Power of Appointment.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

UGA Lawdog is on my Ignore List.

http://www.quatloos.com/Tax-Forums/p...ewprofile&u=15

All the treasonous traitors are on my ignore list too, because they literally make me want to puke bile.

[squirrel]

I got this new book from my buddy, Top Jimmy. Its called Search and Seizure by John Wesley Hall, Jr.
And I'll tell ya, the more I read the more pissed off I get.
These treasonous traitors KNOW WHAT THEIR DOING !!

We need a REVOLUTION !!!
We need to hold these scumbags ACCOUNTABLE !!!!

[mikah2k]

....................

[squirrel]

A Few Words About The Bankruptcy Of The United States.


Newcomers into the modern patriotic movement often overlook the effect of U.S. bankruptcy. Americans have been taught since their youth that the government has an unlimited supply of money because all they have to do is print it. First of all, the government does not issue the federal reserve notes. A private banking cartel that holds the bankruptcy note on the United States (federal reserve board) issues those FRN’S and they are not money. The FRN’S are evidence of bad debt.

Every society has a means of protecting itself against people who habitually make bad debts. If someone that habitually defaults on his obligations offers to buy your house or your business, you have a right of having protection against that individual taking your property and selling it to others without paying for it. In the United States, the remedy is called “Bankruptcy”. Society protects itself by disabling the incompetent person’s legal rights for managing their own affairs. All management of that person’s affairs is placed in the hands of a “receiver in bankruptcy” or a “bankruptcy trustee.” The bankrupt individual or business may not acquire, hold, or convey title to any property, real or personal, without permission from the bankruptcy trustee. The legally disabled person has no more charge over his or her own affairs. The bankrupt person may not buy, sell, or hold a job without permission from the bankruptcy trustee.

Doesn’t the description of bankruptcy sound suspiciously like the description of the effect of taking the “Mark of the Beast” in the book of Revelations?

When the United States publicly admitted Bankruptcy on March 9, 1933, the bankruptcy trustee for all United States property became the person known as the “Secretary of the Treasury.” The title “Secretary of the Treasury” was abolished in the mid 1940’s and the title was changed to “United States Governor of [meaning, on behalf of] the International Monetary Fund.” All property and business of the U.S. Government is under the direct control of, not Congress, but the un-elected Secretary of the Treasury.

Every “state” in the United States is participating in the repayment of Washington, DC’s debt. I recommend that all people obtain a recent copy of their state budget. You will notice that a deposit was made into a thing called a “Trust Fund.” Usually there is very little else in the Title to describe this fund. It may even be called by another name. ALWAYS, there are deposits, but NEVER are there any withdrawals. These funds are the state’s share of the U.S. bankruptcy payments.

WHAT DOES ALL THIS ABOUT BANKRUPTCY HAVE TO DO WITH ME ?

The way that the states levy and collect the funds for deposit into the “trust fund” is through license/user fees and through fines for infraction of statutory edict. These fines cannot be levied upon anyone not owing the debt, because that would be unfair. The fines, levies, user fees’ and licenses fees are all forms of “tax” as proven in John Freeman’s excellent brief on TRAVEL BY RIGHT, which is distributed by Gamaliel in annotated form, with commentary. The taxes are owed by the United States in order to pay off the debts of the bankruptcy. So, who is the United States ? Let’s look in the law books and see.

Title 4 USC, sec 71 and 72 limit the seat of the government of the United States to the ten miles square called Washington D.C. and stipulate that the jurisdiction of the United States may not exceed those boundaries except as expressly provided by law. Title 4 USC sec 104-113 are called the “Buck Act.” The Buck Act allows any Federal Agency [under the control of the Secretary of the Treasury] to draw lines within the geographical boundaries of any State and exercise jurisdiction over that geographic area. This is an end-run around Title 4 USC 71&72. When a person claims “residency” within these federal jurisdictions, they are claiming a responsibility for paying off the U.S. bankruptcy. Prima Facie evidence of residency can be as simple as using a zip code in your address.

