Taxation Discuss Taxation (IRS, Real Estate Taxes, Car Taxes, etc.).


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Taxation
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-25-2006, 02:12 PM
freeindeed freeindeed is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 457
Chuck Conces, the latest

Here is the latest. Just received this in an email.

Quote:
The Department of Justice press release can be found at http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/txdv06243.htm

The Department of Justice has also published the court opinion at http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/Conces_Opin...faultJudg).pdf and the order of the court at http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/Conces_Orde...lt%20Judg).pdf

The permanent injunction also requires Chuck Conces to turn his client list (with names, addresses, and Social Security numbers) over to the IRS.

And then I got this.

Quote:
This was a follow-up comment on the message board……..

Conces was not in court cause he refused to participate in the sham procedings. He filed a brief on 3/20/06 listing his issues with the judge and the proceedings. He repeatedly asked How and what agent he interfered with. Of course no anwser. He also wanted to see the judges oath of office---which was never produced. He also claims the judge removed from the record somethings that would be extreamly damageing to the Gov. case.
Reminds me of the retired Navy officer who was convicted of interfering because he wrote a letter to his bank telling them they better be damn sure any liens given to them where done correctly and whith proper athority. Ive read some of the court docs. Conces uses the Supreme court cite where they say we the people have the responsibility to make sure the gov agents have the authority to do what they say they can do. Like file liens. So in legal land its "interfereing" when you point out to the county clerk the laws regarding fileing of liens.
I love this one “there need not be a showing that a party has violated a particular Internal Revenue Code section in order for an injunction to issue.” United States v. Ernst & Whinney, 735 F.2d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 1984).

Last edited by freeindeed : 04-25-2006 at 02:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chuck Conces On The Line weishaupt1776 Service Providers 1 11-22-2005 10:41 PM
Latest from Alaska palani Service Providers 1 11-04-2005 06:57 PM
Witholding / Suing Employers weishaupt1776 Taxation 6 07-15-2005 04:56 PM
The latest on Quatloos iamfreeru2 Service Providers 4 06-07-2005 09:23 AM
The latest from "We the People" web site iamfreeru2 Taxation 2 05-22-2005 08:13 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:51 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer