-CFR Data is current as of March 29, 2006
Title 26
Internal Revenue
Internal Revenue Service,
Department of the Treasury
http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text...6/26tab_02.tpl

[Levi Philos]

Irwin Schiff's Great Giveaway Program:
http://www.paynoincometax.com/great_giveaway.htm

Get all of Irwin Schiff's powerful information below for Free - No charge!

Irwin's been helping us, and now it's time to help him. If he's successful in reversing his conviction, all American's will benefit! We must not let this illegal conviction stand. All contributions will help. Whatever you can send would be greatly appreciated! Please send your generous, "tax deductible" contribution by putting "Irwin Schiff Defense" in the memo area of your check and on the attention line of your envelope, and send to:

We The People Foundation
2458 Ridge Road
Queensbury, NY 12804

Read "The Federal Mafia" for FREE

Read "The Lien and Levy Kit" for FREE

Read "The Summary Transcript" for FREE

Download the "Tax Court Toolkit" for FREE

The Secrets of Living an Income Tax Free Life by Irwin Schiff

Irwin Schiff speaks out on the war


Backyard Role Play; (go to site for live links)

Series 4, Series 5, Series 6, Series 7

[Bulletproof Monk]

I think there are enough threads on this site that clearly explain who the strawman is, and that you are the agent, unless you agree otherwise. Yes you are the third party to a govt created fiction, legal entity.

Just do a search here.

Signing anything, where the info is going into a computer, you must always sign as Agent, 10 out of 10 times guaranteed, it will be entered in ALL CAPS because, and I keep saying this, corporations and entities can only do business with other entities..they need to transform you into a commercial person.

Most important is the seperation. His present-ment was in the strawman name, not his.

Also, you can't go into a fictitious court-bank and argue their laws with liars involved and expect to walk out...it's wonderland in there, anything goes, especially when you've handed over your rights and juristiction.

Rebutt the presumptions, that's the only way to go, and of course SMJ...

He could have simply filed "no recourse" no lawful money in circulation, but he was doing the wrong thing by enriching himself and giving leeeegal advice to people for profit.

Also Acceptance..he was in major dishonor...you must stay in acceptance. Accept for value, return without dishonor.

It's not the theory that was the fault, it was the method, and they're two different things.

No wonder he's in jail.

Remember, the burden of proof lies on the plaintiff...he was the plaintiff/arguer/contemptuous one.

Bulletproof

[Codee]

Originally Posted by Bulletproof Monk

Signing anything, where the info is going into a computer, you must always sign as Agent, 10 out of 10 times guaranteed, it will be entered in ALL CAPS because, and I keep saying this, corporations and entities can only do business with other entities..they need to transform you into a commercial person.

Then why am I allowed to do Buisiness with the strawman?

[Bulletproof Monk]

Originally Posted by Codee

Then why am I allowed to do Buisiness with the strawman?

Because you're it's agent (if you've agreed to be) or fallguy as in most cases where people didn't realise...again SMJ...only you have it.

You can't do business in another strawman name..

BP

[Codee]

What I am asking and implying is if other companies can only do buisiness with other fictions... why do they not have agents that are men that can do buisiness directly with you.

I will let on that I agree... However I think of the term "Natural person" and think this is a persona that exists naturally because a man or woman exists. NOw because "THIS" natural persona exists because of me it is still in the mind... a fiction, an animal cannot see it, but it is also NATURALLY mine. This Naturallity means I can have dominion over this idea. It is a NATURAL trademark. It acts as an ADDRESS and an ID. It is mine that which every man needs and must control in order to persue happiness. A natural persona is not a curse. It is the very means by which we transact ALL buisiness. It is your tool. It is GOOD. It is yours to use but is not you. You is what happens when you think on yourself. Your persona is what types stuff on SuiJuris.

The Natural person is the strawman and the strawman in UPPERCASE is the systems way of differentiating between the "id" and the "person."

The punishment however will be corporal.

[Codee]

Originally Posted by Bulletproof Monk

Because you're it's agent (if you've agreed to be) or fallguy as in most cases where people didn't realise...again SMJ...only you have it.

You can't do business in another strawman name..

BP

SMJ????? Now we are flirting.

[cz3000]

I have been in court and been 'told' by the maggot i mean magistrate that "No, you cannot be here in your proper person". Of course I rejected that offer.
It is interesting to note that corporations cannot defend or bring suit unless represented by an attorney.
This is pretty much standard business law in most places.

[Codee]

What is a proper person?