A note is in order, here, about the usage of the words “Federal Agency” in the Buck Act. In Title 28 USC sec 3002(15) the term “United States” includes any federal corporation, federal agency, or instrumentality of the United States. The “Agency” that exercises jurisdiction under the Buck Act is the United States, by and through the Secretary of the Treasury, who is a wholly-owned, bought-and-paid-for, stoog for the International Monetary fund.

A legal “instrument” is any written document such as a contract, deed, or a lease. When your name is on an instrument called a Social Security Card, voter registration card, or drivers license, you are the instrumentality obligated by that instrument. Because you are the bankrupt United States, you have no right to buy, own, or use property. You are subject to taxation and regulation in the form of most traffic fines, user fees, licenses, and so forth. The REMEDY is the rescission of the contracts and instruments.




Blacks Law seventh edition.
Page 1189.
Power. 1. The ability to act or not to act. 2. Dominance, control, or influence over another. 3. The legal right or authorization to act or not act; the ability confered on a person by the law to alter, by an act of will, the rights, duties, liabilities, or other legal relations either of that person or of another. 4. A document granting legal authorization. See AUTHORITY. 5. An authority to affect an estate in land by (1) creating some estate independently of any estate that the holder of authority possesses, (2) Imposing a charge on the estate, or (3) revoking an existing estate. See POWER OF APPOINTMENT.

Page 1190.
Power of Appointment. A power conferred on a donee by will or deed to select and nominate one or more recipients of the donor's estate or income. -- Also termed enabling power.

Again, these are not my words, just transcribing from what I have at my desposil.
Read, investigate and come to your own conclusions.

[squirrel]

You will have to look up the laws in the state you live in by cross referencing from minnesota's 502.79.

[squirrel]

Motivation Theory

Most of us have heard about the carrot and stick approach to motivation. Let’s suppose that you are trying to get a donkey to pull a cart. Carrot and stick works like this: By tying a carrot to the and of a stick and holding the carrot in front of the donkey, he supposed to move in the direction you want him to pull the cart. The variables are: How juicy is the carrot ? How long is the stick ? How hungry is the donkey ?
An example of the carrot and stick approach among Christians can be found in Galatians 5:19-26 and Philippians 4:7-9. Whereas all excess income is taken away from SSN holders, they have a state guarantee that all elderly people will suffer equally until they die.

The Sovereign Citizens of God‘s jurisdiction, on the other hand, are blessed with the right to prosper to the limit of their abilities. Sovereigns are given very few and unchanging rules to live by. They are promised peace, joy and prosperity in this life and the next. From that point of view, being very hungry Sovereign‘s. That’s a very juicy carrot on a very short stick.
With these principles and idea’s in mind we can now look at man’s government and what the Bible says our attitude toward government should be.

A NOBLE EXPERIMENT THAT FAILED

Hosea 4:6

The founding fathers of America did their very best to give us a government that could guarantee us Liberty and keep us free, but even they could foresee failure. One of the founding fathers responded to the question, “What kind of government have you given us ?” with the answer “A Republic if you can keep it.” President John Adams said, “Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other.” President Andrew Jackson said, “The Bible is the Rock on which our Republic rest’s.” George Washington said, “The people know it is impossible to rightly govern without God and the Bible.” Daniel Webster said, “If we abide by the principles taught in the Bible, our country will go on prospering.”

In recent years, the media, the school systems, and even some people who call themselves patriots, have tried to get us to believe that the founding fathers of our nation were freethinkers, agnostics, and/or atheists. There are even some people within the “Patriot Movement” that are writing and lecturing that some of our founding fathers worshipped Lucifer (the Devil). When we take an objective look at the lives and writings of these men, we find that the vast majority of them were honest, God-fearing men. They gave us the best government that any men have ever created on the face of the Earth because that government was our servant, not our master. The Nation given to us by our founding fathers has not failed us, we have failed IT, by rejecting God and elevating our servant to the position of master.

God was certainly at work in the founding of our nation. The reasons, I believe, is because the Declaration of Independence, declaring that Mankind is endowed by his Creator with Rights, reversed the curse placed upon mankind in First Samuel 8:18. God was working among our forefathers, but the evil one was active, as well. There are two fatal flaws in the constitution that will become as obvious to the reader as it is to the writer. These flaws are in the giving of exclusive jurisdiction over Washington, DC to a body of men and the inclusion of unspecified, prior Treaties as the “Supreme Law of the Land.” These provisions were deliberately placed in the constitution by men that understood man’s weaknesses. We will discuss these flaws, and the remedy, for the rest of these writings.
The writers of the Universal Declaration (Declaration of Independence) recognized that God had endowed mankind with certain UNALIENABLE rights. The word was not “inalienable.” The word “inalienable” was not invented until long after 1776. Breaking down the prefixes, the root word, and the suffix of the word “unalienable,” we find “un-a-LIEN-able” (pronounced “un-uh-LIEN-able”, not “un-alien-able”). The root word is lien and the prefixes cause a negation of effectiveness. When these word-parts are so arranged as they are in “unalienable,” they create a word meaning, “a lien may not be placed against “ these rights.

These rights cannot be taken from us by act of law [Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 491]. Bouvier’s Law Dictionary defines “unalienable” as being a right that one person may not lawfully transfer to another, yet the word “consent” in Black’s Law Dictionary means a yielding of a right to someone else. Breaking down “unalienable” into its separate syllables showed us that where Bouvier’s definition used the word “lawfully,” they should have used the phrase “be compelled by law” to transfer to another.
To help define the rights of free men, the authors of the Declaration of Independence studied the Scriptures, therefore, for us to know our rights; WE must study the Bible, also. To find our proper relationship with the State and Federal Governments, we study the State and Federal Constitutions. In the U.S. Constitution, amendments 9 and 10, we learn that we have many rights not listed in the first eight amendments. Roe v. Wade was, essentially, a ninth amendment case. We also find the U.S. Government only has powers granted to it BY THE PEOPLE. The people granted no rights to the government. There are only twenty-two powers granted to the federal government. These are the so called “enumerated powers.” If the federal government has so little legal power, then why do I feel intimidated ? Where do they get the authority to run roughshod over my rights ? How could they get away with burning down the Branch Davidian church near Waco, Texas ? How could they assault the Weaver family on their own land in Idaho, killing a young mother and shooting her 14 year old son in the back ? How did they get away with Dropping a bomb on the MOVE church and burning down a whole city block ? We will find out how.

John Adams, the second president of the united States, said, “you have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislature of the Universe.” In the Constitution and other founding documents of the American Government, the government was never described as having rights. Rights are recognized as being given by God to mankind. The federal and state governments were given limited grants of power. All State Constitutions make the declaration that, “ all political power is inherent in the people.” We can therefore understand that the Federal and State Constitutions are limited grants of power, not declarations of God’s Seal of Authority on the rights of earthly governments to subjugate mankind ( a misrepresentation of Romans, Chapter 13).

In 1803 the supreme Court (it is interesting to note that in the Constitution, the word supreme is not capitalized, but Behavior is ! ) handed down a decision on a controversy between President James Madison and Mr. Marbury, a political appointee. The case cite is Marbury v. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803). In this decision, the supreme Court said, “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and viod.” It does not say, “All contracts and/or consent forms which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”

Another landmark case was Norton v. Shelby County found in 118 US 425. On page 442, the supreme Court decision said “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Any law that may have been passed that would interfere with our right to contract would be null and void. Our right to contract into the jurisdiction of the IRS, Social Security, and Washington DC is protected by the constitution.

In volume 16 of American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, sec 177 and 256 you will find “the general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.” and “No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” But the government is required to refrain from interfering in obligations of contracts.

[squirrel]

Thus we can see by the above supreme Court rulings, which have been overturned, and by the official rule book by which the laws of our country are interpreted, that the American Citizen enjoys the best protection of his God-given rights of any human on the face of this earth. Because most Americans no longer enjoy even the rights specified in the first eight amendments, then what is wrong with the Constitution ? What I have discovered, through pain, agony, financial strain, and research is that NOTHING is wrong ! SOVEREIGN Americans still have the same freedoms they have always had. No law prohibits our carrying fully automatic, military style weapons, concealed or in the open, on our person, or mounted on the roll bar of our jeep, on the streets of any city in the nation (except Washington DC).

No law requires us to pay income tax or social security taxes. No law requires us to seek permission (get a license) to freely use the public thoroughfares. No law prohibits our building any structure we wish without regard to “zoning ordinances” as long as we actually own the property. These rights have been voluntarily given up through contract, not taken from us by law. We get these rights back by going through the correct legal procedure to break the contracts. You can literally, Break the chains that bind you.

You wont see the words “contract” or “consent” mentioned anywhere in Marbury v. Madison, Norton v. Shelby County, Miranda v. Arizona, or in the above citation from 16 Am Jur 2nd. Because, as a Sovereign OVER the laws of this country, you are presumed to be intelligent enough to decide for yourself whether you wish to compromise one of your God-given rights in return for a benefit you are seeking in a contract. The limited powers that our forefathers gave to the government did NOT include impairing our right to contract [ Art 1 sec 10], because we are the Sovereigns and the government is our servant.

[squirrel]

By the time Americans are twenty-one years of age, most of them have signed literally hundreds of declarations that they are subject to the jurisdiction of Washington, D.C. (the incorporated city called the United States). When they get a little older and see how much uncontrolled power the IRS has, some of them rebel and join tax-protest groups. It is very short time between being officially identified as a “tax protestor” and the time when all of those declarations of U.S. citizenship come back to haunt you by biting a big chunk out of your bank account, if not actually putting you in jail. The IRS moves decisively against tax protestors.

Every once in a while, when court revenues drop off, someone is allowed to win a tax case by using some off the wall legal argument. Word gets around that this is how you win against the IRS and the fines, penalties, and court revenues skyrocket for the next few years because all of these contract-laden, bankrupt, subjects of the government come into court and argue LAW and the judge renders his decision based on the CONTRACTS they have signed. No matter what legal arguments you use, winning a suit against the IRS is a matter of pure luck, since contracts always supersede law. It sure gives the IRS the appearance of having a lot of legal power, though, doesn’t it ?

There is a section of the Internal Revenue Code called the “anti injunction act.” The anti injunction act states that you cannot appeal an assessment until after you have paid the tax. I asked an attorney about the anti-injunction act and he explained the logic behind the code in this manner, “if you owe a tax, you have to pay the tax. Regardless of what other tragedies may occur, you still must pay the tax. If you owe a debt, you must pay it.” When a person bound by the contract known as his Social Security Number contests and income tax assessment with legal arguments, it is the same as jumping through a second story window and saying, “I don’t want to fall.”

If a law is passed and someone breaks it, the person is punished. If someone signs a contract and does not perform up to the specifications of the contract, they are not punished; they are compelled to specific performance. That is the difference between law and contract. That is one way you can tell law and contract apart, - by the result of violating them. They punish you if you break a law but they force you to live up to your obligations (specific performance) if you violate a contract. The SS-5 form is only one of hundreds of sneaky little contracts you have signed granting federal jurisdiction over your person and property .

They ALL come back to bite you when you confront any governmental agency. By voiding all the contracts and NEVER asking for benefits, you pull all their teeth.

[squirrel]

More tomorrow.

[eyes wide open]

What exactly is a homestead act and how does it protect a home owner, also my mother has the loan but both of us are on the title and i make the payments since i can show i have made the payments all along can i have her removed from the loan?