Power of Appointment.

[squirrel]

I, Myself, do not know anything about the homestead act.

Sorry for the delay on the follow up post from saturday.

Most Americans “toe the line” for the IRS and other revenue collecting agencies out of confusion and fear. They know in their hearts that something “just isn’t right” about our liberties being gone, but they are confused because no seems to be able to explain exactly how we lost our rights or how to get them back. Readers’ Digest and TV pseudo-documentaries such as “60 minutes“ and “20/20“ (The fleecing of America) have carried segments on how the government is raking in millions of dollars in “civil forfeitures” and “administrative assessments” and how Citizens don’t have a prayer in the world of being granted a hearing on having the money returned.

Citizens seem to have no remedy, so the confusion begins to change into a little, nagging fear in the back of their minds. How can I possibly fight the State Police or the IRS when they have that much power ? The answer is this: All of the civil forfeitures and administrative assessments are contractual procedures. Yes, ALL of them. The civil forfeiture revenue game that is being played under the R.I.C.O. Act in the airports and on the highways is not played like it would first appear. They do know their target. If they were to pull me over for a roadside shakedown, because I am not in their computers, they would let me go. I have voided all my contracts and they have no means (other than terrorism) to compel performance. When a law enforcement situation becomes a little tense for members of the Sovereign community, we ask the policemen to radio their dispatcher for instructions. The dispatcher usually contacts a judge or a lawyer, who then instructs the police to turn us loose.

God is the author of freedom of choice. This freedom of choice is written into the U.S. Constitution in Article 1, sec 10 as, NO STATE SHALL PASS ANY LAW IMPAIRING THE OBLIGATION OF CONTRACTS.. A contract, therefore, is superior to law. When you sign your name, it is entirely possible to give up every God given right you ever had. There can be no such thing as a trivial contract. For the non-religious, there is the aspect of specific or substantial performance that can be required on all contracts. If a deeply religious individual were to tell you, “that’s just a technicality” you might remind him/her that a contract is an agreement to which he/her has given his word. To break his/her word is to lie. I cannot imagine how an individual who claims to be religious can knowingly have a Social Security Card, not pay what he/she owes to the IRS, and still believe that he/she is righteous.

If you work in a high tech industry, you have to sign a non-disclosure contract before you begin work or upon termination of employment. This contract prohibits you from disclosing trade secrets about your employer’s products and plans both while employed and for a stipulated period of time after you leave the company. If, during the time covered by the contract, you decide to earn a little extra cash by giving lectures and writing books on your employer’s trade secrets, you would most likely find yourself in court. If your “affirmative defense” against prosecution was your Constitutional right to free press or free speech, the judge would make quick work of you. The judge would want to know: did you sign the contract, did the company pay you as agreed, did you disclose information covered in the contract during the time covered by the contract. If your answers are “yes” then you will suffer the penalty stipulated in the contract.

[squirrel]

We will find that virtually ALL of our apparent “loss of liberty” and the “erosion of rights” have not come through law, but “bankruptcy regulations” or “contractual offers.” Since an unlimited right to contract would, necessarily, include the right not to contract, and since a contract is valid only if entered into intentionally, knowingly, and voluntarily then we are under no obligation to sign our name. A contract signed under duress is null and void. Either we did not have sufficient knowledge to retain our liberty and rights or we did not place a high enough value on our liberty and rights to make the effort to keep them. Which is it ??

No government can force you to contract with them. Can they force you to get a fishing license ? NO. You have to sign a contract to get a fishing license. The same goes for a drivers license and auto insurance. Can they restrict your right to go fishing for food for your table ?? NO. You have the right to life, liberty and property and, since you did not sign away that right in a fishing license contract, you have retained that right. The same goes for the free right to travel on the public thoroughfares. You have not given up that right by signing the contract for a drivers license. Since a coerced contract is invalid and you have not contracted away the rights, you are free. But does it really work ? Is this just another scam ? Yes, it works, and no, I am not scamming you. But it is very important how you go about asserting your rights, so keep reading.

What has happened in America is that the people have “rejected knowledge” and God has rejected them. Since Americans have forgotten the Law of God, he will also forget us and our children. Hosea 4:6 is the unadulterated truth. But is it any wonder that it looks as if our rights are being taken away ?? We have been tempted and seduced by government agencies and private corporations into contracting away the liberty that God wants US to enjoy. Luckily, God has promised us that with every temptation there will be a way of escape [First Corinthians 10:13].

