Tax Terrorism

The name speaks for itself ... it is about tax terrorism in Canada.

http://taxterrorism.com/index.php

Corporatocracy man, its everwhere. THEY WILL NOT STOP TILL THEY HAVE IT ALL.

[charlesa6]

What you know? They are all over places.

[esse]

Luke 20:20-26
And they watched him, and sent forth spies, which should feign themselves just men, that they might take hold of his words, that so they might deliver him unto the power and authority of the governor. And they asked him, saying, Master, we know that thou sayest and teachest rightly, neither acceptest thou the person of any, but teachest the way of God truly: Is it lawful for us to give tribute unto Caesar, or no? But he perceived their craftiness, and said unto them, Why tempt ye me? Shew me a penny. Whose image and superscription hath it? They answered and said, Caesars. And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesars, and unto God the things which be Gods. And they could not take hold of his words before the people: and they marvelled at his answer, and held their peace.

"If you are not prepared to learn the principles and responsibilities of liberty, then be prepared to learn the
principles of slavery !!”

The British Monarchy ceased to have any relevance to Canada in 1901, upon the death of Queen Victoria. All British Monarchs have been pretender Monarchs of Canada since that date.
The Parliament of Canada is a de facto usurper of governing power over Canada since 1931, and in reality, since 1901.
In 1893, The Imperial Parliament in London passed the Statutes Revision Act wherein Section 2 of the BNA Act 1867 was REPEALED. What was Section 2? It was the succession right of "successors and heirs" of Queen Victoria, the Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland to become the Monarch of Canada after the death of Queen Victoria. Thus, it appears that ALL Kings and Queens of England who have reigned since 1901, the date of Victoria's death, are PRETENDERS and HOAXES to the title "Crown in Right of Canada".

In 1931 Canada was officially "decommissioned" as a colony of Great Britain by the Statute of Westminster(BR.); and, since no federal state/territory existed or was created to establish eminent domain, (Ottawa being a city in the Province of Ontario, not a federal district), no provision was made to establish a Federal Government to replace the British appointed Governor General and his advisory body (the Canadian Parliament). Roman personhood ceased for the Canadian Parliament upon the cessation of the British Governors General.

Further, no constitution existed. Section 7 of the Statute of Westminster was inserted because the British Government recognized no Federal Government or Federal authority in Canada. All authority (sovereignty) and eminent domain reverted to the former North American colonies and the four provinces created out of the Hudson Bay Territory. This really meant "the People" of the Provinces, as provincial legislatures remained under the control of a fraudulent Lieutenant Governor, thus under the control of an ultra vires Federal Government and in the name of a foreign monarch. That status remains. The People of Canada have never assented to having the Crown of England as the Crown of Canada. There is no physical crown or throne of or in Canada.

ALL authority of the British Crown (Royal Prerogative) over any "dominion" or colony was relinquished in the 1931 Statute of Westminster(BR.) - if it even existed by some unknown contrivance after the death of Queen Victoria in 1901.

Wake up Canada

Amazing isn't it, Canada's bogus court system. A friend recently wrote to the queen and asked her how he had offended her and why was she suing him in court. The queen wrote back and said she had nothing to do with the court system in Canada. The queen is the plaintiff in many cases. REGINA [latin for queen] v TOM JONES. 'The People of Canada have never assented to having the Crown of England as the Crown of Canada. There is no physical crown or throne of or in Canada.'

[esse]

In 1864, those who wished to maintain a tie with England,
and not be absorbed by the United States, went to England
with a request to be given permission to become a sovereign
Federal State. Queen Victoria and the British Parliament
believed that canada was too immature to be a sovereign
federal nation, so combined the then 4 colonies into
a super-colony with the Provinces being sub-colonies.

It seems that Queen Victoria and the British Parliament
decided that Canada could go it alone around the 1890s,
so they took out the succession rights of the Monarchs of
Great britain to be the Monarch of Canada in 1893. That
became effective on Q. Victoria's death in 1901.
Without a Monarch, the British BNA Act ceased to be
applicable to Canada.

However, other powers in England kept the old colonial
thing going, and that came to another climax in 1931,
with the passage of the Statute of Westminster. Again,
Canada was kept as a colony, and apparently the Crown
which took over as colonial overlord was the Crown of
the City of London - that being the financial district
of Greater London. That area never ceased being a Roman
city within the Roman Empire - became the Holy Roman Empire
when the Bishop of Rome crowned himself Pontifex Maximus
around 600 AD.

The City of London Crown rules through the lawyers which
have first loyalty to the Crown Temple of the City of London,
and the Bankers to the Vatican, the Rothschilds, who runs the
western world banks. Thus the lawyers and the bankers own and
run the political parties of Canada for the Crown.

That is our current status as a make-believe country.

The City of London imposes slave status upon us by
imposing a Crown owned name (birth certificate name)
upon us - getting us to ignorantly use, aclnowledge,
be identified as that name. Given names are never
accepted, and family names are only for reference
as to whom the given names apply. However, given names
are only a child's name, not an adult. You can be given
something, but it is not yours until you accept it.

CANADIAN EXPOSES ILLEGAL COURT SYSTEM OCT 24/06
CANADIAN GORDON ROY CAIRNS TAKE ON ILLEGAL COURT SYSTEM AND WINS!

Gordon showed me the definition of a country in the Oxford Dictionary. It said a country has it own independent government. Does Canada have it own independent government, court systems or police forces? I think not! Please ponder what Gordon Roy Cairns shared in a Vancouver court room.

Your Honour, may I ask the court a couple of questions? 1st question is: Is Canada a country? (If he or she says yes) then can you explain to me and to the people born in Canada why a foreigner’s servent is holding court here? And, do you not serve her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the 2nd? Thank- you!

After sharing these insights, no charges were pursued against him, and any judges requested to go against Gordon Cairns refused to press any charges for fear of this truth being made public record!

Do we have treasonous courts, police and government? Think about what kind of sovereign country you would like to live in and take similar action in any court in the land and find out the same truth as
did Gordon Cairns did! If the judge refuses to let you talk in court, he is also breaking your human rights and charter rights along with the cosmic god’s law of one! Nesara Canada are exposing similar truths for all to ponder!


You give up your god's given right each time you sign an agency sow's ear legal contract, because you waive another contract, The Bill of Rights create by the people for the people based on Natural survival law to protect their life, liberty and pousuit of (enlightment) happiness.

Act 22:28
And the chief captain answered, With a great sum of money(birth certificate) obtained I this freedom. And Paul said, But I was [free] born.

Who would sign a legal contract which will automatiqueley violate you god's given rights? Those who ignore who they really are because they went to the Government school of slave propagante of their program of Ignorance.
Their admiralty constitution is not the constitution by the people for the people. You become slave subject when you contract with them legal or not Even if it is not legal you conscent, people do not ask question they just:

Act 28:27
For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with [their] eyes, and hear with [their] ears, and understand with [their] heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

You will get equity of privilege from the master you give him power and who will decides that you should get in return i.e a big nothing.
Lazy and idolatrous people who don't want the responsibility part of liberty will try to make the government and everyone
else into their caretaker, and that ultimately leads to so******m.

"I am sure there was no man born marked of God above another for none comes into the world with a saddle upon his back, neither any booted and spurred to ride him." Last words of Richard Rumbold before being hanged for planning an insurrection against the tyrant Charles II, 1679


My suggestion his prepare yourself for a big long time wood survival, remove your plate car (buy horses), buy gold do free equity trade on barter system as old days stop paying taxe to the thugs and quit your slave job and burn the Government bankers card and all bond documents.

RECLAIM YOUR NATURAL FREE BORN and cut the chain that hold you from beoing responsable for your own life.

War is evil and non sens stop financing it as your are part complice of it in killing millions of innocent people.

We had enough sleep it's time to speak and stop living in the murderer system we now participating.

Love is the only answer the sole miracle and solution.

I have read the taxterrorist website and his first index is well said but those who seek to imply his technic of filling an income tax return are putting them at high risk since Robsters Banksters know that they perpetrate satanic movement to rob you and make your life a nightmare. They do everything they want they are above the law since they have created. The creator is behond his creature.

This is interesting question to ask, esse, is Canada a country? If Canada was a country per se then judge aka clerk would have no qualms about explaining it. So IF, REGINA [LATIN for queen] was the true plaintiff she would be physically there in the courtroom, and what are the odds of that???!!!! Getting stuck by lightening is more likely.

According to the Statute of Westminster 1931, the government was to establish NO courts of admiralty in Canada as the people of the provinces were given Common Law by unalienable birthright, antecedent to England. However with sleight of hand, and with gradualism, the name morphed from admiralty law to administrative law. SUMMARY JURISDICTION=ADMIRALTY LAW=ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. The result is a sham --Star Chamber proceeding-- whose primary intent is to confiscate and re-distribute spoils of war by de facto convictions, prosecutions. Section 6 of the statute reads: Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions of this Act, section four of the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 (which requires certain laws to be reserved for the signification of His Majesty's pleasure or to contain a suspending clause), and so much of section seven of that Act as requires the approval of His Majesty in Council to any rules of Court for regulating the practice and procedure of a Colonial Court of Admiralty, shall cease to have effect in any Dominion as from the commencement of this Act.

Supreme Court ~ Summary Jurisdiction = Admiralty Law

Supreme Court Act *a superior court having original jurisdiction in ALL cases (s.9)

The line that separated Canada's common law and civil law in Quebec no longer exist, per summary judgment trial Rule18A implemented by Justices such as Madam Chief Justice Beverly MCLachlin and Mr. Justice McEarchen, amongst others.

Rule 18A within the Supreme Court, is like an arbitration hearing, the only difference is the hearing are held in public. What is referred to in British Columbia and other parts of the country, as Rule 18A, in the United States, it is referred as what it is, an arbitrary hearing, within the Supreme Court.

The definition of Rule 18A as per the Canadian Legal Dictionary

A Rule of the Supreme Court of British Columbia providing for the SUMMARY TRIAL [--kangaroo court--] on affidavits, of civil actions where a judge is able FAIRLY to decide the case or an issue in the case, usually without hearing witnesses. This process is available only in British Columbia. Fairly is the operative word in this definition.

I am sure that the author of taxterrorism.com understands that the taxfarmers are terrorists at heart. I do not understand how a short order cook can have a tax liability of 1.5 million. No many could, but the denizens of CRA who 'artfully' create bogus assessments.

http://www.newdeal.0catch.com/

http://www.detaxcanada.org/kuhl.htm

In other words, ever since the enactment of the Statute of Westminster in 1931, by the British Govemment, each of the provinces of Canada has been a completely sovereign and independent state, and because the provinces have signed nothing since then constituting a Federal Union and a Federal Government, and because no such treaty has been ratified by the people of Canada, the provinces still enjoy the status of sovereignty and are privileged to use it in any way they see fit.

As you will observe from the enclosed addresses, I quote eminent Canadian constitutional authorities as suggesting that the only and logical solution to the existing constitutional circumstances is the drafting and the adoption of a proper federal constitution in which the provinces can reserve for themselves any and all powers necessary to enable them to govern their provinces successfully.

I am sure you can appreciate that if this were done, you could solve your economic and other problems in Quebec without resorting to separation. I feel sure that having the ability to solve your problems and still remain constitutionally part of the country of Canada, would be much more satisfactory to your supporters as well as to others within your province.

The following is a summary of the reasons for the things I have just stated:

1. At the time of Confederation movement in Canada, the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick desired to form a Federal Union.
2. The Quebec Resolutions of 1864 provided for a Federal Union.

3. The Bill drafted by the Canadian degates at the London Conference in 1866 also provided for a Federal Union.

4. The Colonial Office of the Imperial Parliament was not disposed to grant the Provinces of Canada their request for a Federal Union.

5. The British North America Act enacted by the Imperial Parliament carried out neither the spirit nor the terms of the Quebec Resolutions.

6. Canada did not become a Federal Union or a Confederation under the British North America Act, but rather a United Colony. The privilege of federation, therefore, was still a future privilege for the provinces of Canada.

7. The Parliament of Canada did not become the government of Canada, much less a federal government; it became merely the central legislature of a United Colony, a legislative body whose only power was that of aiding and advising the Governor-General as agent of the Imperial Parliament.

8. The British North America Act, as enacted by the Imperial Parliament, was not a constitution but merely an act of the Imperial Parliament which united four colonies in Canada into one colony, with the supreme authority still remaining in the hands of the British government.

9. The privilege of federating became realizable for the provinces of Canada, only through the enactment of the Statute of Westminster on December 11, 1931. Through this statute, the Imperial Parliament relinquished to the people of Canada their sovereign rights, and through them to their Provincial governments as their most direct agents.

10. Since December 11, 1931, the Provinces of Canada have not acted on their newly acquired status in the forming of a Federal Union, nor have the people of Canada ratified a constitution. Therefore, the original proposition, namely: that all power to govern in Canada resides at the moment, with the Provinces of Canada; and, that all power legally remains there until such time as the Provinces sign an agreement and ratify a constitution whereby they may delegate such powers as they wish to a central government of their own creation. In the meantime, Canada exists as ten political units without a political superior.

[esse]

In 1931 Canada was officially "decommissioned" as a colony of Great Britain by the Statute of Westminster(BR.); and, since no federal state/territory existed or was created to establish eminent domain, (Ottawa being a city in the Province of Ontario, not a federal district), no provision was made to establish a Federal Government to replace the British appointed Governor General and his advisory body (the Canadian Parliament). Roman personhood ceased for the Canadian Parliament upon the cessation of the British Governors General.

DO YOU WANT MORE ABOUT THE FRAUD OF THE CENTURY BY THE GOVERNEMENT OF CANADA? TERRORIST AS THEY ARE THEY WILL NOT HESITATE TO KILL US ONE BY ONE BECAUSE THEY ARE ANTI-LIFE AND NON RESPECFUL FOR HUMANITY

People have accepted their slavery big time otherwise they would have stopped this mayhem in given support to the conquers al-CCRAeda (International Robsters, Banksters).

If I were Alpha wolf (Govt) and you were Omega wolf (slave Canadian Citizen): all you would have to do is roll over on your back, let me nip you in a couple of my favorite places, don't dare bite me and I'll only 'make action,' and I won't nip you to hard unless you try to wiggle, defend yourself, or spray me. William Dixon

Our futur will always depend on each of us action.

What happen in Canada and USA is the same **** the only difference is that USA have had courageous men to introduce Bills of Rights and Declaration of independence and constitution based on God's Love Law.

People have their gap continuously distend ready to get nipped deep, they love it, and their Dictators State masters actually do a really good job.

Let us clarify a few critical "BLACK LETTER LAW" realities about what Canada legally is. Canada today is no different then Canada was when it was created as an "ARTIFICIAL PERSON" an ordinary Act of the Imperial Parliament called the British North American Act in 1867; it is a colony of the British Monarchy with ALL state powers vested in the British Monarch!
Canada is not a democracy in which the sovereign authority actively vests in the people.

There is no people contracted constitution in Canada today, and never has been.

In Canada, there is no government by the people, for the people, and never has been, and there never will be as long as we fail to follow the same procedural pathway that our great friends in the U.S.A. did when they declared themselves a Constitutional Republic in 1776.

The "ROYAL PREROGATIVE" has always been reserved and held by the Monarch - e.g. King or Queen. YOU CANNOT HAVE A MONARCHIAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT THAT WORKS LEGALLY ANY OTHER WAY, SOVERIGNITY IS EITHER IN THE MONARCH OR IN THE PEOPLE!
It horrified me, to listen to that great educator - the CBC TV, on Monday February 6th 2006 during the swearing in of our new government, to all of our great friends in the Conservative Party of Canada swearing allegiance to the foreign Queen as the "Queen of Canada" and thus actively acknowledging Her Sovereignty over the colony of Canada, all of its people and resources.

As I indicated in last week's column, Canada is an "ARTIFICIAL PERSON" with very limited statute created powers by an ordinary Acts of the British Parliament which are the Act of Settlement, 1701, The Royal Proclamation, 1763, The Quebec Act, 1774, The Constitutional Act, 1791, British North American Act, 1867 and updates in 1871, and 1886.
The British North American Act was not a constitutional document - see the Canadian Department of Justice website printout and the 1945 Federal Parliamentorial Hansard transcript.

The BNA clearly kept Canada as a subservient colony of the British Monarchy which it still is today. All the Act did was to create a new united colony called Canada. All sovereign authority remained vested in the British Monarchy. The British Monarchy delegates its sovereign authority via its Governor-in-General and it's Privy Council and via these two power control points almost every critical appointment, law and regulation in Canada is authorized from the top down.
The federal government does not have any inherent rights and is fully accountable to our rights as "FREEMAN / HUMAN BEINGS" as our "LIVING TREE OF CONSTITUTION" has evolved over 790 years under the "Fundamental Laws of England".

Please read an excerpt from Hansard of the Canadian Parliament of a speech delivered by the Hon. Walter F. Kuhl, M.P. for Jasper-Edson on November 6, 1945. From 1867 up to the 1914 War Measures Act functional sovereignty was balanced between The British Monarchy and its Governor-in-General, Privy Council, Parliament and Colonial administration, and the Provinces and the new administrative federal Canadian government and its Privy Council, Parliament and Senate.

'Canada Without A Constitution' I therefore pose this question: Whence does the Dominion Parliament deriveits authority to govern this country? The Imperial Parliament cannot create a federal union in Canada or constitute a federal government for the peopleof Canada by virtue of the British North America Act or any other act. Thiscan be done only by the people of Canada, and they have not yet done so.' http://www.albertarepublicans.org/noconstitution.htm
http://truemantuck.ca/Columns/Column7.html
“Canada: the Non-Country!” http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regio...06/343764.html

When we refer to our current alleged Canadian government as de jure, we no doubt mean de facto, since de facto means “in fact”, but not “by law”, which is what de jure means. In other words, a lawful government is a de jure government. A government that exists by deception and fraud, and not by lawful authority, is a de facto government.

It's highly unlikely that the Canadian establishment, with political millionaire shysters as its vanguard, is ignorant of the actual history of Canada and its fake government. The fake version taught in our schools has nothing in common with 135 years of reality; of government by millionaires, of millionaires, for millionaires.

Canada is neither a federation nor does its government operate with legitimate authority. Knowing this and keeping mum about it makes politicians and the entire Bar Association criminal offenders by default, if not by design...all of them, past and present. Which doesn't matter much these days because it's obviously cool (and very profitable) to be lawless, as far as those at the trough are concerned.

Judging by politicians, and the legal community's visible conduct, their strategy seems to be one of perpetually reinforcing the nixing of the UNAUTHORIZED AND ILLEGITIMATE EXISTENCE OF CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS (DE JURE) by teaching and celebrating a Canadiana, pickled in bald-faced lies, with much ado and hoopla.

The Governor General acts as the Queen's vice-regal representative in Canada and is often viewed as the de facto head of state. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_General_of_Canada

Under constitutional law, particularly in Canada and the United States, constitutions give federal and provincial or state governments various powers. To go outside those powers would be ultra vires; for example, although the court did not use the term, in striking down a federal law in United States v. Lopez on the grounds that it exceeded the Constitutional authority of Congress, the Supreme Court effectively declared the law to be ultra vires. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_vires