The next thing we will do is explore a historical model predating our own loss of Sovereignty and see what we can do that is in harmony with the Bible and the laws of the land that will restore that lost Sovereignty.


Go to post 1.

[squirrel]

The dissolution of the monetary system created by the Bretton Woods Agreements can be traced to the early 1960's. The monetary system during this time made a de facto transition from a "gold standard" to a dollar standard . . . There were more dollars abroad than the U.S. had gold. The U.S. commitment to redeem international dollars for gold became a physical impossibility. The reality of dollar convertibility ended.

Necessitas non habet legem.


http://www.afn.org/~govern/why.html

[powder]

http://www.jamesrajotte.com/publicat...s/2002fall.pdf

Page 3

"Dear Mr. Prime Minister:

I am writing with regards to the power of appointment vested in the office of Prime
Minister, and its implications for the democratic nature of Canadian society."

[squirrel]

GREAT DEPRESSION, 3700 YEARS AGO

Genesis 47:13-26

When studying the Bible reference for this Chapter, you noticed in verse 13 that there was a famine brought on the land of Egypt. Until the time of the famine, the Egyptian farmers were free Sovereigns on their own land who paid no taxes. They owned their land and all that it produced.

In verse 14, we see a deliberately contrived depression caused by the drying up of the money supply. As was the Great Depression in the 1930’s, this one was deliberately caused by foreign interests and a greedy tyrant who acted in their own self-interest to accomplish their own agenda. It was done with the full knowledge and cooperation of the legitiment government. The depression was not caused by the famine. The depression was caused by Joseph and the Pharaoh deliberately drying up the money supply. After gathering up the money, in verse 16 Joseph says, “If money fail.” Now isn’t that just like a politician? He said this after he caused the money to be gathered up. Joseph and the Pharaoh used their foreknowledge of the famine to their benefit and to the people’s hurt. If the government had been of the people, by the people, and for the people, the government would have promoted the general welfare, but instead, there was insider trading.
Verse 15 finds the Egyptians turning to the Pharaoh (earthly government) in time of need instead of turning to God. Joseph had directed Pharaoh’s men to buy and store all surplus grain during the good years. What sort of advertising campaign did Pharaoh use to achieve what happened next? Franklin D. Roosevelt said, “If it happens in politics, you can be sure that it was planned that way.”

The Egyptian farmers traded all of their beasts of burden and livestock to the Pharaoh for food for one year. Why didn’t they eat them? Verse 16 came back to life in the 1930’s with the Agriculture Reconstruction Acts under FDR. The Egyptians finally sold their land, their bodies, and their children to the Pharaoh, forever, in return for the benefits he could provide for them. This is an exact parallel to the Social Security Act. The word “servant,” incidentally, could today more accurately be translated “slave.” [Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance] In verse 21, we see the people being moved off the farms and into the cities. In the 1930’s this was called the “Urban Movement” as the banks began to foreclose on mortgages and Americans were herded off the farms and into the cities to form the labor pool required to produce the war machinery for WW2.
Perhaps the most interesting and informative verse in this chapter is verse 22. Here we see that the priests, already having a secure food supply, had no need to sell their land, their bodies, or their children to the Pharaoh. Thus, the Pharaoh and his priests were the only private, non-taxed landowners in all of Egypt. There have always been a certain number of private landowners in the United States, also. You may verify this by checking with your county land tax officer and asking for a map of the county showing how many parcels of land in your county are not taxed. They may even have a list showing the names and addresses of the “freeholders.”
Since the Pharaoh now owned the land and all the seed, we see in verse 24 how he also had the right to divide the harvest. This is another universal Principle. Only the owner of the pie has the right to divide the pie. As we will find out later on, because the government owns all of our paycheck, they have the right to divide it up - so much for IRS, so much for Social Security, and what is left over is for you and your little ones.

The government owns your entire paycheck; otherwise, you would be the one who could divide it. If you doubt this for a minute, just think back to the nineteen seventies when all the “smart investors” were looking for “tax shelters.” The Treasury made some administrative rulings denying the shelters as deductions although the deductions were made in good faith under current IRS regulations. The IRS took their money by levying and seizing all sources of income, the bank accounts, and the property of the unfortunate investors. Furthermore, they took it without a court order! Is it possible anyone still doubts that the government owns it all?

Verse 25 shows us that the Egyptians were so lacking in knowledge that they were grateful to be slaves and relieved of the burden of ownership of their ranches. It is important to note that the Bible presents accurate history and quite often does so without injecting commentary. The Apostle Paul said, “If you are free, don’t seek to be bound.” It should be obvious even in verse 25 that the Egyptians were trying to find grace in the eyes of a mere man. Since God (YHVY) is a jealous God, it is understandable why Egypt has never again been a first-rate world power.

Verse 26 states even more clearly that there were people in the land who were not taxed. Pharaoh taxed everyone except himself (of course) and the free people who owned their own land. The justification for the tax is easy to understand. In verse 23, we saw that Pharaoh gave them the seed for their crops. The tax was a return to the Pharaoh of his own property. Think for a moment about the phrase “income tax return.” What are you returning that was given to you? Your paycheck, of course. If you don’t already know why it belonged to the IMF in the first place, then keep reading and you will catch on in a few minutes.

These verses are an almost exact historical model of what took place in America from 1928 through 1935. During a contrived money shortage that had been engineered in Europe and set in motion with the 16th amendment and Federal Reserve Acts in 1913, Americans were robbed of their gold and silver and placed in a position where they could be coerced into looking to the government for their security. They were told that by taking a Social Security Number they would never have to fear dying in poverty. What they were not told, however, is that the Social Security Number is also your cosigner I.D. number for the national debt. It is your “Taxpayer Identification Number.”

Look up the legal meaning of the word “instrument.” Use a good Webster’s Dictionary. An instrumentality is an agent that is created by instrument or someone that is obligated on or bound by an instrument. The Social Security Form SS-5 (application for a number) and the Social Security Card are an examples of “legal instruments.” Also look up “United States” in 28USC sec 3002(15)(C ). This definition of “United States” means that if you have a SSN then you are the United States ! When you become bound by the “instrument” called a Social Security Number (SSN) you become an “instrumentality” of Washington, DC‘s corporate government and a “subject” of theirs [14th amendment]. In this book I often refer to the SSN as making you an “instrumentality of the United States,” but ANY instrument that attaches U.S. jurisdiction causes the same result. This includes any document that identifies you as a U.S. citizen. The definition of “taxpayer” is the one who owes the tax. The original taxpayer is the bankrupt government of Washington, DC and subsequent taxpayers are the instrumentalities of Washington, DC. The International Bankers have learned how to play us like musical instruments.

[RickA]

WOW! squirrel. I have just read that part of Genesis and never saw the correlation to the 1920's and 1930's.

I think I'll study that.

Thanks.

[squirrel]

Title 26 USC sec 7809 says that any money received under Internal revenue LAW is to be paid into the U.S. TREASURY, daily. It says nothing, whatsoever, about money collected under contract. Since all income is paid directly to the federal reserve banks (not even a government owned company, let alone the treasury) this is corroborating evidence that income tax is collected under contract, not law. Look at several checks the IRS has returned to you. They will say, “Pay to any FRB [Federal Reserve Bank] on OBG [obligations].”

When a Sovereign Citizen signs a Social Security Number Application (formSS-5) they are exercising their freewill right to contract. They exchange their labor and the fruits of their labor for the dubious honor of sharing the yoke of bondage under the biggest mountain of debt this world has ever known. The internationals bankers have invented a system whereby a free people will willingly turn their backs on God’s blessings of liberty and gratefully welcome this “high-tech” form of slavery to pay off debts made by ungodly people for ungodly purposes. The delight I have seen on the faces of some senior citizens when they get their first Social Security check reminds me of verse 25 of the historical example. From all the evidence I have seen there does not seem to be any purpose for the debt other than to enslave us. The debt has certainly not made the world a safer place to live, especially for unborn babies and young soldiers.

Luckily, there is a remedy. If you want to be free to enjoy ALL of the fruits of your labor and to do as you see fit on your own land, then you may use a legal way to break the contracts you signed. You must reject, renounce, revoke, repudiate, and rescind any benefits or potential benefits, for you or your dependents, which you may have accrued under those contracts. Just as a potential benefit causes a liability for premiums with an insurance company, the potential for liability under social security disability for you or your dependents has caused an obligation for you to pay your share of the tribute money.

Occasionally, a story will circulate about someone using Social Security Regulations to get all the money back that they have paid into social security, but I will not have any confidence in those stories until I see a Xerox of a check. Although you were defrauded into signing the SS-5, you were potentially eligible to receive a benefit; so (under their rules) you owned the premiums. I did demand a return of all money taken from me by their fraudulent promotion of the Social Security Ponzi Scheme, but I have not recovered a dime. Liberty is worth more than Social Security can give me, anyway. Due to conditions beyond my control, I cannot guarantee that the SSA will deliver your money.

After I became a Sovereign, some new information has come to light that may give future Sovereigns a financial boost as they leave the government’s jurisdiction. Since the Social Security Trust Fund was set up as a Trust, you have every right as a beneficiary to withdraw any funds deposited on your behalf when you disassociate yourself from the Trust. An additional step that may be made while giving up your obligations under Social Security is to demand the delivery of all funds deposited by yourself and on your behalf by various employers. If those funds are not delivered within thirty days, then you will have the right to presume that the Social Security Trust Fund is bankrupt and initiate compelled bankruptcy proceedings against the Social Security Trust Fund.

In order to regain your Sovereignty, you must stop turning to the government for benefits and turn to God for those benefits. Another way to put it might be to “find a way to live without giving up our liberty through enslaving contracts.”

[squirrel]

There is a guy in california who does the same procedure as Burney in Strategic Withdrawel, he helps you do all the work , no matter where you live in America.

He helps you out with employers, etc.

But the cost is $3.200.00 it can be less if you get others to sign up.

Here is his e-mail address.
Bradley Warren, Pugh

s2scrm@yahoo.com

I thinks it's called Sovereign Christ Redemption Ministry.
He was on Liberty Forum Radio for two weekends with John Bryant.

[squirrel]

REAL SOVEREIGNS DON’T PAY TRIBUTE

Matthew 17:24-27, Matthew 22:15-22

As mentioned in chapter three, there is reason to believe the Egyptian farmers paid no tribute to Pharaoh prior to the famine. In Matthew 17:25 a disciple entered into a verbal contract with a tax collector that his Master (and, by presumption, Peter) was obligated to pay a tax. I will paraphrase Jesus’ response with modern American instead of 1611 King James English:

Jesus said, “what could you have been thinking about, Simon? Of whom do earthly governments charge taxes, their own Citizens or of foreigners?” (Our word “stranger” comes from the same root as the Spanish word “extranjero,” which means “foreigner.”)
Peter answered, “Of foreigners.”
Jesus clinched this in Peter’s mind by pointing out, “then the Citizens are free (of taxation and regulation).” Remember that the subject is taxation.

Jesus then found a solution to their immediate predicament (paying the tax). He told Peter to go catch a fish and use the piece of money he would find in the fish’s mouth to pay the tax for Jesus and for Peter, but not pay taxes for the other eleven disciples.
From these verses, we learn what the Rabbi Jesus taught about taxes :

1. Non-franchised Citizens do not pay tribute.
2. If you agree that you owe tribute (written or verbal contract) then you must pay it.
3. If God provides the money through some miraculous means to pay tribute, then pay it.
4. From the example of the other eleven disciples, we see that there is no religiously imposed duty to pay tribute that is not owed.

In those days, a Citizen was free to work his land, work at his trade, or deal in goods free of his own government’s interference. However, if a foreigner were to ask permission (apply for a license) to enter the country, cross the country’s territory or do business in the country then they had to pay for the privilege in the form of excises, imposts, duties, and licenses. So, we have a very good reason to believe the pre-famine Egyptian Citizen [see chapter three] was free in all senses of the word, including free of taxation. We also see that the governments only legitimate usage of their authority to tax is for the protection of the freedom of the Free Citizens. How else could Jesus have truthfully made the blanket statement regarding “Kings of the earth” in verse twenty-five ?

If you question the Authors conclusions on the meaning of the above-selected verses from Matthew 17, then ask yourself the following questions:

1. Why did Jesus use the particular words “not to offend”? (consult Strong’s)
2. Why did Jesus use a miracle to pay a tax if “the children are free” means that the government cannot tax us under any conditions, including unconscionable contract ?
3. Why did Jesus NOT pay the tax for the other eleven disciples ?
4. What did Peter do differently than the other eleven disciples ? ( Opened his big mouth. )

Business in America was conducted in much the same manner as it was in Israel until the Banking Relief Act of March 9th , 1933 amended the Trading with the Enemies Act of Oct 6th 1917, allowing the U.S. Government to treat American Citizens as if they were the enemy. The old Trading with the Enemy Act had allowed the government to seize bank accounts and assets of foreigners but carefully stipulated that this did not allow seizure of an American’s assets.
The first effect of the Banking Relief Act was to amend out the protection for Americans. By act of Congress, war was declared upon the American People on March 9th 1933.

In FDR’s inaugural address, he told the nation that he was going to ask congress for the power to deal with the depression as if it were a war. He gained that power in the Banking Relief Act and the War Powers Act. The Constitution provides that during time of war or national emergency there can be Martial Law Courts. The Constitution provides that during war or national emergency the right to Habeas Corpus may be suspended. The United States has been in a constant state of war or national emergency since 1933. First was the war on the depression, then WW2, then Korea, then Lebanon, then the Suez Canal, then Civil Rights, then Haiti, then Viet Nam, then the war on poverty, war on drugs, then Lebanon again, then the war on crime, then Somalia, then Bosnia, then Lebanon, then Haiti again, etc. Are you getting the picture ???? Every president since FDR has had some type of war to justify the continued martial law and denial of common law protection of Citizens. More on this, later.

In Matthew 22:15-22, Jesus had another encounter where the subject of paying tribute was raised. This time, a group of people representing the religious “status quo” was seeking to trick Jesus into saying something whereby they could accuse Him to the Roman government. Jesus called them some pretty hard names because He could see that their hearts were bad. Jesus asked them who’s (graven) image was on the coin and they answered, “Caesar’s.” Jesus said, “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things which are God’s.” Among other things, He was saying essentially the same thing He had told Peter. If you have contracted to pay tribute, then pay the tribute. Once you have contracted to pay tribute (have a Social Security Card) then the money is no longer yours. It is Caesar’s. Give him what ever he wants, because it is his. If you have NOT signed any contracts, the money is YOURS and follow the example of the other eleven disciples in Matthew, Chapter 17. Even the most brain-dead pulpit-puppet cannot twist this passage to mean that we have to give the government anything the government does not already own.

[squirrel]

In Article 1, sec 9 the U.S. Constitution allows the government to raise money through excises, imposts, and other duties. No capitation or other direct tax may be placed on Citizens of the several states except under conditions that the government does not even pretend to exist. Is this true ? In order to understand the next couple of paragraphs, you need to put forth the effort to read your constitution and the relevant portions of the Internal Revenue Code.

Because an income tax is a capitation tax or direct tax, then how do they get around this Constitutional restriction ? Easy ! The restriction only applies to Citizens of the several States. Because you signed your application for a Social Security Card (as well as countless other documents) saying you are a U.S. citizen ( capital U.S. small c ), they have ample room for presumption that you are under their jurisdiction via their 14th amendment.

The IRS is an “alter ego” for “Common Law Trust #62” which is registered in Puerto Rico, and is therefore inside the jurisdiction of Washington, DC. The actual, physical headquarters building of the IRS is in the Virgin Islands and all of your income taxes are made to appear as if you were working there and your taxes were being collected in the Virgin Islands ! Your IRS Individual Master File Transaction Codes will verify this. The official records of births, deaths, marriages, and divorces will show that most American Taxpayers have never set foot in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The passenger manifests for the airlines and shipping lines will support the vital statistics records. This means that the Transaction Codes for the IRS are a deliberate fraud.

When you look up the definition of “United States” in 26 IRC (USC) sec 7701 you will find that the only “states” included are pieces of land usually referred to as “territories.” They call the Virgin Islands “a State.” They presumed to intend the results of their deliberate acts. By using the word “include” in the definition , they are legally excluding all things not included in the list. “Include” does not mean “including, but not limited to.” IRS Code Section 7701 begins by saying that these definitions apply unless they are “otherwise expressed” in the code. Because the term “United States” is “otherwise expressed” to mean (not “include”) all fifty states in section 4612(a)(4)(A), then the “United States” as defined in section 7701 could not possibly mean all fifty states! The definition given in sec 7701 is the general definition for the entire code. The definition in sec (a)(4)(A) is for that section only. Here is your iron-clad proof of deliberate, premeditated fraud, and your way out.